Doctoral students enrolled in the program are encouraged to pursue 1 of UVM’s certificates of graduate study including, but not limited to: Ecological Economics, Community Resilience and Planning, Agroecology, Public Health, Sustainable Enterprise, Complex Systems and Data Science, and any relevant new certificate programs; or any 15-credit sequence of electives with advisor permission.
A written comprehensive examination must be passed by the candidate at least 6 months before the dissertation is submitted. Upon submission of written comprehensive exam, an oral comprehensive exam is required within 1 months’ time of submission. The oral comprehensive exam defense must be passed as well as the written exam in order to officially “pass” the comprehensive exam. Success in the written and oral comprehensive examination is a prerequisite for standing for the Dissertation Oral Defense Examination and to officially reach “doctoral candidate” status.
Students will advance to candidacy following completion of the core and elective curriculum, passage of a written and oral comprehensive exam, passage of the written dissertation and oral dissertation defense exam, and acquisition of teaching experience in the field of sustainable development policy, economics and governance. A GPA of 3.0 must be maintained.
Send Page to Printer
Print this page.
Download Page (PDF)
The PDF will include all information unique to this page.
Undergraduate Catalogue
A PDF of the entire Undergraduate catalogue.
Graduate Catalogue
A PDF of the entire Graduate catalogue.
Phd programme.
The interdisciplinary PhD programme in Sustainability Science and Policy (SSP) is designed to educate researchers, university teachers, and world leaders in the social, economic and natural science disciplines that underpin sustainable development.
The research produced by the programme’s doctoral dissertations will focus on integrative, interdisciplinary research that is needed to explore science and policy issues in sustainable development.
Integrated assessment methods and concepts (transitions, modeling, scenario analysis) will be instrumental to provide answers to the central questions of sustainable development.
Sustainability science is a new multi-disciplinary approach to science that recognizes the limitations of traditional scientific inquiry in dealing with the complex reality of social institutions interacting with natural phenomena.
Paid PhD positions (employed researchers) If there are positions available, you will find the vacancies listed here.
PhD student with alternative funding If you have confirmed funding (an estimate of the tuition fee for a 4-year PhD programme is €20.000,-) for the PhD programme you are welcome to contact us for an application package.
The programme is designed for an international student body and therefore we are interested in candidates from all over the world. The basic admission requirements are:
More information about PhD programmes at Maastricht University
Better, not more – business strategies to enable sufficient consumption.
This PhD project focuses on the role that business can play in a transition towards sufficient, sustainable consumption. Sufficiency refers to consumption that enables prosperity for all while remaining within the boundaries of planetary capacity. Sufficient consumption is needed as the current economic system is based on the continuous consumption of new products, and overconsumption of resources, which creates negative environmental and social impacts.
Businesses are key creators of demand, through their product and service offering and advertising. While many businesses have recognized the need to work towards sustainability, these efforts remain largely confined to efficiency improvements and moves towards a circular economy (consistency). This, however, is insufficient in tackling sustainability challenges, as rebound effects swallow resource and emissions savings and overconsumption remains unchallenged. This research addresses the more radical proposition of businesses acting as leaders for sufficiency, supporting their consumers to reconsider their consumption behaviour and consume differently, less, or not at all.
In the past two decades, education for sustainable development has been increasingly discussed on global, national, and regional agendas, resulting in a blossom of sustainability-related programmes and courses. Higher education graduates are expected to deal with sustainability-related societal problems during their professional and personal lives. The challenge is that these multi-faceted problems cannot be solved by individuals or using a single perspective. To produce competent professionals and improve education quality, universities put effort into defining/adopting relevant competence frameworks that include specific knowledge, skills, and attitudes. However, processes and impacts of learning still appear as Pandora’s box because: 1) Perspectives towards sustainable development are influenced by motivations, demographic, and intellectual backgrounds, but they remain inadequately assessed for the relevance to education; 2) interactions in learning environments can lead to both positive and negative outcomes for individuals, groups, and organisations, 3) complexities in real-world learning cannot be tackled without considering the direct and indirect impact of social, economic, and environmental factors.
Successful crossing of disciplinary, cultural, and professional boundaries is an encompassing competence and a promising source of learning, which has become popular in designing learning environments. Although the patterns of interactions differ, study exchange, work placement, field trips, intervention workshops, student-stakeholder projects, university-led living labs, and start-up incubators are examples of learning environments that connect different perspectives and enable mutual learning. However, they risk failing to address students’ varying initial capacity and self-efficacy, group dynamics, support/hindrance in and outside the campus, the interplay of stakeholder interests, monitoring of career trajectories, and a lack of rigorous assessments overall.
My PhD research contributes to fulfilling the said knowledge gaps, focusing on the design of learning environments and assessments for the competence of working across multiple boundaries:
Central America faces decisive moments, not only by the challenges presented in terms of poverty, insecurity, vulnerability and institutional weakness, but also it is at a key time for taking the decisions and actions necessary to build a region of sustainable development.
The region has begun to implement climate proofing for public infrastructure, at national and local level, nonetheless, the region isn’t working to incorporate the climate proofing to the spatial planning, and even, the spatial planning is weak or absent in most of the region. At the same time, the Central American countries are among the most vulnerable to the effects of climate change, and also, have a large history of impacts thanks to extreme weather conditions.
In a region as vulnerable as Central America, is of high importance the use of strategies to climate proof their efforts towards its sustainable development. Climate proofing is a term considered new for the region, the Asian Development Bank define it as:
“identifying risks to a development project, or any other specified natural or human asset, as a consequence of both current and future climate variability and extremes, and ensuring that those risks are reduced to acceptable levels through long-lasting and environmentally sound, economically viable, and socially acceptable changes implemented at one or more of the following stages in the project cycle: planning, design, construction, operation, and decommissioning.” (ADB, 2005. P. 2)
The interest of this research is to document relevant international experience incorporating climate proofing strategies to the spatial planning as part of the efforts of adaptation to climate change in cities. Based on these experience, to build a proposal to strengthen the initial efforts of the region to climate proof public infrastructure, especially, elevating the scope to include climate proofing to the spatial planning in Central America’s cities.
This PhD project is concerned with the assumptions that individual actors or actor groups involved in change initiatives towards more sustainable, just and inclusive societies hold about what is at stake and about how change can be brought about. The focus is as much on assumptions that are verbalised explicitly as on assumptions that underlie actions taken and strategies pursued.
Cases considered range from government-supported behavioural change programmes and research projects to civil society social innovation initiatives and activist groups. Findings are evaluated against a range of theories on transformative, social change from across the social sciences.
Animals had many measurable benefits to both humans and society, such as enhancing physical and psychological well-being, reducing loneliness and depression, improving animal diversity and promoting sustainable nature and society development. From another point of view, the direct presence of public attitudes toward animals, which are somewhat influenced by human culture and knowledge, can contribute to animals’ healthy dietary and decent living environment, and eventually the construction of an optimum animal welfare system. Therefore, it is clear that a better understanding of public attitudes toward animals, animal emotions, as well as what effects the influential factors have on these attitudes, are of fundamental importance to both animals and humans.
My research mainly focused on the sustainable relationships between humans and animals in China, Japan, and the Netherlands. Through this research, I want to know how people attribute emotions to animals, and how the degree of attachment influences the attribution of emotions to animals in these countries. In addition, my research also aimed at finding out Chinese, Japanese and the Dutch people’s attitudes toward animals and their influential factors, such as culture, ethical ideologies, the degree of attachment and other possible variables. Furthermore, Ecological Paw Print as an important variable to measure sustainable development will also be included in my research. Through my research, I want to find out the current situation of animals and human-animal relationships in China (as well as in the Netherlands and Japan), and therefore find ways to improve people’s awareness of animal welfare.
How can universities effectively navigate pathways of transformation for sustainability? In order to answer this question, international case-study research on pioneering universities and their networks is developing and testing a tool to help evaluate and track fundamental transformation for organisations towards more actionable outcomes across diverse aspects of sustainability. These include but are not limited to: management performance, governance, intrapreneurship and innovation, sustainability in education, inter and transdisciplinary research, communications strategies, stakeholder management and social and environmental responsibility practices.
As part of an Action research approach, structured interventions will be applied to Maastricht University with the Green Office as the implementation agents, aiming to resolve system dysfunction and improve sustainability performance.
The project deliverables, aside from publications and a thesis, will include policy recommendations, management reviews, a transdisciplinary framework for organisational transformation for sustainability at universities, and – from a four year period of observations - executive reports on institutional governance for sustainability, longitudinal organisational assessments, and knowledge on increased social impact of academia through social entrepreneurship.
This PhD will work towards my core objective: to apply action research, for intentional change and improvement, in partnership with organisations that want purpose driven into their core and are committed to a fortuitous movement for sustainable development - whether in the public, private or social sectors. I will continue close participative research with the Green Office, and my network in social enterprise, in order to perform interventions for UM's sustainability performance in 2017. After 2017, the outcomes and continuation of this work will be primarily focussed and applied where there is the most traction and willingness to undertake necessary transformative change; external to ossified administrative, bureaucratic and political systems.
The most challenging element of the energy transition is to reduce fossil fuel energy consumption in the existing housing stock because of the complexity of the system of different actors and their social practices. In this PhD research an interdisciplinary socio-technical approach is used that goes beyond technology and individual behaviour and will also tackle the physical, economic and social context of the different actors. Empirical data is collected in the case-study of Parkstad Limburg (NL) and the results are used to develop recommendations to improve the effectiveness of energy transition policies and product offerings to residents.
This PhD research originates from the argument of The World Health Organization (2016), that ‘good health of all its citizens is one of the most effective markers of any city’s sustainable development’. This calls for sustainable, health-promoting urban policies. In China, sustainable urban development (SUD) is stimulated by, for example, the National Development and Reform Commission’s ‘low-carbon pilot program’. In Europe, SUD is stimulated by, for example, the new ‘Urban Agenda for the EU’. However, decision-makers do not often apply a ‘health-lens’ to SUD policies. So how can the dual goals of healthy citizens and urban sustainability be integrated in decision-making? And how can we enhance the health co-benefits of existing and anticipated SUD policies?
Sustainability assessment (SA) is nowadays a widely used term that covers a broad range of approaches aiming to operationalize sustainability concepts for decision-making, mostly within but also outside governments. It emerged as a ‘marriage’ between environmental assessment and sustainable development (see Dijk et al 2017). These approaches may be formal or informal, legally prescribed or voluntary, science-driven or policy-driven, etc., and may carry different labels, such as sustainability appraisal, sustainability impact assessment or integrated assessment. A common feature is that they try to integrate various perspectives, interests, and types of knowledge. However, despite scholarly progress, Gibson (2016) concludes that in public and private sectors the speed of sustainable development has been rather slow in the last decade. An important way forward is the development of new and better Sustainable Assessment tools. In this project we focus on the improvement of Sustainability Assessment tools for urban mobility.
An SA is designed to form a logic sequence within an analytic and decision-making process, and within which a range of different methods can be applied. There is no single and commonly accepted procedure for sustainability assessment. A procedure may be formally prescribed by law, such as in environmental impact assessment (EIA) in many countries (but with great variety between countries) and as strategic environmental assessment under the EU SEA Directive (2001/42/EC). A broad range of methods has been applied in SA, with often combinations of methods being used within one study. However, in assessments in the public and private sector, the choice is often poorly explained and, when combining methods, often one method is clearly dominant and basically shapes the SA outcomes. A common problem identified in the literature is the lack of guidance on what methods can be used. Thus, research on how to organize and deploy tools and methods in assessments seems to have a lot of room for improvement.
Throughout human history, the ocean has always been playing a crucial role in human society. How people view the ocean is strongly correlated with how they make use of the ocean, and subsequently, what the ocean looks like now. Are we considering human as the dominator of the ocean? Or are we regarding human society and ocean as equally important? Understanding human-ocean interaction would be helpful to build a healthy relationship between human society and ocean.
However, seldom studies look into this area in current academic community. Especially the conditions in developing countries, such as China, still remain unclear. On one hand, large-scale foreign trade and annual seafood consumption justify the significance of ocean to Chinese society. On the other hand, increasing maritime disasters and resource depletion indicate the environment is far from ideal.
From three aspects, this research project targets at answering the question of how to understand and develop a sustainable human-ocean relationship. This research will assess how Chinese people perceive marine life, recognize marine economic development, and deal with modern maritime disaster. We will delineate a general picture of human-ocean relationship in contemporary Chinese society. And we would like to contribute to the discussion of how to shape a positive and robust relationship between ocean and human society.
This PhD research originates from the need to better understand the human behaviour in relation to waste management through the analysis of the huge amount of unstructured data available online (like social media and other free platforms).
Nowadays the attention to sustainable development (SD) issues is continuously increasing as demonstrated, at the supra-national level, by development of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and their inclusion in the national agenda of many nations. At the individual level, the focus on SD matters is addressed through enhanced education, improved attention to our lifestyle and to the impact of our routine actions, responsible purchasing, respectful behaviours, etc. These concerns are also demonstrated by the creation of new terms as green attitude, pro-environmental behaviour, eco-friendly attitude, green consumption, to highlight the importance of the individual behaviour in pursuing the SD, and to indicate that the development of an environmentally sustainable consumption is also dependant on consumers' willingness to engage in pro-environmental behaviours.
Actually the analysis of human behaviour is very complex and interdisciplinary, especially when considering pro-enviromental factors, as demonstrated by the huge variety of approaches and methodologies adopted by the existing scholars. In the latter years, novel expanded approaches have been proposed with the intention of including all applicable factors in the correct way. These activities are very challenging, and many scholars agree that human actions are the results of a complex economic, social, physical and psychological process, influenced by numerous and heterogenoeus factors related to environment, culture, laws, politics, geography, circumstances, emotions, intentions, just to name a few of them.
Nowadays the researches on human behaviour and its influencing factors can definitely benefits of the analysis of big data (BD). For example, it would be useful to understand from the posts on social media the reaction of the inhabitants of a town to the introduction of municipal novel waste measures, or to comprehend the influence and interactions of economic, social and psychological factors on human perceptions in relation to environmental issues.
Unfortunately the majority of data available on internet are unstructured, but they potentially contain very useful information offering a great opportunity for the advancement of researches on human behaviour.
This does not mean that the key for success is BD itself, but our challenge is to create value from it by creating transparencies and unvealing relsationships, to better understand the human behaviour thorugh the utilization of big data analysis (BDA).
For the above-mentioned reasons this research aims at understanding some specific aspects of the human behaviour by taking full advantage of the most recent big data analysis tools through an interdisciplinary approach open to the collaboration of scholars from different disciplines.
Tim is working half-time as a PhD researcher, investigating learning processes in networks of transformative social innovation initiatives like Impact Hubs, Transition Towns, TimeBanks, Hacker Spaces and Ecovillages.
This research draws on involvement with the recently completed EU-funded TRANSIT project (2014-2017), which developed an empirically grounded theory on how such social innovations relate to transformative social change. The focus lies on better understanding how network leaders can effectively shape the learning processes at various network levels for social innovations to develop transformative capacity.
Shared Value Creation and Inter-organisational Collaboration for Sustainable Business Model Innovation Myrthe Velter
Spatially Modelling the Positive and Negative Effects of Nature on Human Health: a Focus on Optimizing Urban Green Infrastructure Bram Oosterbroek
Global Sustainable Governance: Partnerships Between Fragmentation and Cohesion Ceren Pekdemir
Organisational Transformation and Systemic Change: Navigating pathways towards Sustainability for the University Alex Baker-Shelley
The OPEDUCA Concept - Basing schooling (from primary to higher) on Education for Sustainable Development in a local-to-global multi-stakeholder reality of Learning Jos Eussen
Climate and ENSO variability effect on dengue incidence in Aruba Marck Oduber
Certification contracts from an institutional economic perspective Esther Sri Astuti
Learning for sustainability: the learning process Anneloes Smitsman
Ecological Consequences of Globalization: Implications for Sustainable Development (2017) Lukas Figge | Read more
Social and Economic Effects of Coffee Certification, with a Specific Focus on the Livelihood Effects for Farmers (2017) Ibnu Muhammad | Read more
The Role of Governments on Sustainable Agriculture (2017) Atika Wijaya | Read more
The Social and Economic Effects of Palm Oil Certification, with a Specific Focus on the Livelihood Effects for Farmers (2017) Nia Hidayat | Read more
Religion and sustainable development (2017) Laura Kurth
The transition of farmers’ sustainable agricultural production behaviors: comparative cases study in China and Netherlands Jing Wang
Climate change and health: consequences and adaptation in Europe (2015) Su-Mia Akin | Download
Climate change and dengue transmission in Vietnam: an integrated assessment (2015) Toan Do Thanh | Download
A sunny future for photovoltaic systems in the Netherlands? An analysis of the role of government and users in the diffusion of an emerging technology (2014) Veronique Vasseur | Download
Stepping stone cities? Exploring urban greening and gardening as a viable contribution to global biodiversity conservation (2014) Carijn Beumer | Download
The Perspectives Method: Towards socially robust River Management. Maastricht University (2012) Astrid Offermans | Download
Regional sustainable development: Barries in Practice (Findings from policy, citizens, practitioners and monitoring) (2011) Annemarie van Zeijl-Rozema | Download
Living with Less: Prospects for Sustainability (2010) Jeanine Schreurs
Sailing on the winds of change. The Odyssey of Sustainability of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands. Maastricht University. (2010) Niko Roorda
Union democracy: The challenge of globalisation to organised labour in Ghana. (2010) Akua Britwum
Innovation in car mobility. Co-evolution of demand and supply under sustainability pressures. (2010) Marc Dijk
Climate change and tourism: Impacts and vulnerability in coastal Europe. (2010) Alvaro Moreno
The role of future studies in innovation processes Nicole Rijkens-Klomp
Research and develop solutions to sustainability challenges that bridge disciplines. Learn from leading scientists and scholars in this customizable, interdisciplinary program.
The PhD program in sustainability prepares students to become scientists and leaders in research who investigate the urgent sustainability challenges of this century. The flexible, transdisciplinary nature of the program allows students to focus on problems of interest to them, drawing upon relevant knowledge from sustainability science and a variety of disciplines. This full-time program includes a high degree of faculty interaction and collaboration.
All sustainability doctoral students gain a better understanding of the need for a transdisciplinary approach to solving sustainability challenges as well as the ability to communicate their research effectively to academic and non-academic audiences alike.
In addition to the common learning outcomes, students are able to conduct research on particular sustainability challenges using theoretical lenses and methods from sustainability science and a range of complementary disciplines. Students learn to translate sustainability challenges to tractable research questions; develop a portfolio of quantitative and qualitative research methods to address these research questions; formulate and test hypotheses; utilize rigorous elicitation methods to gather qualitative and quantitative datasets; learn to engage with stakeholders to co-produce knowledge; use statistical and other analytic techniques to analyze data; and build and apply models of social-ecological systems.
They develop expertise in the analysis of institutional policies and regulations, as well as the design of the built environment and technologies, to support sustainable development. They also develop the foundational knowledge of concepts and methods required to conduct interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research and effectively communicate their findings across academic disciplines, as well as to policymakers and the general public.
Graduates possess an advanced understanding of the dynamics of coupled social-ecological systems and use this knowledge to conduct original research to inform robust solutions to specific sustainability challenges. They are equipped to lead others in the development of sustainable strategies at the local, national and global levels.
This program may be eligible for an Optional Practical Training extension for up to 24 months. This OPT work authorization term may help international students gain skills and experience in the U.S. Those interested in an OPT extension should review ASU degrees that qualify for the STEM-OPT extension at ASU's International Students and Scholars Center website.
The OPT extension only applies to students on an F-1 visa and does not apply to students completing a degree through ASU Online.
86 credit hours, a written comprehensive exam, a prospectus and a dissertation
Required Core (11 credit hours) SOS 510 Perspectives on Sustainability (3) SOS 520 Research Design and Methods for Sustainability (3) SOS 525 Social-Ecological-Technical Systems (SETS): Domains and Interfaces (3) SOS 589 Community of Graduate Student Scholars (2)
Solutions Workshop Electives (6 credit hours)
Open Electives (45 credit hours)
Research (12 credit hours) SOS 792 Research (12)
Culminating Experience (12 credit hours) SOS 799 Dissertation (12)
Additional Curriculum Information Students take SOS 589 twice for one credit hour. For electives, students should see the academic unit for the approved course list. Other coursework may be used with the approval of the academic unit. Only six credit hours of 400-level coursework can be included in the plan of study.
When approved by the student's supervisory committee and the Graduate College, this program allows up to 30 credit hours from a previously awarded master's degree to be used for this program. If students do not have a previously awarded master's degree, the remaining coursework is to be made up of appropriate electives.
Applicants must fulfill the requirements of both the Graduate College and the College of Global Futures.
Applicants are eligible to apply to the program if they have earned a bachelor's or master's degree in any field from a regionally accredited institution. The school encourages applicants with diverse educational backgrounds and experiences that are relevant to the school's core objectives.
Applicants must have a minimum cumulative GPA of 3.25 (scale is 4.00 = "A") in the last 60 hours of their first bachelor's degree program, or a minimum cumulative GPA of 3.25 (scale is 4.00 = "A") in an applicable master's degree program.
All applicants must submit:
Additional Application Information An applicant whose native language is not English must provide proof of English proficiency regardless of their current residency.
The statement of intent should not exceed 600 words and should describe how the applicant's background will contribute to success in the program; describe how completion of the degree will support long-term career goals; elaborate on key research questions the applicant wishes to address or problems to solve as part of the plan of study; and identify potential faculty advisors.
Letters of recommendation must be from three people who can attest to the applicant's academic and professional achievements. At least one letter should be academic in nature.
Session | Modality | Deadline | Type |
---|---|---|---|
Session A/C | In Person | 12/15 | Final |
Studying abroad is encouraged for graduate students. Nearly all of the College of Global Futures faculty-directed programs offer graduate credit. In addition, the Global Education Office offers more than 50 program opportunities, with programs on every continent.
Faculty-directed programs tend to be the best fit for graduate students; taking courses with ASU professors over the summer or during academic breaks offers students close mentorship and professional network growth in many fields of study while they earn ASU credit. Exchange program participation is also possible with careful planning.
Students can find programs specific to their interests on the College of Global Futures Study Abroad webpage , and additional opportunities and information on the ASU Global Education Office website . These sites also include additional information about applying for funding to support global travel.
Graduate students are also encouraged to apply for funding for international research, study and professional development through ASU's Lorraine W. Frank Office of National Scholarships Advisement .
Professionals with expertise in sustainability frameworks and interdisciplinary research are in high demand across industries, including business, academia and government. Skills in critical thinking, teamwork, sustainability problem solving and research are valuable to businesses and institutions, many of which are in need of expertise to solve critical sustainability problems and introduce sustainability principles into their business models.
From the School of Sustainability's 2022 alumni employment survey, 100% of doctoral program respondents are employed. Of those respondents employed, 100% have jobs directly related to sustainability. Students can learn more about careers in sustainability and where graduates of sustainability doctoral programs are now employed by visiting the School of Sustainability's alumni employment data website .
Career possibilities for program graduates include:
School of Sustainability | WCPH 3rd floor [email protected] 480-727-6963 Admission deadlines
Columbia University offers a series of multidisciplinary Ph.D. program options that tap the extensive resources of our science departments and institutes, as well as those of our partners.
Sustainable Development is critically important because many of the most important policy challenges facing the planet require a central focus on sustainability and development. The new interdisciplinary Ph.D. in Sustainable Development is designed to educate researchers, university teachers, and world leaders in the social and natural science disciplines that underpin sustainable development .
Bridge the divide between natural and engineered systems: Earn a Ph.D. through the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences or an Eng.Sc.D. through the School of Engineering.
The Ph.D. program aims to train broadly educated Earth scientists for careers in academia, research, government, and industry; along the way, our students move swiftly from receiving knowledge to creating it. Students at the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences conduct research at one of three affiliated institutions: the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, or the American Museum of Natural History.
Dr.P.H. students at the School of Public Health focus on understanding and predicting the health effects of environmental and occupational exposure to chemicals and radiation. Students acquire a general background in public health, specialize in an area of interest and undertake an intensive research project. Ph.D. students develop scholarly expertise and focus on laboratory-based investigation.
The Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (EEB) program is designed to provide the broad education needed to describe, understand and conserve the Earth’s biological diversity in all its forms. Matriculating students will develop the skills to conduct ecological, behavioral, systematic, molecular and other evolutionary biological research, as well as to formulate and implement environmental policy.
Columbia has offered a Ph.D. program in Evolutionary Primatology for over a decade. Many aspects of this program are coordinated with the New York Consortium of Evolutionary Primatology (NYCEP), which provides a multi-institutional venue for graduate training leading to the Ph.D., emphasizing all aspects of the behavioral, ecological, morphological and evolutionary biology of primates.
Free digital skills training opportunity with refushe - august 2024 intake (for kenyans), leading change fellowship, yuwaah-unicef fellowship: become one of the 30 climate champions of young india.
Alf euro-mediterranean young professionals programme.
Traineeship opportunities at eurojust.
Scicomm in practice fellowship.
Youth action day - summit of the future youth participation application(funding available and open to all nationalities), apply now to become a delegate for rcoy apac 2024(funding available and open to asia-pacific region youth).
Announcing the 2024-2025 ontario community changemakers program.
Select Page
Posted by Archimella N | Jul 10, 2024 | Courses , Education , Europe , Grants , PhD , Scholarships | 0 |
Are you passionate about conducting innovative research that could shape the future of our planet? Applications are now open for the prestigious PhD in Sustainable Development and Climate Change. This unique program allows you to undertake interdisciplinary research at top Italian academic institutions, collaborating with researchers globally. Join a rapidly growing community and contribute to a sustainable future.
Program Highlights:
Application Details:
Don’t miss this chance to join a transformative research program. Apply now and be part of the future!
14th February 2023
16th June 2023
11th June 2024
25th March 2024
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Scientific Reports volume 14 , Article number: 15464 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
709 Accesses
1 Altmetric
Metrics details
The process of implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which were approved by the UN General Assembly in 2015 has not been simple, being influenced by variety of social, economic, and logistical problems. It has also been negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. There are to date no specific studies aimed at assessing the extent to which higher universities institutions in Europe are active in the SDGs implementation process. Departing from this research need, this paper reports on a study aimed at examining the current degree of engagement of European universities in the implementing the SDGs. By using a multi-methods approach, which entails a review of existing documents, a survey involving participants from 22 countries and case studies, the paper maps, documents and disseminates examples of what European universities are doing to implement the SDGs, the challenges they face, and the solutions being deployed to overcome them.
Introduction.
Sustainable development is a concept that has undergone several changes as the years have progressed, and new issues arose. Such evolution has been supported by the participation of various institutions and organisations -including universities- that have been active to implementing the principles and goals of sustainable development. As anthropogenic activity has increased, climate change has progressed, and the resultant effects are being h observed, the need for sustainability is now greater than ever before. The current pressures threaten the survival of humans now, and in future generations. The principle of sustainable development is based on socio-economic development that is in line with ecological/environmental constraints 1 .
The literal definition of sustainable development is any development that can be continued indefinitely. However, the concept has been viewed from several perspectives that have changed the meaning and resulted in numerous definitions. The most cited definition goes back to the Brundtland Report published in 1987, which regards it as “development that meets the needs of current generations without compromising the needs of future generations”. This is further explained as human development that uses resources in a regenerative manner and preserves natural systems 2 . To boost this process, the United Nations has created 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that target different aspects of life, especially those that require critical attention and action 3 .
The implementation of the SDGs commenced in 2016 following their introduction in 2015. The framework accounts for development that improved the quality of life until the year 2030. One of the major challenges faced with the SDGs is the implementation of several goals simultaneously without compromising the progress of each goal individually 4 . Researchers struggle with implementing the goals in a coherent manner that has minimal trade-offs 5 .
The 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda aims to tackle social, economic, and environmental (three pillars). Such goals were introduced as an evolution of the Millenium Development Goals (MDGs) and thus incorporated unfinished goals while tackling new challenges from present times. In doing so, global action is promoted where international collaborations are encouraged to ensure that all countries regardless of income status may achieve sustainability 6 . This significantly differs from the MDGs that focused primarily on developing countries. Furthermore, the SDGs cover a broader context since each goal has specific targets to be met while providing proper integration of the three pillars of sustainable development 7 .
The 17 SDGs were introduced as a guidance method to achieve a common goal. In doing so methods have been created to track the progress of the SDGs i.e., measuring and monitoring the achievement of goals. These methods further track practical and theoretical approaches while highlighting the trade-offs visible and finding solutions to minimise them 7 . More specifically, the SDGs call for changes in technology, lifestyle and governance while promoting innovation across all fields. This is an alternative to conventional methods of development that fell short of sustainability in previous times 8 . The goals recognise that eliminating poverty and other social issues must closely be followed with strategies that enhance health and education, diminish inequality, ensure economic growth. This must occur simultaneously with climate change preventing and adaption that preserves the natural environment 9 .
Sustainable Development has featured on the agenda of Higher Education (HE) for more than 20 years 10 , with numerous declarations having been signed by HE leaders 11 and over 42 national and international networks established dedicated to sustainability in HE 12 . The United Nations (UN) supported initiatives such as the Higher Education Sustainability Initiative (HESI) and the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) have been particularly active in promoting the SDGs within higher education 13 .
It is widely accepted that universities play a critical role in delivering the SDGs. Findler et al. 14 state that Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) have an inherent responsibility to make societies more sustainable. The UN SDSN highlights that role as consisting of four activities, namely, generating knowledge, creating current and future leaders, demonstrating impact, and driving cross-sectoral leadership 15 . Essentially, through increasingly transdisciplinary approaches, universities can build greater connections across the education, research, policy, and practice interface 10 .
University students may learn about the SDGs through both the formal and informal curriculum. Several recent publications have looked at embedding education for sustainable development (ESD) issues as a whole and matters related to the SDGs in particular, into university curricula and the key competencies required by learners to be active in driving forward the sustainability agenda 16 . Informal learning also includes the many student-led initiatives that create “communities of learning” and support interdisciplinary opportunities outside of the often-siloed nature of the formal curriculum 17 . This experiential process can enable students to better apply their learning into the future 18 .
It is increasingly argued that to achieve the ambitious targets of the SDGs, universities need to educate not just our future leaders, but current leaders and decision makers also. Capacity development and professional training opportunities have enormous potential to empower leadership to deliver on the SDGs 10 . In addition, universities can act as “Living Laboratories” supporting co-creation and interdisciplinary solutions-oriented approaches to research and learning. Universities are effectively microcosms of society and therefore can act as a testbed for innovative solutions to global challenges by convening the relevant actors within a “neutral” space 19 . These types of innovative approaches are often more successful at tackling multi-stakeholder “wicked” problems 20 . Findler et al. 14 document the breadth of ways in which HEIs can impact on SDGs across from direct impacts on research uptake by policy makers to more indirect (and less easily measured) impacts on for example social cohesion and sustainable urban development.
The paper is structured as follows. It starts by explaining the methods used within this research. It then continues by presenting the results and discussing them against the literature. The last section is dedicated to a conclusion, where the main contributions are presented, as well as some limitations and further lines of research.
This research used a multi-methods approach, which entails a review of existing literature, an international survey, and an assessment of selected case studies. First, we applied a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of scientific literature on “sustainable development goals” and “higher education” in European countries retrieved from Scopus database. We used Scopus, an online database with around 23,400 available scientific journals across all fields of research 21 . Scopus is frequently used in bibliometric research because it includes a larger number of indexed journals than Web of Science 22 . The current study was conducted on February 18th, 2022, and all data analysis, including citation analysis, was performed on that date. Documents with the words “sustainable development goal$*” or “SDG$” and “universit*” or “higher education” mentioned in the title, abstract, or keywords were retrieved from Scopus for the study period from 2015 (the year in which the United Nations adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development) to 2022. The search was limited to documents published by researchers affiliated to European universities, considering books, book chapters, reviews and journal articles, but no language restriction was imposed. The application of this search string allowed us to obtain 638 publications regarding the topic of study. The information retrieved from the Scopus database included complete data regarding citation information, bibliographical information, abstract, keywords, and references. Data in Scopus was transformed into an Excel document for analysis.
For Table 1 , which presents key information for the top five scientific peer-reviewed journals in this area, data analysis involved calculating total papers (TP), total citations (TC), citations per paper (CPP), and the SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) for each journal. This analysis allowed the authors to identify the most influential journals in the field and their relative impact based on citation metrics.
Table 2 , in turn, showcases examples of best practices to integrate the SDGs at European universities, the data was collected through a comprehensive review of initiatives undertaken by various institutions. This included a set of relevant case studies to show some examples of successful initiatives implemented by European universities. For the collection of examples, a table was designed, which entailed a specific set of information, namely the name of the university and country, and the type of SDGs work undertaken. Also, to ensure the tracing of the information, the table contains bibliographical references and weblinks. This also allows a cross-check of the information and enables readers to obtain further details. The case studies were selected aiming to show best practices in different spheres of higher education.
The authors believe that using the afore-explained literature assessment choices contributed to achieving the paper's goal by providing a comprehensive and structured understanding of the research landscape concerning the implementation of sustainable development goals in higher education. For example, the systematic review and detailed analysis allowed the authors to map out existing research, identify key trends, and highlight significant contributions and gaps. This approach not only facilitated an assessment of the current engagement levels of European universities with the SDGs but also offered insights into the challenges and solutions being deployed, thereby informing future research directions and potential practical implications.
Second, this research used an international survey developed by the research team. The purpose of this questionnaire was to assess the relationship between the SDGs and teaching and research in higher education institutions. For this purpose, the items incorporated in the questionnaire were based on a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the role of universities in fostering sustainability through teaching, research, organizational practices. To ensure the appropriateness of the items included in the survey, a group of specialists provided advice and validated the questionnaire prior to applying it for data collection. This validation process was undertaken by five internationally recognized specialists in the fields of sustainability and higher education. As a result of this validation exercise, the research team adjusted the number of sections and items within each section. Also, some of the elements were adapted to improve their suitability to the research purposes.
After addressing the suggestions made by the experts, and in order to ensure the consistency of the data, a pilot study (i.e. a pre-test) was run with five respondents. The results from this pilot test showed that the survey instrument was adequate, with minor modifications. Both phases (i.e. the validation with specialists and pilot application with additional participants) confirmed and reliability and the validity of the data gathering instrument. The final version of the survey included 22 questions, structured in four sections, namely section 1: Identification (4 items), section 2: Institutional characteristics (3 items), section 3: SDGs and teaching (6 items), and section 4: SDGs and research (9 items).
A Google Form was then developed with the confirmed survey items. A purposive sampling approach, in combination with techniques such as chain referrals and snowballing, was applied to disseminate the link to the on-line questionnaire with a global audience via the research team, the networks of the European School of Sustainability Science and Research (ESSSR), and the Inter-University Sustainable Development Research Programme (IUSDRP). Data collection was carried out from March 2022 to August 2022. Following research ethics protocols, contributors were informed that their participation in the study was voluntary, that their responses would be handled with thorough confidence, and the safety of their personal data will be always guaranteed.
The nature of the research, the methods used, and the fact that no personal data was stored or can be traced back to individuals, conforming with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) standards, means that the study is not subject to an ethics permit, as specified by the Association of Medical Ethics Committee in Germany, the body responsible for such assessments in the country leading this study. In any case, and considering any argument requesting waiving consent, all respondents willingly agreed to participate in the study, confirmed through an additional question added to the beginning of the questionnaire, presenting options for yes or no.
Third, this research included a set of relevant case studies to show some examples of successful initiatives implemented by European universities. For the collection of examples, a table was designed, which entailed a specific set of information, namely the name of the university and country, and the type of SDGs work undertaken. Also, to ensure the tracing of the information, the table contains bibliographical references and weblinks. This also allows a cross-check of the information and enables readers to obtain further details. The case studies were selected aiming to show best practices in different spheres of higher education.
Experimental protocols did not require institutional approval. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
The research approach applied in this research combines the three methods explained above. This allowed us to explore the state of the art as regards sustainability in higher education by using information from scientific literature, which was completed with the opinion of teachers, researchers, and staff from European HEIs through the survey. Also, we identified successful examples from different HEIs to illustrate how these institutions perform in key areas and what are the reasons for their success. Overall, these results allow us to understand the problems faced by HEIs, and how these barriers could be addressed by policymakers, university administrators, and other stakeholders in promoting sustainability through higher education. Therefore, this multi-method approach improved the quality of the analysis compared to other traditional methods that opt for one of these research strategies only.
As regards the literature review, most documents were research articles (n = 425; 67%), followed by conference papers (n = 101; 16%), book chapters (n = 68; 11%), reviews (n = 32; 5%), editorials (n = 7; 1%), and books (n = 3; 0′5%). The database also included one letter and one survey. Increasing interest on the topic of higher education and sustainable development goals is evident, as reflected by the constant growth in the number of publications shown in Fig. 1 .
Source: Authors elaboration using data from Scopus.
Evolution of publications and citations for the 2015–2022 period.
Regarding the top five active journals, the multidisciplinary journal Sustainability ranked first (n = 151; 36%), followed by International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education (n = 41; 10%), Journal of Cleaner Production (n = 14; 3%), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (n = 10; 2%), and International Journal of Management Education (n = 9; 2%). Table I shows key information for the top five scientific peer-reviewed journals in this area.
The top five active institutions are the University of Sevilla (n = 19), the Polytechnic University of Valencia (n = 13), the Manchester Metropolitan University (n = 13), the Hamburg University of Applied Sciences (n = 13), and the University College London Institute for Education (n = 12). Regarding institutional affiliation, the majority of papers were published by Spanish researchers (n = 196), followed by scientists from the United Kingdom (n = 143), Germany (n = 67), Italy (n = 42), and France (n = 32). Regarding financial support, the five leading funders are two European Institutions: The European Commission (n = 42) and the European Regional Development Fund (24); two Spanish public administrations: the National Agency for Research (n = 10) and the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (n = 8); and a Spanish university: the University of the Basque Country (n = 8).
The second component of this research was an international survey, which was answered by 134 respondents from 22 countries. Regarding their sociodemographic characteristics, there was a gender balance, as reflected by the fact that 49% of participants were female and 50% were male, and one participant declared other. As regards the status of the institution to which they were affiliated, 12% of them work on private higher education institutions, while 88% work on public universities. Figure 2 shows the number of responses collected all over Europe.
Survey's responses per country.
Regarding the knowledge area of affiliation, Fig. 3 shows that diverse profiles of educators and researchers answered the survey, even though education and other social sciences-related areas were the most common affiliation among respondents.
Knowledge area to which participants are affiliated.
Regarding the size of the institutions in which participants work, the results show a diverse range of HEIs. As reflected in Fig. 4 , the most common institutional size is represented by universities of up to 40,000 students (35%), followed by institutions with up to 20,000 students (21%) and up to 10,000 students (16%). The results of the survey showed that the less frequent institutional size are the largest institutions (more than 40,000 students, 15% of the sample) and the smallest ones (up to 5,000 students, 13%).
Number of students in the participant’s institutions.
As regards the question of whether the SDGs were part of their institution´s plans and/or policies, most of respondents declared that these are included in their institution´s plans and/or policies (41%), followed by those who consider that these are included to a little extent (23%), to a great extent (20%), and to a very great extent (12%). Only 4% of respondents stated that the SDGs are not part of their institution´s plans and/or policies at all. In line with this, regarding the question of whether their institutions have SDGs Promoters or Champions, 51% of HEIs recognize this figure or role, while in 49% of institutions this category does not exist.
The survey included 6 questions about the connection between the SDGs and teaching. The first question within this category was designed to evaluate the participants’ opinion regarding a set of statements. The results of this question are presented by Fig. 5 . Clearly, there is a relatively high consensus (reflected by participants declaring either 4 or 5) as regards most of the statements, except for the case of whether students ask for more teaching content related to the SDGs. Regarding this item, not only the opinions were more diverse, but instead, a relevant number of participants declared that indeed they do not perceive that the students ask for more teaching content connected to the SDGs.
Participants’ level of agreement. Note: Numbers represent percentages. (Scale:1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree).
The survey also included a question regarding to which extent the participants apply each SDG in their teaching. Figure 6 shows that it is possible to identify three clusters. First, SDGs that are addressed at a large extent in teaching activities (SDGs 11, 12, and 13); second, SDGs that are included at a moderate extent (SDGs 3 to 10, and 17); and third, SDGs that are less frequently addressed (SDGs 1, 2, 14, 15, and 16).
Application of each SDG in teaching. Note: Numbers represent percentages. (Scale: 1 = Not at all, 2 = To a little extent, 3 = To a moderate extent, 4 = To a great extent, 5 = To a very great extent).
When asked about the best approach to promote teaching about the SDGs in the higher education context, most of participants (68%) declared that SDGs-related content should be distributed across all courses and disciplines. 16% of respondents consider that it should be addressed in a mandatory discipline offered to all courses, 10% suggest that it should be delivered through an optional discipline offered to all courses, while 7% have preferences for other approaches.
In this context, participants were also asked about their perception regarding the support currently offered to academic staff in their institutions to teach about the SDGs. Most of participants declared that support is either poor (39%) or acceptable (34%). In contrast, 9% consider that it is good, and only 2% perceived it as very good. 16% of respondents declared it to be very poor.
Against this background, the survey included a question regarding the challenges for the implementation of the SDGs in their teaching. The most relevant challenge was the lack of connection between the courses and the goals (49%), followed by lack of knowledge in how to properly conduct teaching on the SDGs (42%), lack of support from the administration (39%), lack of materials or resources (28%), and lack of interest or motivation from students (23%). 8% of participants do not identify any challenges, while 8% of them perceive other challenges that were not suggested in the survey, such as lack of time, and lack of proper training. Related to this, we asked participants how they would expect the emphasis given to the SDGs in their teaching to develop until 2030. Most of them (78%) believe that it is likely to increase, 16% consider that it is likely to remain at the same level, and only 5% think that it is likely to decrease.
The survey included 9 questions regarding the connection between the SDGs and research. The first question in this section aimed to measure the extent to which participants perceive opportunities for research about the SDGs. Only 126 participants answered to this question, and the results are shown in Fig. 7 . Four key areas received a relatively large consensus by participants. The statement for which the largest number of participants reported the highest levels of agreement was “I have voluntarily connected the SDGs with my research or created new research studies based on the goals”, showing the relevant role that the participants’ own interests and motivation play in strengthening research about the SDGs. In line with this, the results show that participants perceive the SDGs as an opportunity for increased research collaborations with different stakeholders. In this context, the most relevant area for this are different programs or units within the participants’ universities, or collaboration with communities, businesses, and NGOs. Next, although with a slightly lower level of support, participants identify the SDGs as an opportunity for increased collaboration with other universities or HEIs.
Participants' perception of research opportunities regarding the SDG. Note: Numbers represent percentages. (Scale:1 = Strongly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly agree).
The subsequent questions regarding the connection between the SDGs and research were responded by 124 participants. As regards to what extent respondents apply each SDG in their research, Fig. 8 shows that SDGs 11, 12, and 13 are the ones that a larger number of participants address in their research. Some other SDGs are still relevant, even though less present in research activities undertaken by respondents (SDGs 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 17), while SDGs 1, 2, 5, 6, 14, 15, and 16 are the objectives addressed by a smaller number of researchers.
Participants' application of SDGs in research. Note: Numbers represent percentages. (Scale: 1 = Not at all, 2 = To a little extent, 3 = To a moderate extent, 4 = To a great extent, 5 = To a very great extent).
The questionnaire contained a question designed to assess the respondents’ opinion regarding the support currently offered to academic staff to research about the SDGs. In this regard, 44% of respondents consider that it is poor; 29% perceive it as acceptable; 14% declared it to be very poor; 10% think that it is good; and only 4% recognise that it is very good. Against this background, the survey included a question regarding the best approach to promote research about the SDGs in you’re the participants’ education context. 51% of respondents considered that the best option is to distribute it across all research projects or programmes, while 42% of them believe that it may be better to have an institutional centre dedicated to supporting and connecting research on the SDGs. 7% of respondents perceive that the best option is to combine both approaches, or opt for other specific alternatives. To better understand the implications of these perceptions, we asked the participants their opinion as regards the main challenges for the implementation of the SDGs in their research. The main challenge is the lack of support from the administration (48%), followed by lack of connection between research and the SDGs (42%), lack of materials and resources (23%), and lack of interest or motivation from students (17%). 11% of participants do not perceive any challenge, while 10% perceive other reasons, such as for example the lack of central leadership, the lack of funding, and the difficulty to get funding if research is of multi-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary nature. Nevertheless, we also asked the participants about their expectations regarding the emphasis given to the SDGs in their research to develop until 2030, and a large share of them (78%) believe that it is likely to increase. In contrast, 20% consider that it is likely to remain at the same level, while only 2% believe that it is likely to decrease.
The survey included a question regarding the main information sources used by participants to receive information about the SDGs. This question was answered by 119 participants, and the results are shown in Fig. 9 . It is clear that there are three main sources of information used for gathering information about the SDGs: reports, institutional sources, and scientific journals, followed by books and guidance documents published by relevant stakeholders.
Information sources used to receive information about the SDGs. Note: Numbers represent percentages. (Frequency of use: 1 = not at all, 2 = seldom, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = very often).
We also asked participants whether they get information from networks about the SDGs. As shown in Fig. 10 , the European School of Sustainability Science and Research is the most popular network for these purposes, followed y the Sustainable Development Solutions Network and the European Network on Higer Education for Sustainable Development.
Use of networks to receive information about the SDGs. Note: Numbers represent number of responses.
The survey also included a question regarding to which measures of success does the participants’ institution use to demonstrate the benefit of embedding the SDGs in Higher Education. The Times Higher Impact Rankings is the most popular measure, as declared by 43% of respondents, followed by the EAUC Green Gown Awards (18%), the People and Planet University League, UK (14%), the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment and Rating System (12%), and the United Nations Academic Impact (11%). 25% of participants declared other methods, and 16% stated that their institutions do not use any measure of success.
Finally, we asked participants regarding their opinion about the future use of digitalisation as a tool to teach or undertake teaching and research on the SDGs (e.g., Information and Communication Technologies, Distance Learning). A large share of participants (76%) believe that it is likely to increase, 21% consider that it is likely to remain at the same level, while 3% think that it is likely to decrease.
The last research component included 8 case studies selected to show best practices implemented by European universities in areas such as teaching, research, training, institutional practices, or multi-stakeholder alliances. Regarding research initiatives, the Hamburg University of Applied Sciences (HAW) started an international program to accelerate the implementation of the SDGs, and one of the main axes of this project is the Encyclopedia of the UN SDGs , a global effort to boost knowledge about sustainability and the SDGs. On a different standpoint, the University of Leeds has implemented over 160 research projects in more than 30 countries in recent years aiming to foster cross-cutting research, enhance international collaboration and promote economic development, with a strong focus on the Global South. As regards the SDGs and teaching, the Manchester Metropolitan University was the first university in the world that started a program focused on carbon literacy. This program uses peer-to-peer training, and is designed to help their students, other universities, and other relevant stakeholders. From a different perspective, the Aalborg University implemented an innovative pedagogical model that addresses real-life issues using problem- and project-based learning. In line with this, the University of Edinburgh created the Learning for Sustainability Scotland program, recognized by the United Nations as one of its Regional Centres of Expertise for Education for Sustainable Development. Training activities for teachers, researchers and staff are another sphere in which universities are very active. One example of this is the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals for University Teachers (ImpSDGup) of the University of Girona, designed to help teachers integrate sustainability-related concepts and activities in their teaching. Regarding institutional practices and strategies, the University of Cork was the first university ever to be awarded as a Green Flag by the Foundation for Environmental Education, because of the launch of its Green Campus Program. In parallel to this, alliances between different stakeholders are key for accelerating the implementation of the 2030 Agenda, as stated by SDG 17. One good example of these strategies are the city-university partnerships promoted by the Leuphana University of Lüneburg. Table 2 shows the details of these examples.
The literature review showed that interest in sustainability-related topics has increased exponentially over the last few years. At the same time, it highlighted the relevance of research articles as the main documents addressing these issues. It also revealed the prominence of several scientific journals that several scientific journals that have a clear focus on sustainability or have included sustainability as one of the main criteria they use when making decisions on whether to publish scientific studies. This is in line with the same trends in other areas of knowledge, where sustainability is becoming increasingly relevant for research.
Regarding the survey, the data collected from 134 respondents across 22 countries offers a comprehensive insight into the various facets of SDG implementation in European universities. SDGs are usually viewed as an extremely useful tool for universities to increase cooperation and networking with other organizations – first of all, with other educational institutions and non-governmental organizations to develop new research, facilitate knowledge and technology transfer 23 , 24 . The absence of network cooperation with external organizations is frequently cited as obstacles to the successful implementation of SDGs within universities 25 . Consequently, European scholars perceive SDGs as an opportunity to enhance teaching and research collaboration between various units and programs within their institutions, as well as with other universities in their region or country, Non-governmental organisations (NGOs), communities, and businesses (Figs. 5 , 7 ).
In order to effectively integrate the principles of SDGs into teaching, it is necessary to develop appropriate curriculum structures and materials 26 . As a result, approximately half of the respondents reported that their course curricula have been revised to incorporate SDGs (Fig. 4 ). This supports previous findings that universities are still lagging behind in offering courses that fully integrate SDGs into their curricula 27 , 28 , 29 . Studies have shown that the inclusion of SDG principles into curricula is more effective when implemented at a higher level, such as at the academic program, department, or university level 30 . However, most respondents reported that they voluntarily revised the content of their courses without external pressure (Fig. 4 ). Quite similarly, individual researchers usually voluntarily connect SDGs with their research (Fig. 6 ).
SDG13 Climate Action is the most widely applied SDG in teaching and research at European universities, as shown in Figs. 5 and 7 . Although climate change issues are rarely included in the general education curriculum at universities 31 , 32 , global warming remains one of the most popular environmental topics and therefore, focus of SDG teaching and research. The next two most applied SDGs in teaching and research at European universities are SDG12 Responsible Consumption and Production and SDG11 Sustainable Cities and Communities, which are often related to economics and management courses.
Most respondents agree with the dominant view that interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary learning settings, which go beyond a single academic course 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 are a better approach to fostering education for sustainable development. However, there is no consensus regarding research on SDGs, specifically whether they should be included in all research programs or concentrated in a single research center.
The survey results confirm previous studies regarding the existence of institutional obstacles to the implementation of SDGs at universities, both in teaching and research. The most significant barriers include poor financial support and a general lack of interest in sustainable development from university administrations and colleagues 25 , 27 , 37 , 38 . However, the reported lack of interest in SDGs from students and their promotion of research opportunities, as shown in Figs. 4 and 6 , is a concerning sign that may require changes in teaching approaches of SDGs. Nonetheless, most respondents are optimistic that the role of SDGs in teaching will increase.
The Internet, in general, has become a prevailing source of information about SDGs for many, including educators 39 . Although social media can be effective for dissemination SDG-related information towards students and general public 40 educational professionals in Europe primarily rely on academic sources such as peer-reviewed articles, official reports and institutional sources (Fig. 8 ).
Participation in cross-institutional networks, initiatives, and alliances is important for implementation of SDGs in universities and explicitly encouraged in SDG17 Partnerships for the Goals 41 . Although European scholars receive information about SDGs from many networks, two of the them are the most popular (Fig. 9 )—European School of Sustainability Science and Research 42 and Sustainable Development Solutions Network 15 .
University rankings provide a systematic approach to evaluating the performance of higher education institutions. However, among existing rankings, those that value sustainability are scarce 43 , 44 . The Times Higher Education Impact Rankings, one of the few academic rankings that assess universities’ performance in sustainable development, is currently considered the most popular international ranking system for measuring the integration of SDGs in universities.
Numerous studies have demonstrated the increasing role of digitalization, including e-learning, in teaching SDGs 41 , 45 , 46 . Similarly, respondents from European universities have expressed their belief that the use of digitalization as a tool for teaching and conducting research on SDGs will continue to grow.
From the strict point of view of HEI’s internal management and operations, these results point out the need to increase cooperation among different departments, services, and units within the institution, and to increase cooperation with other HEIs from different contexts. To accomplish this, it may be useful to implement an internal survey to gather information on this topic among all levels of the university community. This will also allow the identification of priorities, bottlenecks, and objectives among teachers, researchers, and staff. Also, these results suggest that it becomes crucial for HEIs to create and promote networks for enhancing cooperation with other stakeholders from outside academia, both from the public and private sectors. This will help HEIs to improve the implementation of the SDGs internally, but at the same time will contribute to strengthening the role that HEIs can play in fostering synergies with other actors out of university campuses.
As regards teaching and learning activities, we identified that, even though around half of the participants in the survey declared that they have updated their curricula to include SDG-related content, these results show that there is still a large room for improvement. Therefore, HEIs could develop training programs and provide guidance to support researchers, teachers, and staff in updating study plans and syllabuses under the umbrella of the 2030 Agenda. In line with this, it may be wise to develop mechanisms to foster interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary learning settings. This may require updating study plans and increasing flexibility and creativity for course recognition among different degrees and faculties. To do so, implementing faculty-wide or campus-wide courses could be a powerful approach.
Finally, the analysis of the case studies offered some insights into several successful experiences executed by HEIs in spheres such as teaching, research, training, institutional practices, or multi-stakeholder alliances. These initiatives prove that universities and other HEIs can foster the achievement of the SDGs and, hence, accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. As explained, this could be done by promoting research; enhancing teaching and learning for ESD; applying science in diverse projects; increasing cooperation with public and private stakeholders; fostering the development of international, inter-disciplinary, and multi-disciplinary networks; creating research centers and institute with a focus on sustainability; and providing training and support for teachers, researchers, and staff. Overall, these examples show the manyfold approaches that HEIs could adopt to promote sustainability at several levels and the pivotal role that they can play in enhancing synergies with different stakeholders and economic sectors.
This paper reports on a study aimed at examining the current degree of engagement of European universities in the implementing the SDGs. It has used a multi-methods approach, consisted of a review of existing documents, a survey involving participants from 22 countries and case studies.
The remit of the paper is to map, document and disseminates examples of what European universities are doing to implement the SDGs, the challenges they face, and the solutions being deployed to overcome them. From the evidence gathered from the paper, some main conclusions can be made. The first, is that it is encouraging to see that the number of institutions which do not seem to take the SDGs into account is rather small, and that over 30% of the sample currently handle the SDGs to a great or very great extent. This is an encouraging sign. The second conclusion which can be drawn relates to the fact that the emphasis given to the SDGs in teaching does very, and some SDGs (e.g., SDGs 1, 2, 14, 15, and 16) seem to be less frequently addressed. Also, the study has shown that some SDGs are quite present as far as research is concerned (i.e., SDGs 11, 12, and 13), whereas others (SDGs 1, 2, 5, 6, 14, 15, and 16) are being addressed by a smaller number of researchers. The final conclusion from the paper is that less than 15% of the sample stated they received institutional support to the SDGs. This is a worrying trend, since lack of support is known to be an obstacle for engagement (Leal Filho et al. 2023).
The paper has some limitations. One of them is the fact that the review of the documents focused on the SDGs and not on general sustainability issues. Also, the survey sample, with just over 100 respondents cannot be regarded as very comprehensive. Moreover, the case studies focused on what European universities are doing and did not investigate practices in other geographical regions.
Future studies may focus on what universities in other geographical regions (e.g., The Americas, Africa and Middle East or the Asia–Pacific region) are doing. They may also investigate the existing barriers to the integration of the SDGs in university study programmes. This may be helpful in building a profile of the extent to which universities around the world are engaged in the delivery of the SDGs, and in identifying the means to accelerate this delivery.
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Klarin, T. The concept of sustainable development: From its beginning to the contemporary issues. Zagreb. Int. Rev. Econ. Bus. 21 , 67–94 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
Mensah, J. Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. http://www.editorialmanager.com/cogentsocsci 5 , (2019).
Moyer, J. D. & Hedden, S. Are we on the right path to achieve the sustainable development goals?. World Dev. 127 , 104749 (2020).
Leal Filho, W. et al. When the alarm bells ring: Why the UN sustainable development goals may not be achieved by 2030. J. Clean. Prod. 407 , 137108 (2023).
Allen, C., Metternicht, G. & Wiedmann, T. Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries. Sustain. Sci. 13 , 1453–1467 (2018).
Halkos, G. & Gkampoura, E. C. Where do we stand on the 17 sustainable development goals? An overview on progress. Econ. Anal. Policy 70 , 94–122 (2021).
Barbier, E. B. & Burgess, J. C. Introduction to the SDGs. In Economics of the SDGs 3–13 (Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78698-4_1 .
Chapter Google Scholar
Kroll, C., Warchold, A. & Pradhan, P. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies?. Palgrave Commun. 5 , 1–11 (2019).
United Nations. THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/goals (2018).
Mader, C. & Rammel, C. Brief for GSDR 2015. Transforming Higher Education for Sustainable Development . (2014).
Lozano, R., Lozano, F. J., Mulder, K., Huisingh, D. & Waas, T. Advancing higher education for sustainable development: International insights and critical reflections. J. Clean. Prod. 48 , 3–9 (2013).
Leal Filho, W. et al. Implementing climate change research at universities: Barriers, potential and actions. J. Clean. Prod. 170 , 269–277 (2018).
El-Jardali, F., Ataya, N. & Fadlallah, R. Changing roles of universities in the era of SDGs: Rising up to the global challenge through institutionalising partnerships with governments and communities. Health Res. Policy Syst. 16 , 1–5 (2018).
Findler, F., Schönherr, N., Lozano, R., Reider, D. & Martinuzzi, A. The impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development: A review and conceptualization. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 20 , 23–38 (2019).
SDSN. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. About Us. https://www.unsdsn.org/about-us (2023).
UNESCO. Education for Sustainable Development Goals. Learning Objectives . (2017).
Gramatakos, A. L. & Lavau, S. Informal learning for sustainability in higher education institutions. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 20 , 378–392 (2019).
Ely, A. V. Experiential learning in “innovation for sustainability”: An evaluation of teaching and learning activities (TLAs) in an international masters course. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 19 , 1204–1219 (2018).
Purcell, W. M., Henriksen, H. & Spengler, J. D. Universities as the engine of transformational sustainability toward delivering the sustainable development goals: “Living labs” for sustainability. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 20 , 1343–1357 (2019).
Leal Filho, W. et al. The role of transformation in learning and education for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 199 , 286–295 (2018).
ElSevier. Scopus | La mayor base de datos de bibliografía revisada por pares. https://www.elsevier.com/es-es/solutions/scopus (2023).
Clarivate. Clarivate—data, insights and analytics for the innovation lifecycle. https://clarivate.com/ (2023).
Booth, A. et al. Action learning partnerships: Carbon, commerce and community co-learning at a Canadian university. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 21 , 943–957 (2020).
de Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O. et al. A proposal of a Balanced Scorecard for an environmental education program at universities. J. Clean. Prod. 172 , 1674–1690 (2018).
Leal Filho, W. et al. Identifying and overcoming obstacles to the implementation of sustainable development at universities. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 14 , 93–108 (2017).
Thomas, I. Sustainability in tertiary curricula: What is stopping it happening?. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 5 , 33–47 (2004).
Ávila, L. V. et al. Barriers to innovation and sustainability at universities around the world. J. Clean. Prod. 164 , 1268–1278 (2017).
Capdevila, I., Bruno, J. & Jofre, L. Curriculum greening and environmental research co-ordination at the Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona. J. Clean. Prod. 10 , 25–31 (2002).
Müller-Christ, G. et al. The role of campus, curriculum, and community in higher education for sustainable development—A conference report. J. Clean. Prod. 62 , 134–137 (2014).
de la Harpe, B. & Thomas, I. Curriculum change in universities: Conditions that facilitate education for sustainable development. J. Educ. Sustain. Dev. 3 , 75–85 (2009).
Henderson, J. A., Bieler, A. & McKenzie, M. Climate change and the Canadian higher education system: An institutional policy analysis. Can. J. Higher Educ. 47 , 1–26 (2017).
Hess, D. J. & Collins, B. M. Climate change and higher education: Assessing factors that affect curriculum requirements. J. Clean. Prod. 170 , 1451–1458 (2018).
Adomßent, M. et al. Emerging areas in research on higher education for sustainable development—management education, sustainable consumption and perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe. J. Clean. Prod. 62 , 1–7 (2014).
Aktas, C. B. Reflections on interdisciplinary sustainability research with undergraduate students. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 16 , 354–366 (2015).
Noy, S., Patrick, R., Capetola, T. & McBurnie, J. Inspiration from the classroom: A mixed method case study of interdisciplinary sustainability learning in higher education. Aust. J. Environ. Educ. 33 , 97–118 (2017).
Steiner, G. & Posch, A. Higher education for sustainability by means of transdisciplinary case studies: An innovative approach for solving complex, real-world problems. J. Clean. Prod. 14 , 877–890 (2006).
Aleixo, A. M., Leal, S. & Azeiteiro, U. M. Conceptualization of sustainable higher education institutions, roles, barriers, and challenges for sustainability: An exploratory study in Portugal. J. Clean. Prod. 172 , 1664–1673 (2018).
Dahle, M. & Neumayer, E. Overcoming barriers to campus greening: A survey among higher educational institutions in London, UK. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 2 , 139–160 (2001).
Smaniotto, C. et al. Sustainable development goals and 2030 agenda—Survey on awareness, knowledge and attitudes of Italian teachers of public mandatory schools, 2021. Sustainability 14 , 7469 (2022).
Hamid, S., Ijab, M. T., Sulaiman, H., Md Anwar, R. & Norman, A. A. Social media for environmental sustainability awareness in higher education. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 18 , 474–491 (2017).
Holmes, J. et al. Online learning and teaching for the SDGs—exploring emerging university strategies. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 23 , 503–521 (2022).
Leal Filho, W. Living labs for sustainable development: The role of the European School of Sustainability Sciences and Research. In Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development (eds Leal Filho, W. et al. ) 3–9 (Springer, Berlin, 2020).
Bautista-Puig, N., Orduña-Malea, E. & Perez-Esparrells, C. Enhancing sustainable development goals or promoting universities? An analysis of the times higher education impact rankings. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 23 , 211–231 (2022).
De la Poza, E., Merello, P., Barberá, A. & Celani, A. Universities’ reporting on SDGs: Using THE impact rankings to model and measure their contribution to sustainability. Sustainability 13 , 2038 (2021).
Ahel, O. & Lingenau, K. Opportunities and challenges of digitalization to improve access to education for sustainable development in higher education. In Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development (eds Leal Filho, W. et al. ) 341–356 (Springer, 2020).
Barth, M. & Burandt, S. Adding the “e-” to learning for sustainable development: Challenges and innovation. Sustainability 5 , 2609–2622 (2013).
Leal Filho, W. et al. Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 26 , 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1505674 (2018).
Leal Filho, W. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals | Book series home. https://www.springer.com/series/15893 (2021).
Dunk, R. M., Mörk, J. & Price E. A. C. Carbon Literacy: Peer-to-peer training facilitates access for all staff and students (2021).
Bertel, L. B., Kolmos, A. & Boelt, A. M. Emerging PBL futures: Exploring normative scenario development as an apporach to support transformation in problem-based learning and higher education. J. Problem Based Learn. Higher Educ. 9 (2021).
Green Campus Office. The Green Campus Programme. Smarter Sustainable Campus Communities: A Guide for Campuses Embarking on the Green-Campus Programme . (2021).
The Avondhu. UCC celebrates 10 years since becoming the world’s first Green Flag campus—The Avondhu Newspaper. https://avondhupress.ie/ucc-celebrates-10-years-since-becoming-the-worlds-first-green-flag-campus/ (2020).
Parker, D. J. et al. The African SWIFT project: Growing science capability to bring about a revolution in weather prediction. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 103 , E349–E369 (2022).
Chrsitie, B. et al. From rhetoric to reality: Examining the policy vision and the professional process of enacting learning for sustainability in Scottish schools. Scott. Edu. Rev. 51 , 44–56 (2019).
Expósito, L. M. C. & Sánchez, J. G. Implementation of SDGs in university teaching: A course for professional development of teachers in education for sustainability for a transformative action. Sustainability 12 , 8267 (2020).
Keeler, L. W. et al. Transferring sustainability solutions across contexts through city-university partnerships. Sustainability 10 , 2966 (2018).
Download references
This section has been left blank to guarantee anonymity. This paper is part of the 100 papers to implement climate change mitigation and adaptation initiative.
Authors and affiliations.
European School of Sustainability Science and Research, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany
Walter Leal Filho, Javier Sierra, João Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio & Amanda Lange Salvia
Department of Natural Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK
Walter Leal Filho & Elizabeth Price
Research Center for Global Governance; Educational Research Institute: Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Law, University of Salamanca, Paseo Tomas y Valiente, Salamanca, Spain
Javier Sierra
Department of International Relations and Public Administration, International University of Sarajevo, Hrasnička Cesta 15, 71210, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Aliaksandr Novikau
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences (BEES), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Maria Kirrane
Environmental Research Institute (ERI), University College Cork, Lee Road, Cork, Republic of Ireland
Fernando Pessoa Research, Innovation and Development Institute (FP-I3ID), University Fernando Pessoa (UFP), Praça 9 de Abril 349, 4249-004, Porto, Portugal
Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis
Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre (MARE), University of Coimbra, Edifício do Patronato, Rua da Matemática, 49, 3004-517, Coimbra, Portugal
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
W.L.F. conceived the study. W.L.F., J.S., E.P., J.H.P.P.E., A.N., M.K., M.A.P.D., and A.L.S. wrote the main manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Correspondence to Javier Sierra .
Competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Filho, W.L., Sierra, J., Price, E. et al. The role of universities in accelerating the sustainable development goals in Europe. Sci Rep 14 , 15464 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65820-9
Download citation
Received : 13 March 2024
Accepted : 24 June 2024
Published : 05 July 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65820-9
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.
The project establishes a real-world lab for urban development in Hoyerswerda, aiming to be a model for structural transformation in the Lausitz region.
The project aims to lay the foundations for a real-world laboratory focused on urban and peri-urban development for the city of Hoyerswerda in Germany. This endeavour seeks to be a transferable example of successful structural transformation within the Lausitz region.
Across the globe, comprehensive solutions for participatory and sustainable urban development are in high demand, with ongoing research and model testing. However, in Germany, sectoral boundaries have remained largely unchallenged. Prominent initiatives in ecological and socio-economic urban and spatial development have been limited to specific thematic areas. While such initiatives are commendable, they have provided only partial solutions so far. The NewCityConcepts project aims to establish the groundwork for a cross-sectoral, integrative, and participatory methodology. It will explore how knowledge-based and expert-guided urban and spatial planning can creatively and inclusively address the complex challenges of building sustainable cities.
The core of this project is to confront the multifaceted ecological and socio-economic challenges through a civic dialogue involving experts from all relevant disciplines. The goal is to generate resilient urban solutions at all levels, with regional, national, and international impact. The project seeks to:
Develop a process methodology and a concrete project plan while considering existing and ongoing conceptual work Identify, develop, and potentially locate pilot projects within Hoyerswerda’s environment through the project consortium Describe, visualise, and publicise Hoyerswerda’s development potential as a model city for structural transformation and beyond
The process methodology will be developed through a selected thematic focus, initially addressing the challenges of climate-resilient urban neighbourhoods, participatory food production in urban spaces, and water management. Three ideas that have been identified are vertical farming, urban gardening, and aquaponics. Key components of the project, building upon existing foundations and planning, include the development of workshop formats and conducting transparent internal and external dialogue workshops on goals and guiding principles with key stakeholders from the city and region in suitable formats, among others.
The project is funded by the Sächsische Aufbaubank (Saxon Development Bank).
Related content.
BIG IDEAS Series
23 Jul 2024, 18:00 - 19:00
05 Jul 2024
04 Jul 2024
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The PhD program in Sustainable Development is for those looking to pursue rigorous scholarship and research at the boundary between social and natural sciences. Students should have an interest in pursuing academic careers in interdisciplinary graduate and undergraduate programs with a focus on policy and the environment as well as in the more ...
The PhD in Sustainable Development at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) is a unique and innovative program that combines rigorous interdisciplinary training with practical application. This program provides a comprehensive education in both the social and natural sciences, preparing students to address complex sustainable development challenges.
The Sustainable Development Policy, Economics and Governance (SDPEG) Ph.D. program offers a transdisciplinary doctoral education in the policies, practices and theories of sustainable development. By offering a core curriculum that includes applied policy and economic analysis, governance and process design, social science methods, and ...
Applicants for the PhD in Sustainability Science are required to have met the following requirements by the application deadline in order to be considered: 1. A completed master's degree (or equivalent) from a recognized university or institution of higher education in a field related to sustainability and a minimum of two years of ...
Overview. Our Environment and Sustainability Ph.D. equips students with diverse perspectives to develop profound new ideas, knowledge and approaches to the most important concerns facing people and the planet. The program provides training to develop deep understandings of the structures of current environment and sustainability issues today ...
The PhD in Sustainable Development includes a set of rigorous core requirements in the social and natural sciences designed to provide a deep understanding of the interaction between natural and social systems, and provides students with the flexibility to pursue in-depth research in a broad variety of critical policy areas. No other doctoral ...
Africa Asia Europe Latin America North America Oceania. Find the list of all PHD Programs in Sustainable Development with our interactive Program search tool. Use the filters to list programs by subject, location, program type or study level.
The PhD in Sustainable Development combines a traditional graduate education in the social sciences, particularly economics, with study in the natural sciences and engineering, to prepare scholars who are uniquely situated to undertake serious research and policy assessments in furthering the goal of sustainable development. ...
Our Global Sustainable Development MPhil/PhD is for those driven to develop innovative approaches to complex challenges of sustainable development. With the support of a supervisory team, you will work on a transdisciplinary project addressing a sustainability challenge. Through structured training, you will be equipped to integrate methods and ...
Doctoral (PhD) The 2023 PhD cohort next to Douglas Lake at the University of Michigan Biological Station. The goal of the SEAS PhD in Environment and Sustainability is to train the next generation of research leaders for impact in our field. The Doctoral Program develops the creative abilities of exceptional students, training them for ...
Scholarship in applied sustainable development. The PhD in Sustainability Management (SUSM) prepares future sustainability innovators with interdisciplinary research skills, management approaches, strategies and processes to realize sustainable outcomes with business, government and third sector organizations.
The PhD program in sustainability prepares students to become scientists and leaders in research who investigate the urgent sustainability challenges of this century. The flexible, transdisciplinary nature of the program allows students to focus on problems of interest to them, drawing upon relevant knowledge from sustainability science and a ...
Sustainable Development is a branch of Environmental Studies and Earth Sciences that focuses on solving issues of Ecology, Biodiversity, and Conservation, tapping into the natural resources the Earth already has and using them to their full potential. Sustainable Development is an interdisciplinary field, involving knowledge from Environmental ...
Career Paths. This program is ideal for professionals enthusiastic about producing evidence-based analysis to investigate the social and ecological dimensions of sustainable transformations, the relationship of science and society in advancing more sustainable futures, and novel and inclusive approaches to community-based problem solving and sustainable development.
The PhD in Sustainable Development combines a traditional graduate education in the social sciences, particularly economics, with study in the natural sciences and engineering, to prepare scholars who are uniquely situated to undertake serious research and policy assessments in furthering the goal of sustainable development.
The Sustainable Development Policy, Economics, and Governance (SDPEG) Ph.D. program offers a transdisciplinary doctoral education in the policies, practices and theories of sustainable development. By offering a core curriculum that includes applied policy and economic analysis, governance and process design, social science methods, and ...
PhD programme. The interdisciplinary PhD programme in Sustainability Science and Policy (SSP) is designed to educate researchers, university teachers, and world leaders in the social, economic and natural science disciplines that underpin sustainable development. The research produced by the programme's doctoral dissertations will focus on ...
The PhD in Sustainable Development at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) is a unique and innovative program that combines rigorous interdisciplinary training with practical application. This program provides a comprehensive education in both the social and natural sciences, preparing students to address ...
The PhD program in sustainability prepares students to become scientists and leaders in research who investigate the urgent sustainability challenges of this century. The flexible, transdisciplinary nature of the program allows students to focus on problems of interest to them, drawing upon relevant knowledge from sustainability science and a ...
The PhD in Sustainable Development is a full research programme focusing on key areas of sustainable development and themes outlined in the 17 sustainable development goals. The research topics will cover a wide range of complex issues and theories related to sustainable development, from the science of climate change and ecosystems to ...
This PhD program will take 3 years to complete when enrolled as a full-time student. Specialized Part-time Program. Currently offered in Sustainable Development and Interdisciplinary Studies. Offered exclusively to Central Agencies and National Research Institutes' employees. Apply Now (India) Apply Now (International)
Monash Sustainable Development Institute wants to support you in your graduate research. We have a number of scholarship opportunities for your own proposal ideas, as well as invitations to join PhD project ideas developed by supervisors. Applications also open for interest in future rounds.
Sustainable Development is critically important because many of the most important policy challenges facing the planet require a central focus on sustainability and development. The new interdisciplinary Ph.D. in Sustainable Development is designed to educate researchers, university teachers, and world leaders in the social and natural science ...
Integrated Research: The PhD program integrates environmental, societal, technological, economic, and health-related ideas and methods. Global Vision: Aims to develop a sustainable future in line with the UN's 2030 Agenda and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Sustainable development is a concept that has undergone several changes as the years have progressed, and new issues arose. Such evolution has been supported by the participation of various ...
Across the globe, comprehensive solutions for participatory and sustainable urban development are in high demand, with ongoing research and model testing. However, in Germany, sectoral boundaries have remained largely unchallenged. ... Our PhD Fellows are supporting our research mission as they complete their doctorate degrees. 04 Jul 2024.
Graduate Diploma in Sustainable Development. The Diploma in Sustainable Development considers the concept of sustainable development as an economic growth opportunity. The Diploma is designed for candidates who desire to make a contribution to the emerging field of sustainable development. The Diploma is directed at providing the student with ...
International co-operation on science, technology and innovation pushes the knowledge frontier and accelerates progress towards tackling shared global challenges like climate change and biodiversity loss. The OECD provides data and evidence-based analysis on supporting research and innovation and fostering policies that promote responsible innovation and technology governance for resilient and ...
Our BSc in Sustainable Development is an interdisciplinary degree designed to prepare you for an exciting and rewarding career. This course focuses on key 'real world' national and international agendas aimed at achieving sustainability. We prioritise developing employability skills, with a specific emphasis on the rapidly growing 'green jobs' market.