|
|
| |
Exam entry window opens | 18/10/2023 | 25/10/2023 | 01/11/2023 |
Exam entry window closes | 23/04/2024 | 30/04/2024 | 08/05/2024 |
Pre-seen material to students | 22/03/2024 | 27/03/2024 | 05/04/2024 |
Exam dates | 08-10 May 2024 | 15-17 May 2024 | 22-24 May 2024 |
Publish results | 27/06/2024 | 04/07/2024 | 11/07/2024 |
Certificates dispatch (more info ) | CERT Dip MA available from 20/09/2024 | CERT Adv Dip MA available from 20/09/2024 | ACMA / CGMA designation - more info |
August 2024
|
|
| |
Exam entry window opens | 24/01/2024 | 31/01/2024 | 07/02/2024 |
Exam entry window closes | 23/07/2024 | 30/07/2024 | 06/08/2024 |
Pre-seen material to students | 22/03/2024 | 27/03/2024 | 05/04/2024 |
Exam dates | 07-09 August 2024 | 14-16 August 2024 | 21-23 August 2024 |
Publish results | 26/09/2024 | 03/10/2024 | 10/10/2024 |
Certificates dispatch (more info ) | CERT Dip MA available from 20/12/2024 | CERT Adv Dip MA available from 20/12/2024 | ACMA / CGMA designation - more info |
November 2024
|
|
| |
Exam entry window opens | 24/04/2024 | 01/05/2024 | 08/05/2024 |
Exam entry window closes | 22/10/2024 | 29/10/2024 | 05/11/2024 |
Pre-seen material to students | 20/09/2024 | 27/09/2024 | 04/10/2024 |
Exam dates | 06-08 November 2024 | 13-15 November 2024 | 20-22 November 2024 |
Publish results | 02/01/2025 | 09/01/2025 | 09/01/2025 |
Certificates dispatch (more info ) | CERT Dip MA available from 20/03/2024 | CERT Adv Dip MA available from 20/03/2024 | ACMA / CGMA designation - more info |
Unfortunately, your browser does not meet our new security requirements. Before March 17, 2018, upgrade your browser to the newest version to avoid any interruption in accessing PearsonVUE.com.
To purchase an exam:
Get hands-on experience of our computer-based assessments. CIMA ® offers two types of question tutorials to cover the objective tests and case study exams.
The question tutorials provide you with examples of the types of questions encountered in the exam. They can be used to experience the test driver and how items are presented. They give you the opportunity to explore this technology and become familiar with how the online system works.
*Please note there are some slight differences between the functionality of the question tutorials and the live exams; in the live exams there is no ‘navigator’ button – candidates can move to the next question by pressing ‘next’. Questions can be flagged for review and reviewed at the end of the exam via the review screen.
How to register for a free question tutorial
These are designed to familiarise you with the exam software and functionality you will encounter at the test centre. They are not tailored towards any one qualification.
Take the exam tutorial here »
Internet browsers | Edge, Firefox, Safari and Chrome current version |
Mobile devices | iOS and Android devices are not supported. |
Network connection | Pearson VUE strongly recommends using a wired network rather than a wireless network, since a wired network provides better exam delivery performance. |
Internet connection | Broadband (DSL, cable, or LAN/WLAN): 1 Mbps up/down minimum Dial-up Internet connections are not supported. |
Browser settings | Internet cookies must be enabled. Ensure any security software will not block the execution of JavaScript. |
NB: The above system requirements may only apply to running the tutorials. CIMA’s online exams details »
How to pass the Management Case Study
With the next set of exams coming up we thought it would be great to give you an overview of the management case study, also known as CGMA gateway. The aim of CIMA's CGMA Professional Management case study is to apply the knowledge you have learnt across the whole management level.
BMC Anesthesiology volume 24 , Article number: 237 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
173 Accesses
1 Altmetric
Metrics details
Failure to adhere to perioperative fasting requirements increases aspiration risk and can lead to delay or cancellation of surgery. Point of care gastric ultrasound may guide decision-making to delay, cancel or proceed with surgery.
This study aimed to describe gastric contents using point of care gastric ultrasound in pediatric patients with known fasting guideline violations presenting for elective surgery. This was a single-center retrospectivechart review of gastric ultrasound scans in patients presenting for elective surgeries with “nothing by mouth” violation (per fasting guidelines) or unclear fasting status. The primary outcome is description of gastric contents using point of care ultrasound. The ultrasound findings were classified as low-risk for aspiration (empty, clear fluid < 1.5 ml/kg), high-risk (solids, clear fluid > 1.5 ml/kg), or inconclusive study. Gastric ultrasound findings were communicated to the attending anesthesiologist. For patients proceeding without delay the estimated time saved was defined as the difference between ultrasound scan time and presumed case start time based on American Society of Anesthesiologists fasting guidelines.
We identified 106 patients with a median age of 4.8 years. There were 31 patients (29.2%) that had ultrasound finding of high-risk gastric contents. These patients had cases that were delayed, cancelled or proceeded with rapid sequence intubation. Sixty-six patients (62.3%) were determined to be low-risk gastric contents and proceeded with surgery without delay. For these patients, a median of 2.6 h was saved. No aspiration events were recorded for any patients.
It is feasible to use preoperative point of care gastric ultrasound to determine stomach contents and risk-stratify pediatric patients presenting for elective surgical procedures with fasting non-adherence. Preoperative gastric ultrasound may have a role in determining changes in anesthetic management in this patient population.
Peer Review reports
Pulmonary aspiration is a dreaded anesthetic complication that contributes to significant postoperative morbidity and mortality [ 1 , 2 ]. Despite many technological advances in perioperative care, pulmonary aspiration is continuing to be the leading cause of death in airway management related complications [ 3 ]. Perioperative fasting guidelines aim to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration by ensuring an empty stomach at the time of anesthetic induction in healthy patients [ 4 , 5 ]. However, these guidelines do not consider individual risk factors affecting gastric motility and can vary in different societies and institutions [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. Nothing by mouth (NPO) guideline violations, defined as not following appropriate fasting instructions, have a reported incidence of 1.5 − 4.5% in the pediatric population. Causes of NPO violations include lack of understanding of NPO instructions, patient eating without parental knowledge, scheduling changes in surgical case time, language barriers, and an inconsolable child, among many others [ 8 , 9 ]. Regardless of the reason, case cancellations can lead to delays in access to care, inconvenience and frustration for the patients and their families [ 10 ].
Point of care (POC) gastric ultrasound provides objective, real-time assessment of gastric content and volume. It has been shown to be a reliable diagnostic modality for accurately assessing gastric content and volume [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. POC gastric ultrasound assessment of gastric contents could reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration [ 20 ]. Gastric ultrasound evaluation may minimize case delays, reduce cancellations, and allow for safer anesthetic management by objectively assessing gastric contents in patients at increased risk for aspiration, including patients with NPO violations [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 21 ]. The exact amount of gastric volume that is at risk for aspiration or safe is still unknown and debated [ 22 ]. Although the safest minimum gastric volume is unknown, it has been generally accepted that clear liquids less than 1.5 ml/kg is consistent with baseline gastric secretions and even volumes higher than 1.5 ml/kg could be present in 1-9% of appropriately fasted patients depending on the study population [ 13 , 21 , 23 ]. Gastric volume greater than 1.5 ml/kg and the presence of solid contents can increase the risk of aspiration related complications. [ 17 , 18 ]. We have been using gastric ultrasound to objectively verify gastric contents in pediatric patients for the past few years. The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe the POC gastric ultrasound findings and anesthetic management in pediatric patients with known NPO violations presenting for surgery.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained prior to study commencement (IRB# 2023 − 0292). Existing records of all gastric ultrasound scans performed in perioperative patients presenting for elective surgical procedures with known NPO violation based on ASA preoperative fasting guidelines [ 4 ] or unclear NPO status between December 2022 and April 2023 were included.
The primary outcome was the preoperative ultrasound findings of the gastric contents. The ultrasound findings were classified as low-risk for aspiration (empty, clear fluid < 1.5 ml/kg), high-risk (solids, clear fluid > 1.5 ml/kg), or inconclusive study as previously described by Spencer and colleagues [ 23 ]. Secondary outcomes include the estimated time saved in patients with gastric ultrasound as compared to following standard ASA fasting guidelines.
Per institutional practice, gastric ultrasound scans are performed by a small subset of anesthesiologists experienced in point-of-care (POC) gastric ultrasound exams at the request of the anesthesia team caring for the patient. The anesthesiologists performing gastric ultrasound at our institutional have all previously participated in the departmental POC gastric ultrasound education curriculum using the I-AIM framework described in the 2021 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine expert panel recommendations on point-of-care ultrasound education and training [ 12 , 24 ].
All gastric ultrasound scans are performed using a 3-5 MHz curvilinear probe (Venue G.O. or LOGIQ S7 [G.E. Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA] or TE7 [Mindray, Mahwah, NJ, USA] ultrasound machines). All patients are scanned in the right lateral decubitus position with the probe in a parasagittal orientation. The gastric antrum is visualized at the aorta and superior mesenteric artery level. The predicted antral volume for clear fluids is determined using a cross-sectional area as described by Spencer and colleagues [ 23 ]. A procedure note describing ultrasound findings and interpretation is placed in the medical record and communicated to the family and the anesthesiologist assigned to the case. The anesthesia team determines case management, induction technique, and choice of airway.
For the study, the following data were extracted and recorded on a data sheet: age, gender, surgical procedure, NPO times, gastric ultrasound findings, induction technique, case delay or cancellation, airway used, and aspiration events. For patients proceeding without delay, the estimated time saved was calculated as the difference between ultrasound scan time and presumed case start time based on ASA fasting guidelines (2 h for clears, 6 h for milk/formula, 8 h for solids). Cost savings analysis was performed using customary operating room service charges published by Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center under Sect. 3727.42 of Ohio Revised Code. OR charge for first 15 min = $3,285, and additional 15 min = $1,034.
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) is a 673-bed non-profit organization serving as the University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center’s major teaching facility for pediatrics and the only children’s hospital in the Cincinnati metropolitan area (population of 2.3 million). CCHMC performs more than 45,000 anesthetics annually.
Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel software. Descriptive data, median and interquartile ranges (IQR) for continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables were analyzed.
During the 15-month study period, we identified 106 patients with gastric ultrasound examinations performed for NPO violation prior to non-urgent surgical procedures. Eight anesthesiologists certified in POC gastric ultrasound performed gastric ultrasound examinations in the study cohort. Demographic data are presented in Table 1 .
Low-risk : Ultrasound evidence of gastric antrum consistent with low risk for aspiration (defined as an empty gastric antrum or clear fluids < 1.5 ml/kg) was noted in 66 patients (62.3%) identified as NPO violators as per the current ASA guidelines. All of these patients proceeded with surgery without delay. A median of 2.6 h (IQR 1 to 3.5) was saved for these patients. This represents median $10,523 (IQR $6,387 to $16,727) operating room cost as estimated by customary per hour operating room service charges. High-risk : Ultrasound evidence of high-risk antrum (clear liquids > 1.5 ml/kg or presence of any amount of solids) was noted in 31 (29.2%) patients. Only two patients had clear fluid greater than 1.5 ml/kg. One surgery proceeded after a two-hour wait. The other patient was asked to wait, but the family rescheduled the case. In patients with thick or solid material ( n = 29), 22 (76%) cases were canceled. Five cases were delayed to comply with the appropriate NPO guidelines and proceeded as usual. Three cases were delayed to comply with NPO guidelines and proceeded with rapid sequence induction (RSI). One patient’s procedure was deemed urgent by the surgeon, secondary to a dental abscess, and the anesthesia team proceeded with RSI after five hours of fasting after the patient ate low-fat yogurt.
Gastric ultrasound findings, risk level assessment, and management decision data are summarized in Table 2 . No aspiration events were recorded for any of the patients.
Our study demonstrated that gastric ultrasound provided objective evidence which may have guided decision-making for patients with known NPO violations or unclear NPO status in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery. Approximately 60% of the patients had ultrasound evidence of either an empty antrum or low-volume clear fluid, and the elective surgeries proceeded without delay. This positively impacts the family experience and improves operating room utilization.
The gastric fluid volume that minimizes the risk of pulmonary aspiration is still being debated [ 22 ]. Multiple ultrasound and endoscopic studies demonstrated that up to 95–97% of appropriately fasted children have a residual gastric volume < 1.25–1.5 ml/kg [ 23 , 25 ]. We used 1.5 ml/kg as the threshold to minimize the risk of unnecessary cancellation because children are rarely anesthetized immediately following gastric scanning. The intake nurse confirms NPO verification within the first few minutes of assessment in Same-Day Surgery. Confirmation triggers a call for POC gastric ultrasound, where gastric ultrasound is performed well before induction time in the preoperative holding area. While we do not have formal documentation of the scan time duration, the scan typically takes less than five minutes during the preoperative evaluation stage. POC gastric ultrasound does not cause a delay to the start of the procedure. We believe most patients at or close to the 1.5 ml/kg threshold reached a lower volume by anesthesia induction. In patients with inconclusive ultrasound scans due to patient movement, colonic air artifact or other factors, the decision to proceed, delay or cancel these procedures was made without information from the ultrasound study by the primary anesthesiologist provider. In patients with solid material in the stomach, the decision to cancel, delay or perform RSI was at the attending anesthesiologist’s discretion.
Presumably, many of the cases with known NPO violations would have been canceled, although our study could not determine that outcome. Reducing case cancellation and delays positively impacts patient care, family satisfaction, and improves operating room utilization. For the cases proceeding without delay we estimated saving a median 2.6 h of operating room time per patient. We estimate up to $10,523 in lost operating room charges could have been saved per patient. However, this does not take into account being able to adjust operating room scheduled to move up other patients when delay occurs because of NPO violation. Prospective studies and more detailed cost-savings analysis may be warranted to better understand the effect of gastric ultrasound on operating room utilization.
Our findings are similar to previously published reports in adult patients. Alakkad et al. showed that preoperative gastric ultrasound in adult patients with known NPO non-adherence undergoing elective surgical procedures led to changes in anesthetic management in 71% of the patients [ 16 ]. Approximately half of the patients had a revised surgery time with a trend toward a lower incidence of surgical delays. Similarly, Van de Putte et al. used gastric ultrasound in 37 adult patients with NPO violations. They found that gastric ultrasound helped change anesthetic management in 54% of cases, with a trend toward lower case cancellations and delays [ 14 ].
Serial gastric ultrasound examination has been used to demonstrate decreasing gastric contents over time in patients being considered for procedural sedation in the emergency department [ 26 ]. Gagey et al. demonstrated qualitative gastric ultrasounds may change anesthetic management in pyloromyotomy patients, as 88.2% no longer required RSI after aspiration of stomach contents [ 27 ].
In our study, we identified some patients with a large amount of clear liquid (> 1.5 ml/kg) in whom gastric ultrasound was used to serially monitor the gastric content over time to ensure it was below the threshold before proceeding with anesthesia.
The present study has several limitations. Due to the study’s retrospective nature, we could not control the decision to perform gastric ultrasound in patients with NPO violations. We did not always have access to detailed information about NPO status, only that there was a known violation or unclear NPO status. We were not able to determine the degree to which the ultrasound findings influenced the anesthesiologist’s decisions to proceed with, delay or cancel cases. This was a single-center study with multiple anesthesiologists with expertise in performing gastric ultrasound quickly. The generalizability of the results to other institutions needs to be confirmed with future prospective multicenter trials. Finally, although no patients in the study were noted to have pulmonary aspiration, our sample size is too small to determine the overall influence of gastric ultrasound on patient safety outcomes due to the low incidence of pulmonary aspiration in pediatric surgical patients.
Using POC gastric ultrasound as a risk assessment tool is feasible to determine gastric contents in pediatric surgical patients with known NPO violations and may be helpful in formulating an appropriate anesthetic plan. Further studies are needed to determine the type and timing of oral intake that warrants performing gastric ultrasound in pediatric patients with known NPO violations.
We studied the use of preoperative gastric ultrasound in preoperative patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures who had suspected or known NPO violations. We demonstrated that risk stratification based on gastric ultrasound findings is feasible and may associated with differences in anesthesia decision-making.
Availability of data and materials: The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
American Society of Anesthesiologists
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Institutional Review Board
Nil per os / Nothing by mouth
Point of care
Rapid sequence induction
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology
Engelhardt T, Webster NR. Pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83(3):453–60.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kluger MT, Visvanathan T, Myburgh JA, Westhorpe RN. Crisis management during anaesthesia: regurgitation, vomiting, and aspiration. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(3):e4.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(5):632–42.
Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration. Application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary Aspiration*. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(3):376–93.
Article Google Scholar
Joshi GP, Abdelmalak BB, Weigel WA, Harbell MW, Kuo CI, Soriano SG, Stricker PA, Tipton T, Grant MD, Marbella AM, et al. 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting: carbohydrate-containing clear liquids with or without protein, chewing gum, and Pediatric Fasting Duration-A Modular Update of the 2017 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting. Anesthesiology. 2023;138(2):132–51.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Frykholm P, Disma N, Andersson H, Beck C, Bouvet L, Cercueil E, Elliott E, Hofmann J, Isserman R, Klaucane A, et al. Pre-operative fasting in children: a guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022;39(1):4–25.
Disma N, Frykholm P. Clear rules for clear fluids fasting in children. Br J Anaesth. 2024;132(1):18–20.
Billings KR, Schneider AL, Safri S, Kauffunger L, Valika T. Patient factors associated with NPO violations in a tertiary care pediatric otolaryngology practice. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020;5(6):1227–32.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Boudreau SA, Gibson MJ. Surgical cancellations: a review of elective surgery cancellations in a tertiary care pediatric institution. J Perianesth Nurs. 2011;26(5):315–22.
Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Munro HM, Gutstein HB, Reynolds PI. Cancellation of pediatric outpatient surgery: economic and emotional implications for patients and their families. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9(3):213–9.
Schmitz A, Schmidt AR. Can we use ultrasound examination of gastric content as a diagnostic test in clinical anaesthesia? Pediatr Anesth. 2019;29(2):112–3.
Haskins SC, Bronshteyn Y, Perlas A, El-Boghdadly K, Zimmerman J, Silva M, Boretsky K, Chan V, Kruisselbrink R, Byrne M, et al. American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine expert panel recommendations on point-of-care ultrasound education and training for regional anesthesiologists and pain physicians-part II: recommendations. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(12):1048–60.
Perlas A, Davis L, Khan M, Mitsakakis N, Chan VW. Gastric sonography in the fasted surgical patient: a prospective descriptive study. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(1):93–7.
van de Putte P, van Hoonacker J, Perlas A. Gastric ultrasound to guide anesthetic management in elective surgical patients non-compliant with fasting instructions: a retrospective cohort study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018;84(7):787–95.
PubMed Google Scholar
Perlas A, Arzola C, Van de Putte P. Point-of-care gastric ultrasound and aspiration risk assessment: a narrative review. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth. 2018;65(4):437–48.
Alakkad H, Kruisselbrink R, Chin KJ, Niazi AU, Abbas S, Chan VW, Perlas A. Point-of-care ultrasound defines gastric content and changes the anesthetic management of elective surgical patients who have not followed fasting instructions: a prospective case series. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(11):1188–95.
Van de Putte P, Perlas A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(1):12–22.
Perlas A, Chan Vincent WS, Lupu Catalin M, Mitsakakis N, Hanbidge A. Ultrasound Assessment of gastric content and volume. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(1):82–9.
Perlas A, Mitsakakis N, Liu L, Cino M, Haldipur N, Davis L, Cubillos J, Chan V. Validation of a mathematical model for ultrasound assessment of gastric volume by gastroscopic examination. Anesth Analgesia. 2013;116(2):357–63.
Zdravkovic M, Berger-Estilita J, Kovacec JW, Sorbello M, Mekis D. A way forward in pulmonary aspiration incidence reduction: ultrasound, mathematics, and worldwide data collection. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2023;73(3):301–4.
Van de Putte P, Vernieuwe L, Jerjir A, Verschueren L, Tacken M, Perlas A. When fasted is not empty: a retrospective cohort study of gastric content in fasted surgical patients†. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(3):363–71.
Van de Putte P, Perlas A. The link between gastric volume and aspiration risk. Search Holy Grail? Anaesth. 2018;73(3):274–9.
Google Scholar
Spencer AO, Walker AM, Yeung AK, Lardner DR, Yee K, Mulvey JM, Perlas A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric volume in the fasted pediatric patient undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: development of a predictive model using endoscopically suctioned volumes. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015;25(3):301–8.
Perlas A, Van de Putte P, Van Houwe P, Chan VWS. I-AIM framework for point-of-care gastric ultrasound. BJA: Br J Anaesth. 2015;116(1):7–11.
Cook-Sather SD, Liacouras CA, Previte JP, Markakis DA, Schreiner MS. Gastric fluid measurement by blind aspiration in paediatric patients: a gastroscopic evaluation. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44(2):168–72.
Leviter J, Steele DW, Constantine E, Linakis JG, Amanullah S. Full stomach despite the wait: point-of-care gastric ultrasound at the Time of Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2019;26(7):752–60.
Gagey AC, de Queiroz Siqueira M, Desgranges FP, Combet S, Naulin C, Chassard D, Bouvet L. Ultrasound assessment of the gastric contents for the guidance of the anaesthetic strategy in infants with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a prospective cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(5):649–54.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M, Initiative S. Strengthening the reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18(6):805–35.
Download references
The authors thank Maria Ashton, MS, RPH, MBA, for writing assistance, editing, and proofreading.
This study was supported by the Department of Anesthesiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Anesthesia, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Marc D. Mecoli, Kirti Sahu, Joseph W. McSoley, Lori A. Aronson & Suryakumar Narayanasamy
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Department of Anesthesiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue MLC 2001, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
Marc D. Mecoli
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Study conception, study design, data collection, preparation of figures and tables: MM, SN. Data analysis, writing and editing, and approval of the manuscript: MM, SN, KS, JM, LA. All author reviewed the manuscript.
Correspondence to Marc D. Mecoli .
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
This study was conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and with the approval of the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB# 2023 − 0292). The IRB of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center waived written informed consent, as this study collected and analyzed existing data. This study adhered to the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. [ 28 ]
Not applicable.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Mecoli, M.D., Sahu, K., McSoley, J.W. et al. The use of point of care gastric ultrasound and anesthesia management in pediatric patients with preoperative fasting non-adherence scheduled for elective surgical procedures: a retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiol 24 , 237 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02628-0
Download citation
Received : 09 January 2024
Accepted : 10 July 2024
Published : 15 July 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02628-0
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1471-2253
Advertisement
Airlines, hospitals and people’s computers were affected after CrowdStrike, a cybersecurity company, sent out a flawed software update.
By Adam Satariano , Paul Mozur , Kate Conger and Sheera Frenkel
Airlines grounded flights. Operators of 911 lines could not respond to emergencies. Hospitals canceled surgeries. Retailers closed for the day. And the actions all traced back to a batch of bad computer code.
A flawed software update sent out by a little-known cybersecurity company caused chaos and disruption around the world on Friday. The company, CrowdStrike , based in Austin, Texas, makes software used by multinational corporations, government agencies and scores of other organizations to protect against hackers and online intruders.
But when CrowdStrike sent its update on Thursday to its customers that run Microsoft Windows software, computers began to crash.
The fallout, which was immediate and inescapable, highlighted the brittleness of global technology infrastructure. The world has become reliant on Microsoft and a handful of cybersecurity firms like CrowdStrike. So when a single flawed piece of software is released over the internet, it can almost instantly damage countless companies and organizations that depend on the technology as part of everyday business.
“This is a very, very uncomfortable illustration of the fragility of the world’s core internet infrastructure,” said Ciaran Martin, the former chief executive of Britain’s National Cyber Security Center and a professor at the Blavatnik School of Government at Oxford University.
A cyberattack did not cause the widespread outage, but the effects on Friday showed how devastating the damage can be when a main artery of the global technology system is disrupted. It raised broader questions about CrowdStrike’s testing processes and what repercussions such software firms should face when flaws in their code cause major disruptions.
Here’s a visual explanation for how a faulty software update crippled machines.
Share of canceled flights at 25 airports on Friday
50% of flights
Ai r po r t
Bengalu r u K empeg o wda
Dhaka Shahjalal
Minneapolis-Saint P aul
Stuttga r t
Melbou r ne
Be r lin B r anden b urg
London City
Amsterdam Schiphol
Chicago O'Hare
Raleigh−Durham
B r adl e y
Cha r lotte
Reagan National
Philadelphia
1:20 a.m. ET
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
0800 048 7804 | [email protected]
About Us Testimonials Exam Dates About CIMA Quick Purchase Basket Help Contact Us studyHUB Home
‘How to pass the case study’ mini-course
“The main reason people fail their CIMA case study exams is not lack of theoretical knowledge, not lack of pre-seen preparation – it’s poor exam technique. People just don’t know how to write answers in a way that scores marks, how to plan to focus what they say and how to manage their time across the exam to maximise marks in each section.” – Nick Best, Astranti CEO
The case studies are difficult to pass, with around 40-50% of people typically failing each sitting , and for most, it’s because they don’t fully understand what it takes to score highly in the exam.
They don’t know how to:
Having helped thousands of students pass the case study, Peter Stiff, Astranti’s case study expert, has pooled his years of experience teaching CIMA case studies and produced over 10 hours of video content to show you exactly what you need to pass your CIMA case study exam .
We’ve also written a comprehensive study guide for you to work through alongside the video series , so that you can cement your understanding and begin to apply it to your exam.
“Everything I needed was included and it helped me untangle what my priorities should be in revising, as well as teaching me the best exam techniques. Passed first time which I put down to the excellent course structure, materials, and very communicative and helpful staff.”
CIMA Case Study Student , January 2022
“I purchased the full course and it was brilliant; the preseen analysis was very useful, the exam technique was absolutely vital, and I was really grateful for the marked mocks and support from tutors (and other students on Yammer).”
CIMA Qualified , July 2022
Learn what it takes to pass
Understand what the examiner says you need to do to pass
Learn why people fail and how to avoid the same mistakes
Learn how to play your role in the exam to score highly
Perfect your exam technique
Learn the skills to master your time management
Develop your writing style to make clear focused points
Learn how to create effective answer plans
Maximise your marks
Review past students’ scripts and see how to improve yours
Learn what it really takes to pass from the examiner’s reports
See how to review your mocks to improve your answers
Take a look for yourself…
Part 1 – What does it take to pass the exam?
Chapter 1 – the keys to passing the MCS
What are the most important factors in passing the CIMA Management Case Study exam and what do you need to do to achieve that? Our first video answers these key questions as well as providing a general introduction to the exam.
Chapter 2 – the exam
In order to pass the exam you need to understand what it looks like! We review the nature of the exam and run you through what you will be faced with on exam day.
Chapter 3 – your role
CIMA provide you with a ‘role to play’ for your exam. What is that role and what does this mean for the way you answer the questions in the exam? The examiner has commented that people playing the role well score more marks, so this is critical to you passing.
Chapter 4 – how to analyse the pre-seen
The CIMA examiners regularly comment that people do not use the pre-seen information enough in their exam. We provide a step by step approach to analysing the pre-seen to get the most from it which is useful to those people who don’t use the Astranti Case Study analysis.
Chapter 5 – answering the question
The examiner’s most common criticism of student scripts is ‘not answering the question asked’. The problem is people not properly identifying the requirements – it’s harder than it sounds! This video shows you how to avoid this most common of errors.
Total video running time: over 3 hours
Part 2 – Exam planning and writing
Chapter 6 – why you must plan your answers
Planning is one of the keys to passing the CIMA Management Case Study, yet most people don’t plan. In this video, we outline why planning is so important and why it is key to passing.
Chapter 7 – the 9 stages of exam planning
Our 9 step planning approach ensures you create answers that meet all the key requirements the examiner requires from a script. Follow these steps as the first stage in producing an excellent answer.
Chapter 8 – planning practice
You will only excel at planning through practice. Having been shown how to plan, it’s now your turn! We provide a question for you to plan, run through the solution and show you what an excellent plan for that question would look like.
Chapter 9 – writing approach
Using the right writing style makes a significant difference to the mark you score. So what is the style you should use that will enable you to score the most marks from the ideas you generate? This video demonstrates the style that markers say helps them give you the most marks.
Chapter 10 – writing practice
Can you produce a script like the good scripts you’ve just been shown? You will be given a question and will be shown how to evaluate that script to ensure you are writing your answer in a way that is scoring the most marks from the points made.
Additional content – lessons from student scripts
We examine a range of student Case Study scripts. You will see the good scripts, so you’ve got a clear idea what to produce in the exam, and the bad scripts, so you can learn what not to do!
Total video running time: over 4 hours
Part 3 – Scoring high marks on the pre-seen
Chapter 11 – how is the MCS marked?
By understanding how the Management Case Study exam is marked, you can tailor your answer to ensure you pick up all the key marks and miss out things that aren’t scoring well.
Chapter 12 – time management
The most important skill to master to pass this exam is time management. That’s not just us saying that it’s the top answer to the regular post exam poll we conduct of our students. Why is this so important and how do you master your own time management in the exam? This video will show you.
Chapter 13 – the optimum approach to preparing for the MCS exam
As you approach the exam what do you need to do to prepare in the best way? We will guide you through the steps you need to take to ensure you pass.
Chapter 14 – application to the MCS
Having the ability to apply your knowledge of the theory to the pre-seen scenario is crucial when preparing for the MCS exam. This section provides a series of templates and guides for you to do just this, linking in with some of the key theory and models from operational level.
Additional content – the examiner’s analysis of a real student script
There’s nothing better than hearing what the CIMA examiner wants from your Case Study exam. Luckily the examiner has provided us with an analysis of a real exam script with her commentary on what’s good and how it can be improved. We analyse this script and her comments and pick out the key learning points so you can produce a script which meets her needs.
Additional content – the marking grid
Our marking grid is tailored to give you feedback on the key areas of exam technique required to pass the MCS exam. In this video, we review each of these key areas and show you how to use the feedback given from your marked mocks to improve.
Additional content – review of examiner post exam reports
At the end of each exam, the examiner provides guidance on the key strengths and weaknesses in that set of exams. By examining a range of reports over a number of years we learn what she is looking for from your script, what you need to do to score well and what traps you need to avoid. We also examine how her feedback has changed over the years so you understand her current thinking.
Total video running time: over 3 hours
What our students have to say…
Please see our testimonials page for our latest student reviews. Here are a couple of examples:
“I’ve just passed my SCS and couldn’t have done it without Astranti.
I purchased the full course and it was brilliant; the preseen analysis was very useful, the exam technique was absolutely vital, and I was really grateful for the marked mocks and support from tutors (and other students).
This was my first case study having completed the other levels many moons ago before they introduced case studies at every level. I’d self studied the Strategic OTs and scraped through but there’s no way I could have passed the case study on my own.”
“Fantastic course for the Operational Case Study CIMA exam. I normally study for my exams with textbooks, but as I didn’t know where to start with the first case study exam, I purchased the full Astranti OCS course, which was well worth it.
Everything I needed was included and it helped me untangle what my priorities should be in revising, as well as teaching me the best exam techniques.
Passed first time which I put down to the excellent course structure, materials, and very communicative and helpful staff.”
Passed CIMA OCS , January 2022
Purchase the ‘how to pass the case study’ mini-course
The ‘How To Pass The Case Study’ Mini-Course is also part of our MCS Premium and Essentials Courses. Head to the course page to find out more.
MCS ‘How To Pass The Case Study’ Mini-Course £165
To qualify for the pass guarantee you need to ensure you complete ALL of the following steps. Failure to complete all of these steps will mean you will not qualify.
You must complete both practice exams and one of the mock exams and send them to your allocated marker by the deadlines set out in the course schedule.
| You must not copy the mock exam solutions. If you do so this will invalidate your pass guarantee.
|
You must achieve an average mark of at least 30% in your submitted practice and mock exams. This is to ensure you are putting in enough effort.
| You must attend or watch the recorded versions of the masterclasses and make notes on the pass guarantee form.
|
Use the pass guarantee form to document your key learning points throughout your studies, submit within 1 week of the final exam. | You must confirm that you have read and understood the pass guarantee terms. |
View & Print:
1. Click the “View + Print” link to view the study text.
2. Wait for all of the pages to load , this can sometimes take a couple of minutes depending on the size of the document (scroll to the last page to ensure that every page loads).
3. Click on the print icon within the document viewer (NOT the print icon in the browser menu).
4. Follow the steps to print.
Other things to try:
Please try an alternative browser. Google Chrome and Firefox are recommended, but other browsers may also work. Updating your browser to the latest version can help your document load more quickly.
If you are using Windows XP and a version of Internet Explorer older than 9, we cannot guarantee that printing will be possible. We recommend obtaining access to a computer with at least Windows 7.
Updating to the latest version of flash can help to resolve some people’s printing issues ( download the latest version of flash .)
If your document fails to load, try clearing your cache and browser history. If your documents still do not load it may be due to the network you are on. We suggest trying to print on a different network.
If you still cannot print your document we suggest using a different computer and/or printer in case you are experiencing a hardware issue.
This Content is Locked
To access this resource you will need to purchase it, or join our complete course. Visit our quick purchase page to get the resources you need.
You must complete mock exams 1 to 3 and send them to your allocated marker by the deadlines set out in the course schedule.
| You must not copy the mock exam solutions. If you do so this will invalidate your pass guarantee.
|
You must achieve an average mark of at least 40% in your full mock exams. This is to ensure you are putting in enough effort.
| You must attend or watch the recorded versions of masterclasses 1 & 2 and make notes on the pass guarantee form.
|
Use the pass guarantee form to document your key learning points throughout your studies, submit within 1 week of the final exam. | You must confirm that you have read and understood the pass guarantee terms. |
COMMENTS
View key dates to help you plan your studies Plan your CIMA's CGMA® exams. On-demand tests are available all year. There are four windows a year when you can sit the Case Study Exams (February, May, August, and November). Within each window, exams will be available for three days, from Wednesday through Friday.
Examination timetable. Examination timetable with dates for all aspects of multiple CS windows. Open. The CGMA Study Hub keeps you on track to achieve your personal study goals.
The management question tutorial allows you to gain familiarity with the types of questions encountered in the exam. It can be used to experience the test driver and how items are presented. We have prepared two sample case study exams based on CIMA's 2019 CGMA Professional Qualification. Open the PDF to access all the supporting material you ...
What do my exam results mean. Further reading. Exam Technique. Case Study support 1 - preparing for the Case Study exam. Exam Technique. Case Study support 2 - planning a good answer. Exam Technique. Case Study support 3 - developing a fuller answer. Study Support.
Activity #3: Keep Revising Theory from Papers E2, P2 and F2. Final practice of your application skills to different theories. Activity #4 (Optional): Final Revision Webinar Ahead of Your CIMA Management Case Study Exam. Here you'll learn: The common mistakes made in the exam according to the examiner.
As part of the Management case study exam, you'll have 30 to 60 minutes to write a financial report or response to a colleague, manager, or senior executive via email. In the exam you can expect 4 tasks to answer. A good, clear, writing style is very important. Use short, digestible, paragraphs to make it easy for the marker to read, and give ...
Management Level Case Study. The case study exam tests the knowledge, skills and techniques that you've learned throughout the Management level in a role simulation. You'll be asked to respond to authentic work-based activities, mimicking a job role linked to the Management level e.g. a finance manager.
P.5 Contents Page Chapter 1 Introduction to case study exams 1 Chapter 2 Core activities and assessment outcomes 17 Chapter 3 2021 May/August variant 1 exam - pre-seen information 41 Chapter 4 2021 May/August variant 1 exam - analysis and summary of the pre-seen 65 Chapter 5 Exam day techniques 89 Chapter 6 2021 May/August variant 1 exam - walkthrough 103
Our CIMA management case study course is designed to give you the highest quality teaching, course materials and support to do just that! Our courses will help you pass with: + Expert insights into the pre-seen, key theory revision and detailed guides on how you need to approach the exam to gain extra marks.
Sleep well and relax the night before the exam. Practice thinking positively ahead of your exam - visualise success. Step 5: During Your Exam. Go into exam with confidence - even if you don't feel like it, try and act like it (trust me this works) Work quickly through your exam and aim to make lots of points.
When you've passed these, you'll have to take another case study exam - this time, the Management Case Study (MCS). Note, if you are a Master's Gateway student, the MCS is known as the CIMA Gateway Exam. The final case study in your CIMA journey will be the Strategic Case Study (SCS), and you'll sit this once you've passed P3, E3 ...
CIMA Case Study Exam Timetable 2024. There are four opportunities a year when you can sit case study exams - February, May, August, and November. Exams within each window will be available for three days, from Wednesday to Friday. February 2024 CIMA Exam Dates. Operational. Exam entry opening - August 3rd, 2023; Exam entry closing ...
A comprehensive guide to the Management Case Study for May, August, November 2021 and February 2022 exam windows. Why do I need it? To help you prepare for the MCS exam by understanding examinable topics, the assessment approach and exam weightings. Open PDF. Published 28/2/21. Level: Management. The CGMA Study Hub keeps you on track to achieve ...
CIMA 2024 Exam Timetable. There are four windows a year when you can sit the case study exams (February; May; August; and November). Within each window, exams will be available for three days from Wednesday to Friday. Pre-seen material for the case studies can be found on the Study Hub . See the below dates and mark the CIMA Exam deadlines.
Dedicated to helping you pass your case study exam. Ever since our first CIMA case study course over 14 years ago, Astranti has gained a reputation for offering the most comprehensive case study courses in the market. Our courses are dedicated to providing you with the best advice and support to help you pass your exams on the first attempt.
The purpose of the case study exam. CIMA describes the case study exam as a "role simulation". It requires candidates to "respond to authentic work-based activities presented during the examination, drawing together learning from each of the three subjects to provide solutions to the issues and challenges presented".
CIMA's Question Tutorials. Get hands-on experience of our computer-based assessments. CIMA ® offers two types of question tutorials to cover the objective tests and case study exams. The question tutorials provide you with examples of the types of questions encountered in the exam. They can be used to experience the test driver and how items ...
At this level, you'll take the CIMA E1, CIMA P1 and CIMA F1 exams (more on these in a minute!) as well as the Operational Case Study. Management Level - The focus at this level of your CIMA study turns to the implementation, monitoring and analysis of decisions - particularly how you can convert long-term decisions into medium-term ones.
Management Level Case Study. Courses from. £230.00. View and buy courses. Courses available: INTEGRATED (4) FINAL MOCK (2) Each level features a Case Study Examination, integrating knowledge, skills and techniques into one synoptic capstone examination. For this, the role simulated is a finance manager.
How to pass the Management Case Study. With the next set of exams coming up we thought it would be great to give you an overview of the management case study, also known as CGMA gateway. The aim of CIMA's CGMA Professional Management case study is to apply the knowledge you have learnt across the whole management level. The CGMA Study Hub keeps ...
Study design and population. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained prior to study commencement (IRB# 2023 − 0292). Existing records of all gastric ultrasound scans performed in perioperative patients presenting for elective surgical procedures with known NPO violation based on ASA preoperative fasting guidelines [] or unclear NPO status between December 2022 and April 2023 ...
Our MCS theory revision series: + Covers all the most important theory that you need to know for the case study exams. + Converts the key content from over 1,200 pages of syllabus study texts into just 453 pages. + Condenses the theory into manageable chunks, with around 26 hours of video to watch. + Gives you the platform to successfully apply ...
Airlines, hospitals and people's computers were affected after CrowdStrike, a cybersecurity company, sent out a flawed software update. By Adam Satariano, Paul Mozur, Kate Conger and Sheera ...
Produce answers that meet the examiner's needs. Play the role assigned in the exam. Plan effectively. Manage their time to create balanced answers. Write answers that score high marks. Having helped thousands of students pass the case study, Peter Stiff, Astranti's case study expert, has pooled his years of experience teaching CIMA case ...