Information
- Author Services
Initiatives
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
- Active Journals
- Find a Journal
- Proceedings Series
- For Authors
- For Reviewers
- For Editors
- For Librarians
- For Publishers
- For Societies
- For Conference Organizers
- Open Access Policy
- Institutional Open Access Program
- Special Issues Guidelines
- Editorial Process
- Research and Publication Ethics
- Article Processing Charges
- Testimonials
- Preprints.org
- SciProfiles
- Encyclopedia
Article Menu
- Subscribe SciFeed
- Recommended Articles
- PubMed/Medline
- Google Scholar
- on Google Scholar
- Table of Contents
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
JSmol Viewer
Taking a break: the effects of partaking in a two-week social media digital detox on problematic smartphone and social media use, and other health-related outcomes among young adults.
1. Introduction
1.1. positive and negative consequences of smartphone use, 1.2. digital detoxes, 1.3. social-media-specific detoxes, 1.4. social media digital detoxes and health-related outcomes, 1.5. the present study.
- Does a social media digital detox impact smartphone or social media addiction?
- Does a social media digital detox impact physical, mental, or social health?
- What are participants’ experiences and perceptions of their social media digital detox?
2.1. Philosophical Approach
2.2. design, 2.3. intervention, 2.4. participants, 2.5. measures, 2.5.1. survey, 2.5.2. total screen time and social application screen time, 2.5.3. exit interview, 2.6. data analysis, 2.6.1. quantitative analysis, 2.6.2. qualitative analysis, 2.6.3. integration of datasets, 3.1. quantitative results, 3.1.1. smartphone and social media addiction, 3.1.2. health-related outcomes, 3.2. qualitative results, 3.3. integration of datasets, 4. discussion, 4.1. smartphone and social media addiction, 4.2. health-related outcomes, 4.3. experiences and perceptions of participants, 5. limitations, 6. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
- Howarth, J. Time Spent Using Smartphones (2023 Statistics). Available online: https://explodingtopics.com/blog/smartphone-usage-stats (accessed on 14 November 2023).
- Laricchia, F. Time Spent with Nonvoice Activities on Mobile Phones Every Day in the United States from 2019 to 2024 (in Minutes). Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1045353/mobile-device-daily-usage-time-in-the-us/ (accessed on 14 November 2023).
- Gowthami, S.; Kumar, S.V.K. Impact of smartphone: A pilot study on positive and negative effects. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2016 , 2 , 473–478. [ Google Scholar ]
- Carr, C.T.; Hayes, R.A. Social media: Defining, developing, and divining. Atl. J. Commun. 2015 , 23 , 46–65. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Joo, J.; Sang, Y. Exploring Koreans’ smartphone usage: An integrated model of the technology acceptance model and uses and gratifications theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2013 , 29 , 2512–2518. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Obar, J.A.; Wildman, S. Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue. Telecommun. Policy 2015 , 39 , 745–750. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Whiting, A.; Williams, D. Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qual. Mark. Res. 2013 , 16 , 362–369. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Beranuy, M.; Oberst, U.; Carbonell, X.; Chamarro, A. Problematic internet and mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students: The role of emotional intelligence. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2009 , 25 , 1182–1187. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Lepp, A.; Barkley, J.E.; Karpinski, A.C. The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and Satisfaction with Life in college students. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014 , 31 , 343–350. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Bianchi, A.; Phillips, J.G. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2005 , 8 , 39–51. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Ezoe, S.; Toda, M.; Yoshimura, K.; Naritomi, A.; Den, R.; Morimoto, K. Relationships of personality and lifestyle with mobile phone dependence among female nursing students. Soc. Behav. Pers. 2009 , 37 , 231–238. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Toda, M.; Monden, K.; Kubo, K.; Morimoto, K. Mobile phone dependence and health-related lifestyle of university students. Soc. Behav. Pers. 2006 , 34 , 1277–1284. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Lepp, A.; Barkley, J.E.; Sanders, G.J.; Rebold, M.; Gates, P. The relationship between cell phone use, physical and sedentary activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness in a sample of U.S. college students. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2013 , 10 , 79. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Sanchez-Martinez, M.; Otero, A. Factors associated with cell phone use in adolescents in the community of Madrid (Spain). Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2009 , 12 , 131–137. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Chotpitayasunondh, V.; Douglas, K.M. The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2018 , 48 , 304–316. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- King, A.L.; Valenca, A.M.; Silva, A.C.; Sancassiani, F.; Machado, S.; Nardi, A.E. “Nomophobia”: Impact of cell phone use interfering with symptoms and emotions of individuals with panic disorder compared with a control group. Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 2014 , 10 , 28–35. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Przybylski, A.K.; Murayama, K.; DeHaan, C.R.; Gladwell, V. Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2013 , 29 , 1841–1848. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Panova, T.; Carbonell, X. Is smartphone addiction really an addiction? J. Behav. Addict. 2018 , 7 , 252–259. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Smith, S. Why More Young People Are Ditching Their Smartphones. Available online: https://www.huckmag.com/perspectives/reportage-2/why-more-young-people-are-ditching-their-smartphones/ (accessed on 14 November 2023).
- Jorge, A. Social media, interrupted: Users recounting temporary disconnection on Instagram. Soc. Media Soc. 2019 , 5 , 205630511988169. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Radtke, T.; Apel, T.; Schenkel, K.; Keller, J.; von Lindern, E. Digital detox: An effective solution in the smartphone era? A systematic literature review. Mob. Media Commun. 2021 , 10 , 190–215. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Oxford Dictionnaries. Definition of digital detox in English. 2019.
- Ceci, L. Canada: Leading Mobile Activities 2022. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/442959/most-popular-smartphone-activities/ (accessed on 14 November 2023).
- Kaplan, A.M.; Haenlein, M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horiz. 2010 , 53 , 59–68. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Dixon, S. Global Daily Social Media Usage 2022. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/433871/daily-social-media-usage-worldwide/ (accessed on 14 November 2023).
- Dunican, I.C.; Martin, D.T.; Halson, S.L.; Reale, R.J.; Dawson, B.T.; Caldwell, J.A.; Jones, M.J.; Eastwood, P.R. The effects of the removal of electronic devices for 48 h on sleep in elite judo athletes. J. Strength. Cond. Res. 2017 , 31 , 2832–2839. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Liao, W. Put Your Smartphone Down: Preliminary Evidence that Reducing Smartphone Use Improves Psychological Well-Being in People with Poor Mental Health. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
- Hanley, S.M.; Watt, S.E.; Coventry, W. Taking a break: The effect of taking a vacation from Facebook and Instagram on subjective well-being. PLoS ONE 2019 , 14 , e0217743. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Fioravanti, G.; Prostamo, A.; Casale, S. Taking a short break from instagram: The effects on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2020 , 23 , 107–112. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Hall, J.A.; Xing, C.; Ross, E.M.; Johnson, R.M. Experimentally manipulating social media abstinence: Results of a four-week diary study. Media Psychol. 2019 , 24 , 259–275. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Hinsch, C.; Sheldon, K.M. The impact of frequent social Internet consumption: Increased procrastination and lower life satisfaction. J. Consum. Behav. 2013 , 12 , 496–505. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Tromholt, M. The Facebook experiment: Quitting Facebook leads to higher levels of well-being. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2016 , 19 , 661–666. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Vanman, E.J.; Baker, R.; Tobin, S.J. The burden of online friends: The effects of giving up Facebook on stress and well-being. J. Soc. Psychol. 2018 , 158 , 496–507. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Vally, Z.; D’Souza, C.G. Abstinence from social media use, subjective well-being, stress, and loneliness. Perspect. Psychiatr. Care 2019 , 55 , 752–759. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Eide, T.A.; Aarestad, S.H.; Andreassen, C.S.; Bilder, R.M.; Pallesen, S. Smartphone restriction and its effect on subjective withdrawal related scores. Front. Psychol. 2018 , 9 , 1444. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Stieger, S.; Lewetz, D. A week without using social media: Results from an ecological momentary intervention study using smartphones. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2018 , 21 , 618–624. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Hunt, M.G.; Marx, R.; Lipson, C.; Young, J. No more FOMO: Limiting social media decreases loneliness and depression. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 2018 , 37 , 751–768. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Skierkowski, D.; Wood, R.M. To text or not to text? The importance of text messaging among college-aged youth. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012 , 28 , 744–756. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Wilcockson, T.D.W.; Osborne, A.M.; Ellis, D.A. Digital detox: The effect of smartphone abstinence on mood, anxiety, and craving. Addict. Behav. 2019 , 99 , 106013. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Anrijs, S.; Bombeke, K.; Durnez, W.; Van Damme, K.; Vanhaelewyn, B.; Conradie, P.; Smets, E.; Cornelis, J.; De Raedt, W.; Ponnet, K.; et al. MobileDNA: Relating physiological stress measurements to smartphone usage to assess the effect of a digital detox. In HCI International 2018—Posters’ Extended Abstracts: 20th International Conference, HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 15–20 July 2018, Proceedings, Part II ; Stephanidis, C., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 356–363. [ Google Scholar ]
- Turel, O.; Cavagnaro, D.R.; Meshi, D. Short abstinence from online social networking sites reduces perceived stress, especially in excessive users. Psychiatry Res. 2018 , 270 , 947–953. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Ko, M.; Yang, S.; Lee, J.; Heizmann, C.; Jeong, J.; Lee, U.; Shin, D.; Yatani, K.; Song, J.; Chung, K.-M. NUGU: A group-based intervention app for improving self-regulation of limiting smartphone use. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 14–18 March 2015; pp. 1235–1245. [ Google Scholar ]
- Buctot, D.B.; Kim, N.; Park, K.E. Development and evaluation of smartphone detox program for university students. Int. J. Contents 2018 , 14 , 1–9. [ Google Scholar ]
- Keller, J.; Roitzheim, C.; Radtke, T.; Schenkel, K.; Schwarzer, R. A mobile intervention for self-efficacious and goal-directed smartphone use in the general population: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021 , 9 , e26397. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Petrosyan, A. Share of Users in the United States Intentionally Taking a Break from Their Digital Devices as of September 2022, by Frequency. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1342542/us-users-frequency-digital-detox/ (accessed on 14 November 2023).
- Bhaskar, R. A Realist Theory of Science ; Leeds Books: Leeds, UK, 1975. [ Google Scholar ]
- Bhaskar, R. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences ; Harvester Press: Brighton, UK, 1978. [ Google Scholar ]
- Bhaskar, R. Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy ; Verso: London, UK, 1989. [ Google Scholar ]
- Creswell, J.W. A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research ; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2015. [ Google Scholar ]
- Creswell, J.W.; Plano Clark, V.L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 3rd ed.; Sage Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
- Cowie, L.; Braun, V. Between social and biomedical explanation: Queer and gender diverse young people’s explanations of psychological distress. Psychol. Sex. 2022 , 13 , 1179–1190. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Kwon, M.; Kim, D.J.; Cho, H.; Yang, S. The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS ONE 2013 , 8 , e83558. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Kwon, M.; Lee, J.Y.; Won, W.Y.; Park, J.W.; Min, J.A.; Hahn, C.; Gu, X.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, D.J. Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PLoS ONE 2013 , 8 , e56936. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Schou Andreassen, C.; Billieux, J.; Griffiths, M.D.; Kuss, D.J.; Demetrovics, Z.; Mazzoni, E.; Pallesen, S. The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: A large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2016 , 30 , 252–262. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Banyai, F.; Zsila, A.; Kiraly, O.; Maraz, A.; Elekes, Z.; Griffiths, M.D.; Andreassen, C.S.; Demetrovics, Z. Problematic social media use: Results from a large-scale nationally representative adolescent sample. PLoS ONE 2017 , 12 , e0169839. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Armstrong, T.; Bull, F. Development of the World Health Organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). J. Public Health 2006 , 14 , 66–70. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Herrmann, S.D.; Heumann, K.J.; Der Ananian, C.A.; Ainsworth, B.E. Validity and reliability of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). Meas. Phys. Educ. Exerc. Sci. 2013 , 17 , 221–235. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Keating, X.D.; Zhou, K.; Liu, X.; Hodges, M.; Liu, J.; Guan, J.; Phelps, A.; Castro-Pinero, J. Reliability and concurrent validity of Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019 , 16 , 4128. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Framson, C.; Kristal, A.R.; Schenk, J.M.; Littman, A.J.; Zeliadt, S.; Benitez, D. Development and validation of the mindful eating questionnaire. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009 , 109 , 1439–1444. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS)—Rapid Response—Healthy Living. Available online: https://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p3Instr.pl?Function=assembleInstr&Item_Id=1262718&TET=1 (accessed on 14 November 2023).
- Diener, E.; Emmons, R.A.; Larsen, R.J.; Griffin, S. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J. Pers. Assess. 1985 , 49 , 71–75. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Pavot, W.; Diener, E. The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. J. Posit. Psychol. 2008 , 3 , 137–152. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Cohen, S.; Kamarck, T.; Mermelstein, R. A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1983 , 24 , 385–396. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Lee, E.H. Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian Nurs. Res. (Korean Soc. Nurs. Sci.) 2012 , 6 , 121–127. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Adams, T.; Bezner, J.; Steinhardt, M. The conceptualization and measurement of perceived wellness: Integrating balance across and within dimensions. Am. J. Health Promot. 1997 , 11 , 208–218. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Harari, M.J.; Waehler, C.A.; Rogers, J.R. An empirical investigation of a theoretically based measure of perceived wellness. J. Couns. Psychol. 2005 , 52 , 93–103. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Cook-Cottone, C.P.; Guyker, W.M. The development and validation of the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS): An assessment of practices that support positive embodiment. Mindfulness 2017 , 9 , 161–175. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Kallio, H.; Pietila, A.M.; Johnson, M.; Kangasniemi, M. Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J. Adv. Nurs. 2016 , 72 , 2954–2965. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Kvale, S.; Brinkmann, S. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing , 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
- Jarosz, A.F.; Wiley, J. What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. J. Probl. Solving 2014 , 7 , 2. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Rothman, K.J. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1990 , 1 , 43–46. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Armstrong, R.A. When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2014 , 34 , 502–508. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Streiner, D.L.; Norman, G.R. Correction for multiple testing: Is there a resolution? Chest 2011 , 140 , 16–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Proudfoot, K. Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. J. Mix. Methods Res. 2022 , 17 , 308–326. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006 , 3 , 77–101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Krefting, L. Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 1991 , 45 , 214–222. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Finlay, L.; Gough, B. Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and the Social Sciences ; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
- Lee, M.D.; Wagenmakers, E.-J. Bayesian Cognitive Modeling: A Practical Course ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014. [ Google Scholar ]
- Brown, L.; Kuss, D.J. Fear of missing out, mental wellbeing, and social connectedness: A seven-day social media abstinence trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 4566. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
- Grimaldi-Puyana, M.; Fernandez-Batanero, J.M.; Fennell, C.; Sanudo, B. Associations of objectively-assessed smartphone use with physical activity, sedentary behavior, mood, and sleep quality in young adults: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 , 17 , 3499. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Wacks, Y.; Weinstein, A.M. Excessive smartphone use is associated with health problems in adolescents and young adults. Front. Psychiatry 2021 , 12 , 669042. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
- Yang, J.; Fu, X.; Liao, X.; Li, Y. Association of problematic smartphone use with poor sleep quality, depression, and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2020 , 284 , 112686. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
Click here to enlarge figure
| Measure | M | SD | Range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smartphone use (minutes) | ||||
| Pre-intervention | 312.35 | 120.85 | 142 to 664 | |
| Intervention | 237.00 | 121.25 | 100 to 665 | |
| Post-Intervention | 290.87 | 102.94 | 148 to 548 | |
| Social media use (minutes) | ||||
| Pre-intervention | 129.81 | 58.68 | 64 to 306 | |
| Intervention | 24.58 | 5.21 | 7 to 30 | |
| Post-Intervention | 117.26 | 53.67 | 29 to 231 | |
| Outcome | Pre-Intervention | Intervention | Post-Intervention | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SD | M | SD | M | SD | ||
| Addiction | Smartphone addiction (10 to 60) | 29.39 | 6.01 | 22.10 | 5.46 | 25.71 | 6.47 |
| Social media addiction (6 to 30) | 14.94 | 3.75 | 11.61 | 3.33 | 13.61 | 4.13 | |
| Physical | Physical activity (minutes per day) | 49.70 | 45.42 | 49.15 | 34.92 | 50.58 | 59.58 |
| Sedentary behaviour (minutes per day) | 445.00 | 142.88 | 435.97 | 135.66 | 447.10 | 116.73 | |
| Mindful eating (1–5) | 2.32 | 0.35 | 2.29 | 0.31 | 2.28 | 0.38 | |
| Sleep duration (0 to 24 h) | 7.73 | 1.11 | 8.27 | 1.24 | 8.10 | 1.27 | |
| Sleep quality (1 to 4) | 2.58 | 0.72 | 3.03 | 0.80 | 2.71 | 0.74 | |
| Mental | Life Satisfaction (5 to 35) | 23.94 | 6.44 | 24.90 | 6.12 | 25.71 | 5.78 |
| Stress (0 to 40) | 18.39 | 4.61 | 15.74 | 4.58 | 16.84 | 4.88 | |
| Perceived wellness (33 to 198) | 140.39 | 18.16 | 145.65 | 18.05 | 145.29 | 19.21 | |
| Social | Supportive relationships (1 to 5) | 4.14 | 0.65 | 4.32 | 0.56 | 4.17 | 0.55 |
| Outcome | F (2,62) | Exact p | ω | ω Interpretation | BF | BF Interpretation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addiction | Smartphone addiction | 18.442 *** | <0.001 | 0.189 | large | 39,275.319 | Extreme evidence for H |
| Social media addiction | 8.460 *** | <0.001 | 0.105 | medium | 71.561 | Extreme evidence for H | |
| Physical | Physical activity | 0.020 | 0.980 | 0.000 | - | 0.097 | Strong evidence for H |
| Sedentary behaviour | 0.140 | 0.870 | 0.000 | - | 0.110 | Moderate evidence for H | |
| Mindful eating | 0.391 | 0.678 | 0.000 | - | 0.131 | Moderate evidence for H | |
| Sleep duration | 4.067 * | 0.022 | 0.026 | small | 2.180 | Anecdotal evidence for H | |
| Sleep quality | 4.579 * | 0.014 | 0.047 | small | 3.500 | Moderate evidence for H | |
| Mental | Satisfaction with life | 4.407 * | 0.016 | 0.011 | small | 2.755 | Anecdotal evidence for H |
| Stress | 5.792 ** | 0.005 | 0.042 | small | 7.726 | Moderate evidence for H | |
| Perceived wellness | 6.934 ** | 0.005 | 0.014 | small | 17.134 | Strong evidence for H | |
| Social | Supportive relationships | 3.875 * | 0.026 | 0.013 | small | 1.879 | Anecdotal evidence for H |
| Theme and Definition | Categories and Definitions | Example Quotes |
|---|---|---|
| Theme 1—Feelings: emotions felt because of detox | Enjoyment: participants said they felt good during the detox and liked how it was making them feel | |
| Relief: participants communicated that they felt less obliged to maintain their social media presence, resulting in positive mood and reduced stress | ||
| Disconnection: participants felt their disengagement from social media hindered their connection to people online and/or their ability to stay up to date with the happenings of the world | ? (18) | |
| Theme 2—Effort to detox: effort required to partake in detox | Easier than anticipated: participants expressed that the detox was easier than they initially thought it would be | |
| Being busy helps: participants suggested that the detox was easier when they were busy compared to when they had less to do | ||
| Theme 3—Adjustment period: period required to adjust to restrictions of detox | Change in routine: participants said the detox disrupted their daily routine (e.g., morning or nighttime routine), creating some discomfort, at least initially | |
| Getting over the hump: participants expressed that the first few days of the detox were the most challenging but that it became easier in subsequent days | ||
| Small pockets of time: participants struggled to fill small periods of time (e.g., 5 min) between back-to-back commitments | … so I that I think those were the most disruptive. (18) | |
| Theme 4—The Goldilocks effect: the parameters of the detox were optimal | N/A | |
| Theme 5—Screen to screen: replacing social media screen time with other types of screen time | Switching applications: participants expressed that they spent more time than they normally would on non-social media applications on their smartphones during the detox | . […] Putting my screen time and other areas that wasn’t social media like I’m like, this isn’t going to stop me from being on my phone, but it’s stopping me from being on certain things. (18) |
| Switching screen: participants said that they spent more time than they normally would on other devices (e.g., laptop, tablet) during the detox | ||
| Theme 6—Post-detox binge: excessive indulgence in social media after completing the intervention period | N/A | again. Let me just like scroll aimlessly and like have no self-control for a couple days, (18) |
| Theme 7—Progress not perfection: focus on small, achievable steps in the right direction, not perfection | Awareness: participants acknowledged that they were more aware of their social media habits on their smartphone after completing the detox | . (29) So yeah, a lot of opportunity for reflection, I guess. (31) … I think I need to go back to that. (13) |
| Modified limits: participants expressed a desire to continue limiting their social media usage but with modified limits | It’s kind of like a wake up. (15) | |
| Down time: participants expressed that the detox has encouraged them not to access social media on their smartphone while they are completing other tasks | . So, when I was at the gym, I was thinking I have 30 min a day. You’re not going on my phone for social media at the gym, so I really liked that, and I’ve started doing that even after the limits went off. (34) | |
| Theme 8—Words of wisdom: considerations for future detoxes | Realistic limit/reduction: participants suggested that slightly more time (than 30 min) on social media would be more realistic and to consider personalized reductions instead of a one-size-fits-all approach | |
| Notifications: participants suggested that detox compliance might increase if participants turn off their social media notifications to avoid temptation | ||
| Identify the most problematic: participants suggested focusing the detox on certain apps, specifically those deemed most problematic by the user | ||
| Delete or deactivate: participants suggested deleting or deactivating social media applications during the detox to reduce temptation |
| Outcome | Quantitative Findings (Frequentist and Bayesian) | Qualitative Findings (Quotes from Participants about Health-Related Changes They Noticed as a Result of the Detox) |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour | Frequentist: Maintain H BF: Strong and moderate evidence for H | |
| Sleep Duration and Quality | Frequentist: Reject H but small effect size BF: Anecdotal and moderate evidence for H | |
| Mindful Eating | Frequentist: Maintain H BF: Moderate evidence for H | |
| Life Satisfaction | Frequentist: Reject H but small effect size BF: Anecdotal evidence for H | |
| Stress | Frequentist: Reject H but small effect size BF: Moderate evidence for H | |
| Perceived Wellness | Frequentist: Reject H but small effect size BF: Strong evidence for H | (12) |
| Relationships | Frequentist: Reject H but small effect size BF: Anecdotal evidence for H |
| The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Share and Cite
Coyne, P.; Woodruff, S.J. Taking a Break: The Effects of Partaking in a Two-Week Social Media Digital Detox on Problematic Smartphone and Social Media Use, and Other Health-Related Outcomes among Young Adults. Behav. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13121004
Coyne P, Woodruff SJ. Taking a Break: The Effects of Partaking in a Two-Week Social Media Digital Detox on Problematic Smartphone and Social Media Use, and Other Health-Related Outcomes among Young Adults. Behavioral Sciences . 2023; 13(12):1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13121004
Coyne, Paige, and Sarah J. Woodruff. 2023. "Taking a Break: The Effects of Partaking in a Two-Week Social Media Digital Detox on Problematic Smartphone and Social Media Use, and Other Health-Related Outcomes among Young Adults" Behavioral Sciences 13, no. 12: 1004. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13121004
Article Metrics
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
- Advanced Search
- Journal List
- J Med Internet Res
- PMC10457695
The Impact of Social Media Use Interventions on Mental Well-Being: Systematic Review
Ruth plackett.
1 Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Alexandra Blyth
Patricia schartau, associated data.
Search strategy used for MEDLINE.
Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies scoring criteria.
Quality scores according to the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool and overall effectiveness of social media use interventions on outcomes.
There is some evidence that more social media use is related to poorer mental well-being and that social media use can become problematic when it starts to interfere with a person’s daily life and mental well-being. To address this issue and improve users’ mental well-being, social media use interventions (eg, abstinence from social media) have been developed and evaluated. However, there is limited understanding of the effectiveness of these interventions in improving mental well-being.
This systematic review aimed to synthesize the literature on the effectiveness of social media use interventions in improving mental well-being in adults.
A systematic search (January 1, 2004, to July 31, 2022) was completed across 3 databases in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Experimental studies evaluating the impact of social media use interventions on mental well-being in adults were included. Outcomes related to mental well-being, such as depression, anxiety, stress, and loneliness, were included. A narrative synthesis without meta-analysis was completed to summarize the study characteristics and effectiveness by outcome and intervention type. The Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool was used to measure the quality of the studies.
Of the 2785 studies identified through the systematic search, 23 (0.83%) were included in the analysis. Many of the included studies (9/23, 39%) found improvements in mental well-being, some (7/23, 30%) found mixed effects, and others (7/23, 30%) found no effect on mental well-being. Therapy-based interventions that used techniques such as cognitive behavioral therapy were more effective than limiting use of social media or full abstinence from social media, with 83% (5/6) of these studies showing improvements in mental well-being compared with 20% (1/5) and 25% (3/12), respectively. Depression was the most frequently investigated and improved outcome with 70% (7/10) of the studies showing a significant improvement in depression after the intervention, whereas other outcomes showed more varied results. Quality was poor, with 96% (22/23) of the studies receiving a weak global score, mostly for issues related to selection bias because most of the studies (16/23, 70%) used a convenience sampling of university students.
Conclusions
This review provides some evidence that social media use interventions are effective in improving mental well-being, especially for depression and when using therapy-based interventions. Further experimental and longitudinal research is needed with representative samples to investigate who may benefit most from social media use interventions. This will help to develop guidance and recommendations for policy makers and clinicians on how best to manage problematic social media use.
Introduction
Over the past decade, the rates of poor mental well-being have steadily increased in the United Kingdom, with steep increases seen for young adults [ 1 , 2 ]. As of 2022, in the United Kingdom, 1 in 4 individuals aged 17 to 19 years had reported a probable mental disorder, up from 1 in 10 in 2017 [ 3 ]. At the same time, social media use is on the rise, and it is estimated that 4.59 billion people globally used at least 1 form of social media in 2022 [ 4 - 6 ]. Social media generally refers to “internet-based tools that allow individuals and communities to gather and communicate; to share information, ideas, personal messages, images, and other content; and, in some cases, to collaborate with other users in real time” [ 7 ]. Social media has significantly changed how people communicate, form and maintain relationships, and perceive each other, and there is concern about how this affects mental health [ 8 ].
Evidence on the impact of social media on mental health is conflicting [ 9 ]. Some studies report benefits of social media use for mental health, including increased social support, strengthened bonds, and help seeking [ 10 , 11 ]. Other evidence has shown that high social media use has been linked with depression, anxiety, psychological problems, and distress, particularly for young people [ 12 , 13 ]. When social media use begins to interfere with everyday life, it can be considered problematic, with the most severe form arguably termed social media addiction [ 4 , 14 ]. Problematic social media use is described as a preoccupation with social media, resulting in distraction from primary tasks and the neglect of responsibilities in other aspects of life [ 15 , 16 ]. Reports suggest that 17.4% of social media users are affected by some form of problematic social media use, and it is most prevalent in adolescents and young adults [ 4 , 17 ]. Previous research has identified significant positive associations between problematic social media use and depression and anxiety [ 18 ]. However, the quality of studies linking social media use and mental well-being is limited by a reliance on unvalidated self-reported measures to assess social media use and by cross-sectional study designs in which causality cannot be inferred [ 9 ]. In addition, much of the research on the relationship between social media use and mental health has focused on adolescents, but there is growing evidence that social media use plays a role in adult mental health, particularly for young adults [ 18 ].
Social Media Use Interventions
Studies have explored the effectiveness of different types of social media use interventions to improve mental well-being, ranging from therapy-based approaches and taking complete breaks from social media to limiting social media use to a few hours a day [ 19 - 21 ]. Therapy-based approaches tend to use therapeutic techniques such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or group psychological counseling to prompt reflection on behaviors, thoughts, and feelings around social media and consideration of time management; for example, weekly group psychological counseling and CBT diaries have been used to help students manage their social media use by focusing on how they spend their time and how they can improve their relationships and communication skills offline [ 22 ]. These types of interventions are thought to bring about behavior change through facilitating self-control and reflection [ 23 ]. These therapeutic interventions can help individuals to regulate their social media use and reprioritize their social activity, which may improve well-being [ 24 ].
A recent systematic review that explored social media use interventions where participants had time-outs from smartphone use, or what is termed a digital detox , found mixed impacts of these interventions on mental well-being [ 25 ]. However, the review did not distinguish between abstinence from smartphone use more generally and specific abstinence from social media and did not explore effectiveness by the different types of social media interventions, such as limited use or full abstinence. Therefore, it is unclear what the effects of different types of interventions are on social media use and on mental well-being. It is also unclear from the literature what specific effects social media use interventions have on adults because much of the previous research in this area has focused on adolescents. Young adults are of particular interest because they have been identified as being vulnerable to problematic social media use in previous research [ 17 , 26 ]. A review specifically synthesizing the evidence on the effectiveness of social media use interventions on adults’ mental well-being will help to identify how best to support those with problematic social media use and poor mental well-being. Synthesizing these experimental studies will also help to understand the relationship between social media use and mental well-being. This systematic review aimed to (1) identify and describe evaluated social media use interventions, (2) report the effectiveness of these interventions on mental well-being outcomes, and (3) evaluate the quality of current research.
This review was completed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines [ 27 ], and the protocol is available via the Open Science Framework [ 28 ].
Search Strategy
The search was limited to studies published between January 1, 2004 (because the year 2004 marked the advent of widespread use of social media platforms), and July 31, 2022 [ 5 ]. The search strategy was developed by the research team with input from an experienced librarian. Three electronic databases were searched independently: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Papers at full-text screening were used for backward citation chaining, and the reference lists of similar previous reviews were checked for additional references. The search strategy for MEDLINE can be found in Multimedia Appendix 1 .
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The inclusion and exclusion criteria listed in Table 1 were applied.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Concepts | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
| Population | ||
| Intervention | ) | |
| Comparator | ||
| Outcome | ]. FOMO was also included because it has been found to be associated with problematic social media use and poorer mental well-being [ - ] | |
| Study types | ||
| Publication types |
a CBT: cognitive behavioral therapy.
b N/A: not applicable.
c FOMO: fear of missing out.
We used the referencing manager software Rayyan to screen articles. Titles and abstracts were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 10.02% (279/2785) of the abstracts were screened by a second reviewer, with any conflicts resolved in discussion. The Cohen κ score was 0.56, with moderate agreement [ 33 ]. The full texts of the remaining articles were then screened, with 10% (4/42) screened by a second reviewer.
Data Extraction
Information on the authors, year, country of origin, aims, methods, types of interventions, main findings, and limitations of each study was extracted using a data extraction table in Excel (Microsoft Corp). The extraction of 26% (11/42) of the full-text articles was checked by a second reviewer to ensure accuracy and consistency.
Quality Assessment
The Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool was used to assess quality because this is a validated tool designed to assess quality in public health topics [ 34 ]. All studies were given a global score (strong, moderate, or weak) based on 6 key topics: selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection method, and withdrawals or dropouts. Refer to Multimedia Appendix 2 for a breakdown of the scoring criteria for each key area and overall.
A narrative synthesis without meta-analysis was completed owing to the heterogeneity of the outcomes and interventions. We summarized the studies, intervention characteristics, and effectiveness by outcome and type of intervention. We calculated the effect size (Cohen d ) for all studies, where possible, to compare effectiveness across outcomes and intervention types.
Search Results
The details of the search process and included studies are summarized in Figure 1 .
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart of the systematic search results.
The search strategy yielded 2785 research papers, of which, after removing duplicates, 1895 (68.05%) were selected for title and abstract screening. Of these 1895 papers, we excluded 1862 (98.26%) based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and added 9 texts based on the reference list of a previous review. Of these 42 papers eligible for full-text screening, 23 (55%) were included for final analysis.
Study Characteristics
Study characteristics are summarized in Table 2 . All studies were published between 2016 and 2022, with the most common locations being the United States (6/23, 26%), the United Kingdom (5/23, 22%), and China (3/23, 13%). Most of the interventions targeted social media use on general social media sites (10/23, 44%) and Facebook (10/23, 44%), followed by those targeting Instagram (6/23, 26%), Twitter (3/23, 13%), Snapchat (3/23, 13%), TikTok (2/23, 9%), Pinterest (1/23, 4%), and Tumblr (1/23, 4%). Almost a third (7/23, 30%) of the studies targeted the use of multiple specific social media platforms. Randomized controlled trials were the most frequent study design (21/23, 91%). Only 2 (9%) of the 23 studies were pre- and postintervention studies, measuring mental well-being before and after an intervention with no control group [ 35 , 36 ]. There were 3 main types of interventions. Most of the studies (12/23, 52%) evaluated the impact of full abstinence from social media, with the abstinence period ranging from 1 day to 4 weeks. This was followed by therapy-based interventions such as counseling or CBT approaches (6/23, 26%) [ 22 ]. Many of the therapy-based types of interventions were self-guided (4/6, 67%) [ 37 - 40 ], with 2 (50%) of these 4 interventions using internet-based app–based platforms [ 38 , 39 ] and 2 (50%) of these 4 interventions using CBT-based diaries to reflect on social media use and time management [ 37 , 40 ]. Of the 6 therapy-based interventions, 1 (17%) used a mixture of in-person peer-based group psychological counseling and an internet-based social media group to share suggestions for alternative activities to social media use [ 22 ], 1 (17%) used entirely in-person sessions with training in basic mindfulness skills and values clarification based on acceptance and commitment therapy concepts [ 35 ], and 1 (17%) also encouraged limitation of social media use to only a few hours a day [ 37 ]. Roughly a quarter (5/23, 22%) of all included studies explored the effect of limiting social media use per day, with intervals ranging from 10- to 60-minute restrictions. More than a third (9/23, 39%) of the included interventions lasted 1 week, with the shortest lasting 1 day and the longest lasting 5 weeks [ 35 ].
Characteristics of studies and social media use interventions sorted by intervention type.
| Study, year; country | Study design | Intervention type | Social media intervention target | Intervention duration | Comparator | Sample size, n | Age (years), range (mean, SD) | |
| | Brown and Kuss [ ], 2020; United Kingdom | Pre-post study | Full abstinence | General | 1 week | None | 61 | 20-49 (24.40, 4.95) |
| | Fioravanti et al [ ], 2020; Italy | RCT | Full abstinence | 1 week | Control | 80; IG : 40, CG : 40 | ≥18 (25.05, 4.17) | |
| | Hall et al [ ], 2019; United States | RCT | Full abstinence | Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter | 4 groups: 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks | Control | 130; IG 1 week: 28, IG 2 weeks: 17, IG 3 weeks: 24, and IG 4 weeks: 26; CG: 35 | 18-68 (26.80, 11.40) |
| | Hanley et al [ ], 2019; Australia | RCT | Full abstinence | Facebook and Instagram | 1 week | Control | 78; IG: 40, CG: 38 | 18-48 (30.85, 7.12) |
| | Lambert et al [ ], 2022; United Kingdom | RCT | Full abstinence | Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and Instagram | 1 week | Control | 154; IG: 81, CG: 73 | ≥18 (28.90, 12.75) |
| | Mitev et al [ ], 2021; United Kingdom and Bulgaria | RCT (crossover trial ) | Full abstinence | General | 3 days | Control | 232; IG: 116, CG: 116 | 18-71 (24.70, N/R ) |
| | Mosquera et al [ ], 2020; United States | RCT | Full abstinence | 1 week | Control | 167; IG: 77, CG: 90 | N/R; undergraduates | |
| | Przybylski et al [ ], 2021; United Kingdom, United States, and Hong Kong | RCT (crossover trial) | Full abstinence | General | 1 day | Control | 297; IG: 297, CG: 297 | 18-56 (20.50, 2.86) |
| | Tromholt [ ], 2016; Denmark | RCT | Full abstinence | 1 week | Control | 888; IG: 516, CG: 372 | N/R (34.00, 8.74) | |
| | Turel et al [ ], 2018; United States | 2×2 RCT | Full abstinence | 1 week | Control | 555; IG: 413, CG: 142 | 19-54 (24.01, 4.14) | |
| | Vally and D’Souza [ ], 2019; United Arab Emirates | RCT | Full abstinence | General | 1 week | Control | 78; IG: 39, CG: 39 | 18-27 (22.13, N/R) |
| | Vanman et al [ ], 2018; Australia | RCT | Full abstinence | 5 days | Control | 138; IG: 60, CG: 78 | 18-40 (22.43, N/R) | |
| | Chen et al [ ], 2022; China | RCT | Group psychological counseling | General | 1 month | Control | 60; IG: 30, CG: 30 | N/R; undergraduates |
| | Hou et al [ ], 2019; China | 2×2 RCT | Cognitive reconstruction, reminder cards, and diaries | General | 2 weeks | Control | 38; IG: 21, CG: 17 | N/R (19.71, 1.43) |
| | O’Connell [ ], 2020; United Arab Emirates | Pre-post study | 1 hour per week mindfulness workshop | General | 5 weeks | None | 24; N/R | 18-25 (N/R) |
| | Esmaeili Rad and Ahmadi [ ], 2018; Iran | RCT | Reality therapy mobile app+reflective questionnaires | General | 2 weeks | Control (only questionnaires) | 200; IG: 100, CG: 100 | 18-28 (N/R) |
| | Throuvala et al [ ], 2020; United Kingdom | RCT | CBT -based app | General | 10 days | Control | 143; IG: 72, CG: 71 | 18-32 (20.72, 3.12) |
| | Zhou et al [ ], 2021; China | RCT | CBT-based part abstinence (4 of 7 weekdays)+daily reflective diaries | General | 2 weeks | Control (social media as usual+daily diaries) | 65; IG: 33, CG: 32 | N/R (28.80, 4.90) |
| | Brailovskaia et al [ ], 2020; Germany | RCT | Limited use (20 min/d) | 2 weeks | Control | 286; IG: 140; CG: 146 | 18-59 (25.39, 5.89) | |
| | Graham et al [ ], 2021; New Zealand | RCT | Limited use (10 min/d) | Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat | 1 week | Control | 184; IG: 92, CG: 92 | 18-61 (22.46, 6.83) |
| | Hunt et al [ ], 2018; United States | RCT | Limited use (10 min/d) | Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat | 3 weeks | Control | 143; N/R | N/R; undergraduates |
| | Hunt et al [ ], 2021; United States | RCT | Limited use (30 min/d) | Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Snapchat | 3 weeks | (1) Control and (2) limited active group (30 min/d+1 action every 3 min, eg, posting and replying) | 88; N/R | N/R; undergraduates |
| | Thai et al [ ], 2021; Canada | RCT | Limited use (60 min/d) | Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok, Pinterest, and Tumblr | 3 weeks | Control | 38; IG: 16, CG: 22 | 17-25 (N/R, 0.94) |
a Targeting any social media platform.
b RCT: randomized controlled trial.
c Usual social media use.
d IG: intervention group.
e CG: control group.
f All participants receive all interventions, but the order in which they receive them (the sequence) is randomized.
g N/R: not reported.
h CBT: cognitive behavioral therapy.
Sample Characteristics
Sample sizes ranged from 24 to 888 individuals, with 44% (10/23) of the studies including a sample size of <100 people. Where provided, sample ages ranged from 17 to 71 years, and 61% (14/23) of the studies reported mean ages between 20 and 30 years. Of the 23 studies, 4 (17%) did not provide ages and categorized participants as undergraduates [ 22 , 46 , 54 , 55 ]. A little more than half (12/23, 52%) of the studies recruited participants via university sampling, 30% (7/23) used web advertisements, and 17% (4/23) combined these methods [ 39 , 42 , 51 , 53 ].
Nearly all studies (22/23, 96%) were given a weak global score, and no studies achieved a strong global score. Only the study by Throuvala et al [ 39 ] achieved a moderate score and this study showed a beneficial effect of the intervention on outcomes. Most of the studies were subject to selection bias, with 70% (16/23) being of moderate quality and 30% (7/23) being of weak quality on this criterion, because most of the studies (16/23, 70%) used convenience sampling from university populations. Most of the studies (21/23, 91%) did not report blinding of the researcher or participants. A little more than a third (8/23, 35%) of the studies were weak in study design because although they randomized participants, they did not report how they did this. The studies had relatively low withdrawals and dropouts, with a little more than half (12/23, 52%) reporting that ≥80% of the participants completed the studies. Less than half (9/23, 39%) of the studies fully accounted for confounding variables. A little more than half (12/23, 52%) demonstrated that the data collection tools used were reliable and valid. Scores for all sections are provided in Multimedia Appendix 3 alongside the effectiveness of the interventions.
Mental Well-Being Outcomes and Effectiveness
The details of study outcomes in relation to mental well-being are provided in Table 3 . The main outcomes related to mental well-being reported in the studies were depression, life satisfaction, anxiety, fear of missing out (FOMO), mental well-being, positive affect, negative affect, loneliness, stress, self-esteem, and mindfulness. Depression was the most common outcome that was assessed (10/23, 44%), followed by life satisfaction (9/23, 39%), mental well-being (8/23, 35%), and anxiety (6/23, 26%). The least common outcomes that were assessed were self-esteem (3/23, 13%) and mindfulness (2/23, 9%). Most of the studies (18/23, 78%) investigated >1 mental well-being outcome. More than a third (9/23, 39%) of the studies demonstrated improvements in well-being–related outcomes. Almost one-third (7/23, 30%) of the studies found mixed effects across different well-being–related outcomes [ 35 , 41 , 46 , 49 - 51 , 54 ], and almost a third (7/23, 30%) found no effect [ 42 , 43 , 45 , 47 , 52 , 53 , 56 ].
Effectiveness of social media use interventions on mental well-being sorted by intervention type.
| Study, year | Outcomes | Measures | Comparison measurement | Postintervention-reported values (unless labeled) | Effect size (Cohen ) and interpretation | Main finding | Direction of effect | |
| | Brown and Kuss [ ], 2020 | Mean difference between before and after the intervention (SD) | ) ) | Significant improvements after the intervention | ↑ | |||
| | Fioravanti et al [ ], 2020 | Calculated mean difference between IG and CG for women and men | ) ) | Significantly improved life satisfaction and positive affect for women but not for men in the IG compared with those in the CG | ↕ | |||
| | Hall et al [ ], 2019 | ] | Mean (SD) | No significant difference for the IG compared with the CG across all measures | ↔ | |||
| | Hanley et al [ ], 2019 | Standardized coefficients from multiple regression | No significant difference for the IG compared with the CG across all measures | ↔ | ||||
| | Lambert et al [ ], 2022 | Mean (SD) | Significant improvements for the IG compared with the CG across all measures | ↑ | ||||
| | Mitev et al [ ], 2021 | Mental well-being | Daily satisfaction question, self-esteem scale, and positive and negative affect scales were combined to create an overall composite score of participants’ well-being | value and partial eta–squared value | =0.11; P=.89; η =.001 | 0.06 (X) | No significant difference for the IG compared with the CG | ↔ |
| | Mosquera et al [ ], 2020 | Mean difference between before and after the intervention (SD) | — | Significant improvements for the IG compared with the CG for depression but not for life satisfaction | ↕ | |||
| | Przybylski et al [ ], 2021 | Mean (SD) | No significant difference for the IG compared with the CG | ↔ | ||||
| | Tromholt [ ], 2016 | and 4 items from PANAS combined | Mean (SD) | Significant improvements for the IG compared with the CG across all measures | ↑ | |||
| | Turel et al [ ], 2018 | Marginal means (95% CI) | Significantly reduced absolute stress in the IG but not relative stress compared with the CG | ↕ | ||||
| | Vally and D’Souza [ ], 2019 | Mean (SD) | Significantly reduced life satisfaction and increased negative feelings and loneliness for the IG compared with the CG but no difference in positive affect or stress | ↕ | ||||
| | Vanman et al [ ], 2018 | Mean difference between before and after the intervention (SD) | 0.54 (M) | The IG had significantly reduced life satisfaction compared with the CG but no other outcomes were significantly different | ↕ | |||
| | Chen et al [ ], 2022 | Mean (SD) | Significant improvements for the IG compared with the CG across all measures | ↑ | ||||
| | Hou et al [ ], 2019 | Mean (SD) | Significant improvements for the IG compared with the CG across all measures | ↑ | ||||
| | O’Connell [ ], 2020 | Mean difference between before and after the intervention (N/R ) | Significant reduction in mindfulness after the intervention but no difference in FOMO, well-being, depression, or anxiety | ↕ | ||||
| | Esmaeili Rad and Ahmadi [ ], 2018 | Mean rank (N/R) | Significant improvements within the IG across all measures | ↑ | ||||
| | Throuvala et al [ ], 2020 | Mean (SD) | Significant improvements for the IG compared with the CG across all measures | ↑ | ||||
| | Zhou et al [ ], 2021 | Life satisfaction | SWLS | Mean (SD) | 0.50 (M) | Significant improvements for the IG compared with the CG | ↑ | |
| | Brailovskaia et al [ ], 2020 | Mean difference (95% CI) between the groups | No significant improvement in the IG compared with the CG across both measures | ↔ | ||||
| | Graham et al [ ], 2021 | Well-being | WEMWBS | Mean (SD) | 0.01 (X) | No significant improvement in the IG compared with the CG | ↔ | |
| | Hunt et al [ ], 2018 | Mean | — | Significant improvements in depression and loneliness for the IG compared with the CG; no significance for other outcomes | ↕ | |||
| | Hunt et al [ ], 2021 | Depression | BDI | Mean (SD) | — | Significant improvements for IG participants who were highly depressed compared with CG and AG participants | ↑ | |
| | Thai et al [ ], 2021 | Mean (SD) | No significant improvement in the IG compared with the CG across both measures | ↔ | ||||
a FOMO: fear of missing out.
b FoMOs: Fear of Missing Out Scale.
c WEMWBS: Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale.
d P<.001.
e M: medium.
f S: small.
g Beneficial effect.
h SWLS: Satisfaction With Life Scale.
i PANAS: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule.
j IG: intervention group.
k CG: control group.
l P<.05.
m L: Large.
n X: negligible.
o Mixed effects.
p SF-36: 36-item Short Form Health Survey.
q No effect.
r GAD-7: General Anxiety Disorder-7.
s OECD: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
t Not available (number in each group was not specified to calculate effect size).
u Average mean and SD reported across the 3 countries because the relationship among variables was the same across the countries. Estimates based on unadjusted means because the adjusted means were not provided.
v CES-D: Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale.
w PSS: Perceived Stress Scale.
x CES-D-20: Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, 20-item version.
y ULS-8: University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale.
z GHQ-30: General Health Questionnaire-30.
aa MAAS: Mindful Attention Awareness Scale.
ab PWB: Psychological Well-Being Scale.
ac N/R: not reported.
ad BDI: Beck Depression Inventory.
ae Comparing the IG between before the intervention and after. The effect of the intervention between the IG and the CG was not reported and could not be calculated.
af DASS-21: Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21.
ag AG: active group (limited use of social media at 30 minutes per day plus 1 action every 3 minutes, eg, posting and replying).
An overview of the effectiveness of the interventions by outcome is shown in Figure 2 . The most improved outcome was depression, with 70% (7/10) of the studies that measured this outcome showing a benefit of the intervention, with large or medium effect sizes being reported [ 22 , 38 , 44 , 46 , 48 , 54 , 55 ], whereas 30% (3/10) showed no effect of the intervention [ 35 , 52 , 56 ]. Anxiety was the next most improved outcome, with 50% (3/6) of the studies that assessed this outcome showing significant improvement in anxiety, with medium and large effect sizes being reported [ 38 , 39 , 44 ]; however, 50% (3/6) reported no effect on anxiety [ 35 , 54 , 56 ]. FOMO also improved in 50% (2/4) of the studies assessing this outcome, with medium and small effect sizes being reported [ 36 , 39 ], whereas 50% (2/4) found no effect on FOMO [ 35 , 54 ]. Brown and Kuss [ 36 ] also explored the effect on FOMO based on gender and identified no significant differences between men and women after the intervention. Mental well-being improved in 38% (3/8) of the studies assessing this outcome, with small, medium, and large effect sizes being reported [ 36 , 40 , 44 ], whereas 63% (5/8) found no significant improvements in mental well-being [ 35 , 42 , 45 , 53 , 54 ]. Self-esteem improved in 33% (1/3) of the studies assessing this outcome, with a medium effect size being reported [ 40 ], but 67% (2/3) found no effect of the intervention on self-esteem [ 47 , 54 ].
Summary of social media use intervention effects on mental well-being–related outcomes. FOMO: fear of missing out.
The other outcomes showed mixed and some negative results. Loneliness was reduced in 40% (2/5) of the studies that measured this outcome [ 22 , 54 ], whereas 40% (2/5) found no effect [ 42 , 51 ]; however, 1 (20%) of these 5 studies also found that the intervention increased loneliness, with a medium effect size being reported [ 50 ]. Mindfulness improved in 1 (50%) of the 2 studies that measured this outcome, with a large effect size being reported [ 39 ], but it was found to reduce in another study (1/2, 50%), with a small effect size being reported [ 35 ]. Life satisfaction improved in a third (3/9, 33%) of the studies that measured this outcome, with small, medium, and large effect sizes being reported [ 37 , 38 , 48 ], whereas another third (3/9, 33%) of the studies showed no effect [ 43 , 46 , 52 ], and 22% (2/9) found full abstinence to be harmful, reducing life satisfaction, with medium effect sizes being reported [ 50 , 51 ]. Of these 9 studies, 1 (11%) found mixed effects because a significant improvement in life satisfaction was found for women, with a large effect size being reported, but not for men [ 41 ]. For stress, 1 (25%) of the 4 studies that measured this outcome found reductions in stress, with a medium effect size being reported [ 39 ], but half (2/4, 50%) of the studies showed no effect of the intervention on stress [ 50 , 51 ], whereas 25% (1/4) showed mixed effects because absolute stress reduced but the relative stress score compared with the score at baseline did not [ 49 ]. For negative affect, 1 (20%) of the 5 studies that measured this outcome found that negative affect increased after the intervention, with a small effect size being reported [ 50 ], but the other studies (4/5, 80%) showed no effect [ 41 , 43 , 47 , 51 ]. Positive affect also did not change after the intervention in most of the studies (4/5, 80%) [ 43 , 47 , 50 , 51 ]; however, 20% (1/5) found mixed results because positive affect improved for women, with a small effect size being reported, but not for men [ 41 ].
Effectiveness by Intervention Type
Figure 3 shows an overview of the effectiveness of social media use interventions by intervention type. Therapy-based trials were the most effective because 83% (5/6) of the studies that assessed this intervention type found significant improvements in mental well-being outcomes [ 22 , 37 - 40 ], and only 17% (1/6) found mixed effects [ 35 ]. Full-abstinence interventions showed mixed effectiveness overall, with 42% (5/12) of them showing mixed effects [ 41 , 46 , 49 - 51 ], a third (4/12, 33%) showing no effect [ 42 , 43 , 45 , 47 ], and a quarter (3/12, 25%) showing a benefit of the intervention [ 36 , 44 , 48 ]. Social media use interventions that limited use also showed mixed effectiveness overall, with more than half (3/5, 60%) of the studies showing no effect [ 52 , 53 , 56 ] and 20% (1/5) showing an improvement [ 55 ] and mixed effects [ 54 ], respectively.
Summary of the effectiveness of the different types of social media use interventions on mental well-being–related outcomes.
Principal Findings
This review provides some evidence for the improvement of mental well-being in adults after social media use interventions. Of the 23 studies included in our analysis, 9 (39%) demonstrated improvements in mental well-being–related outcomes, with most of them (8/9, 89%) showing medium to large effect sizes. Depression was the most improved outcome overall, with 70% (7/10) of the studies that assessed depression showing improvement. Therapy-based interventions were the most effective, with 83% (5/6) of the studies evaluating these interventions showing improvement. Most of the studies (22/23, 96%) were of low quality, with significant issues related to selection bias and blinding affecting their quality.
This review found that interventions that simply restrict social media use or impose full abstinence may not have as much benefit for mental well-being as therapy-based interventions. These interventions used established approaches such as counseling and CBT-based techniques to encourage mindfulness and reflection on how social media activity affects thoughts, emotions, and behavior. Therapy-based interventions may be more effective in causing behavior change in users than abstinence by enabling them to replace negative actions with structured goals and positive thinking and by providing motivation [ 58 ]. Therapy-based interventions may also help to reduce FOMO by encouraging individuals to reevaluate life priorities, focus on other activities, and reduce social comparison and envy [ 36 , 39 ].
We found limiting social media use to be the least effective method. One hypothesis is that users would still have been exposed to social media during the trial and may have intensified their use owing to an awareness of a time restriction. This would have offset any potential positive improvement. Adherence to limiting social media use or abstaining from social media use may also have been challenging for participants, and adherence is difficult to track and measure across devices used to access social media [ 37 ]. In 1 study, 19.4% (35/180) of the participants were excluded from analysis because they were unable to abstain from social media for >2 days, which may give an indication of compliance rates in these studies [ 42 ]. These findings overall suggest that health and care professionals, mental health charities, and public health bodies should encourage the use of therapy-based approaches to manage social media use rather than focusing on reducing time spent on social media. These interventions can also be relatively cost-effective because this review showed improvements in participants’ well-being after they used internet-based self-guided therapy-based interventions to manage problematic social media use. However, delivering therapy-based approaches to manage (problematic) social media use is currently limited owing to resource and time constraints in health and care systems.
This review found that 3 (13%) of the 23 studies showed a reduction in some mental well-being–related outcomes after the intervention, such as life satisfaction and loneliness [ 35 , 50 , 51 ]. The causes for these findings could be due to methodological reasons because the authors of 1 (33%) of these 3 studies proposed that their study participants were unaware at the time of recruitment that abstinence from social media may be required [ 50 ], which may have made participants less receptive to the intervention and eliminated the beneficial consequences of abstinence that may have arisen in other studies. Previous research also suggests that reducing or limiting social media use can reduce mental well-being by causing a loss of social connection and increasing loneliness [ 9 ]. Some individuals are reported to find social connections easier to maintain over the web, with social media enabling users to preserve their relationships [ 59 , 60 ]. Social media can also help to create and maintain social capital, fostering inclusion within web-based communities [ 61 ]; for instance, members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and similar minority community report greater levels of social support over the web [ 62 ].
This review supports evidence from previous studies that show that the link between social media use and mental well-being is conflicting, with there being some benefits and some disadvantages of social media use related to mental well-being [ 9 , 25 ]. The variation in effectiveness across the studies could be due to individual differences [ 63 ]. Different people will have different responses to social media, and self-regulatory capabilities may be affected by factors such as gender, age, and personality traits [ 64 ]. Previous research has shown that those with neurotic or introverted tendencies have a higher risk of addiction to internet content [ 65 ]. Others may not be affected by social media use owing to elevated levels of digital resilience. Digital resilience is a person’s ability to cope with the negative consequences of being over the web, such as cyberbullying and misleading information [ 66 , 67 ]. Gender has been found to be a moderating factor in previous studies examining the relationship between social media use and mental well-being, with adolescent girls seeming to experience more negative effects from social media use than adolescent boys [ 4 , 68 , 69 ]. In this review, we found that 1 (4%) of the 23 studies showed that abstinence increased positive affect and life satisfaction for women but not for men, also suggesting that gender may affect the relationship between social media use and mental well-being [ 41 ]. Future research is needed to explore who may be most affected by problematic social media use to enable the development of more targeted interventions to improve mental well-being.
Limitations
There was a large degree of heterogeneity in the studies reviewed, with several different intervention types and outcome measures used. Therefore, it was not possible to conduct a meta-analysis to provide integrated results on the outcomes of the social media use interventions [ 70 ]. A further limitation to this review is that the search strategy may not have retrieved all relevant papers owing to the inclusion of English-language publications only. Our review also did not include unpublished studies; thus, it was not possible to estimate the degree of publication bias. This review also did not explore the impact of the type of social media use, such as passive use or active use, because this was out of the scope of the review, but this could affect mental well-being. Active use denotes direct messaging, posting, or responding to content, whereas passive use corresponds to scrolling and browsing profiles. Previous literature has suggested that passive use is associated with greater declines in subjective well-being [ 71 , 72 ], but a recent review found that this was not supported across 40 survey-based studies [ 73 ]. The review suggested that future studies should explore the characteristics of the content of social media as well as its senders and receivers to understand how different uses of social media affect mental well-being [ 73 ]. Understanding this relationship could help to develop more targeted problematic social media use interventions that move beyond simply aiming to reduce time spent on social media by targeting the reduction of specific negative activities or interactions.
A major limitation of the studies included in this review is that the majority (16/23, 70%) relied largely on convenience samples of those who were likely to be interested in reducing their social media use and improving their mental health. In addition, more than half (16/23, 70%) of the studies recruited university students. Therefore, these results must be interpreted with caution because they are not generalizable to all adults and are likely to be more relevant for young adults. Furthermore, none of the studies received a strong global score for quality using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool. The sustainability of these interventions is also difficult to establish because most of the interventions (20/23, 87%) lasted <1 month, and the outcomes were assessed immediately after the interventions. Only 2 (9%) of the 23 studies included a longer-term measure. Brailovskaia et al [ 52 ] found consistency with their short-term recorded outcomes, with no significant difference in life satisfaction and depression between groups 3 months after the intervention. By contrast, Chen et al [ 22 ] found that the significant improvements in depression and loneliness for the intervention group continued to remain at 2 months.
There is some evidence that social media use interventions are effective in improving mental well-being in adults, especially for depression and when using therapy-based interventions. Current experimental research is of low quality, with issues of selection bias making it difficult to generalize the findings. Further experimental and longitudinal research is needed with representative samples to investigate who may benefit most from social media use interventions. Health and care professionals should be aware of the growing evidence that reducing social media use alone is unlikely to benefit mental well-being. Taking a more therapy-based approach and reflecting on how and why individuals are interacting with social media and managing these behaviors could help to improve mental well-being.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the librarians at University College London for helping them to refine the search strategy. RP holds a fellowship (MH013) funded by the Three National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Research Schools Mental Health Programme. This research is also supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North Thames. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Abbreviations
| CBT | cognitive behavioral therapy |
| FOMO | fear of missing out |
| PRISMA | Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses |
Multimedia Appendix 1
Multimedia appendix 2, multimedia appendix 3.
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
- DOI: 10.1080/19932820.2020.1846861
- Corpus ID: 227234812
Characteristics of social media ‘detoxification’ in university students
- J. El-Khoury , Riwa Haidar , +2 authors Ghaidaa Majari
- Published in Libyan Journal of Medicine 29 November 2020
13 Citations
Exploring the impact of social media on anxiety among university students in the united kingdom: qualitative study, psychometric properties of the social media addiction scale (smas) on chilean university students, digital detriments: unraveling the psychological consequences of social media, problematic social media use and its relationship with depression or anxiety: a systematic review, social media disorder, mental health, and validation of the chinese version of 27-item social media disorder scale in chinese college students, the perceptions of social media users of digital detox apps considering personality traits, problematic social networking site use-effects on mental health and the brain, social media use and its impact on adult's mental health and well-being: a scoping review., the attitudes of students toward the use of smartphones, “to evaluate the effectiveness of planned teaching program [ptp] on knowledge regarding digital detoxification among students in selected junior colleges”., 26 references, problematic social media use: results from a large-scale nationally representative adolescent sample, the relations among social media addiction, self-esteem, and life satisfaction in university students, social media use is (weakly) related to psychological distress, facebook addiction and loneliness in the post-graduate students of a university in southern india, the relationship between social networking addiction and academic performance in iranian students of medical sciences: a cross-sectional study, association between facebook dependence and poor sleep quality: a study in a sample of undergraduate students in peru, the relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: findings from a large national survey., the social media disorder scale, internet addiction among adolescents in lebanon, facebook addiction and its relationship with mental health among thai high school students., related papers.
Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
These preliminary findings show that 'social media detoxification' is a phenomenon understood and used by university students to moderate their social media use. Wide variability in its application and effects is noted in our sample. KEYWORDS: Social media detoxification, digital detoxification, social media addiction, internet-use ...
Both the public and scientific community use different terms when it comes to non-use of electronical devices. Usually, terms like abstinence, break, disconnection, detox, timeout, or unplugging are used (e.g., Brown & Kuss, 2020; Fioravanti et al., 2019).The important aspect that these terms have in common is they describe a period during which use of digital devices, e.g., tablets, is ...
Abstract. This article explores how disruption of habitual social media use. reshapes the information behavior of emerging adults. Using the core ideas from. theories about the social acceleration ...
Despite their increasing popularity, especially among young adults, there is a dearth of research examining the effectiveness of digital detoxes focused on restricting or limiting social media use. As such, the purpose of this exploratory study was to create and carry out a social media digital detox among young adults and evaluate its effectiveness with regards to smartphone and social media ...
Digital and social media detox. In recent years, a growing body of research has focused on digital detox (Wilcockson et al., 2019; Schmuck, 2020; Syvertsen and Enli, 2020; Radtke et al., 2021). (Wilcockson et al., 2019) studied the effects of smartphone abstention on three variables (i.e., mood, anxiety, and craving).In their research, participants were required to refrain from using their ...
Personal motivation likely plays a large role in the decision to try social media abstinence, and research investigating personal autonomy—choosing to "detox"—should be conducted. Third, as a matter of experimental design, we determined which social media platforms participants were asked not to use on abstinence days.
Brown L., Kuss D. J. (2020). Fear of missing out, mental wellbeing, and social connectedness: A seven-day social media abstinence trial. ... Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety ... (2017). "Caught in the net": Online and social media disappointment and detox. Media Resistance, 77 ...
This article explores how disruption of habitual social media use reshapes the information behavior of emerging adults. Using the core ideas from theories about the social acceleration of time, reverse domestication and social media literacies, we designed a study where full-time BA-level students (N = 42) were asked to keep a diary about quitting social media for five consecutive days.
These preliminary findings show that 'social media detoxification' is a phenomenon understood and used by university students to moderate their social media use. Wide variability in its application and effects is noted in our sample. KEYWORDS: Social media detoxification. digital detoxification. social media addiction.
Social Media Detox: Relapse Predictors. Ofir Turel a,b,* Isaac Vaghefi. c. a Decision Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, USA 3620 South. McClintock Ave. Los ...
There is some evidence that social media use interventions are effective in improving mental well-being in adults, especially for depression and when using therapy-based interventions. Current experimental research is of low quality, with issues of selection bias making it difficult to generalize the findings.
2.1 Digital and social media detox. In recent years, a growing body of research has focused on digital detox (Wilcockson et al., 2019; Schmuck, 2020; Syvertsen and Enli, 2020; Radtke et al., 2021). (Wilcockson et al., 2019) studied the effects of smartphone abstention on three variables (i.e., mood, anxiety, and craving).In their research, participants were required to refrain from using their ...
Restricted social media use Gui et al. (2017 ... Syvertsen T, Enli G (2019) Digital detox: media resistance and the. ... Springer Nature supports a reasonable amount of sharing of research papers ...
social connectedness during a digital detox affect individual well-being. Based on this argument, this research-in-progress paper focuses on the following research question: RQ: How do periods of digital detox impact perceived social connectedness? To answer this question, we outline a mixed-method approach consisting of a quantitative experiment
Digital detox can be defined as a periodic disconnection from social or online media, or strategies to reduce digital media involvement. Digital detox stands in a long tradition of media resistance and resistance to new communication technologies, and non-use of media, but advocates balance and awareness more than permanent disconnection.
Preliminary findings show that 'social media detoxification' is a phenomenon understood and used by university students to moderate their social media use. ABSTRACT The multiplication of social networking sites has led to increased frequency of use among young adults. While the association with mental wellbeing is still controversial, high levels of social media use were correlated with ...
Digital detox interventions have been suggested as a solution to reduce negative impacts from smartphone use on outcomes like well-being or social relationships. Digital detox is defined as timeouts from using electronic devices (e.g., smartphones), either completely or for specific subsets of smartphone use.
This study serves as a pilot to explore the extent of exposure to social media detoxification in a sample of university students. The study reveals insight on their awareness of social media detoxification, their perso-nal engagement in it and the presence of any mental health implications. 2. Method.
More precisely, we present the design of NUDGE, a novel browser extension that aims to make social media less addictive by delivering digital nudges founded on behavioral science. We conducted a ...
Keywords: FOMO, Social Media Detox, Social Media Addiction Introduction In this era, globalization has sparked the transformation of human life from an agrarian society to ... Based on research (Hariadi, 2018) regarding the relationship between Fear of Missing Out and ... This paper is based on the library search method, which is a research ...
Keywords: Information behavior Self-reflexivity Social media use Students 1 Introduction In our paper, we discuss the initial results of our recent study exploring how disruption of habitual social media use reshapes information behavior of young adults. By con-textualizing this study in theories of accelerating social time [1, 2], and uses and
Social Media Usage and Digital Detoxification on T eenagers in Medan. DOI: 10.5220/0010021403510355 In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Social and Political Dev elopment (ICOSOP 3 2019) - Social Engineering Governance for the People , T echnology and Infrastructure in
Abstract. The purpose of this study was to investigate the perceptions of users about using digital detox applications and to display relationships among personality traits and technology-related variables. This study was designed using survey approach and employed Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GSCA).