Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
- Knowledge Base
Methodology
- Ethical Considerations in Research | Types & Examples
![](http://domyassignment.website/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Ethical Considerations in Research | Types & Examples
Published on October 18, 2021 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on May 9, 2024.
Ethical considerations in research are a set of principles that guide your research designs and practices. Scientists and researchers must always adhere to a certain code of conduct when collecting data from people.
The goals of human research often include understanding real-life phenomena, studying effective treatments, investigating behaviors, and improving lives in other ways. What you decide to research and how you conduct that research involve key ethical considerations.
These considerations work to
- protect the rights of research participants
- enhance research validity
- maintain scientific or academic integrity
Table of contents
Why do research ethics matter, getting ethical approval for your study, types of ethical issues, voluntary participation, informed consent, confidentiality, potential for harm, results communication, examples of ethical failures, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about research ethics.
Research ethics matter for scientific integrity, human rights and dignity, and collaboration between science and society. These principles make sure that participation in studies is voluntary, informed, and safe for research subjects.
You’ll balance pursuing important research objectives with using ethical research methods and procedures. It’s always necessary to prevent permanent or excessive harm to participants, whether inadvertent or not.
Defying research ethics will also lower the credibility of your research because it’s hard for others to trust your data if your methods are morally questionable.
Even if a research idea is valuable to society, it doesn’t justify violating the human rights or dignity of your study participants.
Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services
Discover proofreading & editing
Before you start any study involving data collection with people, you’ll submit your research proposal to an institutional review board (IRB) .
An IRB is a committee that checks whether your research aims and research design are ethically acceptable and follow your institution’s code of conduct. They check that your research materials and procedures are up to code.
If successful, you’ll receive IRB approval, and you can begin collecting data according to the approved procedures. If you want to make any changes to your procedures or materials, you’ll need to submit a modification application to the IRB for approval.
If unsuccessful, you may be asked to re-submit with modifications or your research proposal may receive a rejection. To get IRB approval, it’s important to explicitly note how you’ll tackle each of the ethical issues that may arise in your study.
There are several ethical issues you should always pay attention to in your research design, and these issues can overlap with each other.
You’ll usually outline ways you’ll deal with each issue in your research proposal if you plan to collect data from participants.
Voluntary participation | Your participants are free to opt in or out of the study at any point in time. |
---|---|
Informed consent | Participants know the purpose, benefits, risks, and funding behind the study before they agree or decline to join. |
Anonymity | You don’t know the identities of the participants. Personally identifiable data is not collected. |
Confidentiality | You know who the participants are but you keep that information hidden from everyone else. You anonymize personally identifiable data so that it can’t be linked to other data by anyone else. |
Potential for harm | Physical, social, psychological and all other types of harm are kept to an absolute minimum. |
Results communication | You ensure your work is free of or research misconduct, and you accurately represent your results. |
Voluntary participation means that all research subjects are free to choose to participate without any pressure or coercion.
All participants are able to withdraw from, or leave, the study at any point without feeling an obligation to continue. Your participants don’t need to provide a reason for leaving the study.
It’s important to make it clear to participants that there are no negative consequences or repercussions to their refusal to participate. After all, they’re taking the time to help you in the research process , so you should respect their decisions without trying to change their minds.
Voluntary participation is an ethical principle protected by international law and many scientific codes of conduct.
Take special care to ensure there’s no pressure on participants when you’re working with vulnerable groups of people who may find it hard to stop the study even when they want to.
Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
- Academic style
- Vague sentences
- Style consistency
See an example
![dissertation and ethics dissertation and ethics](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/dissertation-proofreading-service.png)
Informed consent refers to a situation in which all potential participants receive and understand all the information they need to decide whether they want to participate. This includes information about the study’s benefits, risks, funding, and institutional approval.
You make sure to provide all potential participants with all the relevant information about
- what the study is about
- the risks and benefits of taking part
- how long the study will take
- your supervisor’s contact information and the institution’s approval number
Usually, you’ll provide participants with a text for them to read and ask them if they have any questions. If they agree to participate, they can sign or initial the consent form. Note that this may not be sufficient for informed consent when you work with particularly vulnerable groups of people.
If you’re collecting data from people with low literacy, make sure to verbally explain the consent form to them before they agree to participate.
For participants with very limited English proficiency, you should always translate the study materials or work with an interpreter so they have all the information in their first language.
In research with children, you’ll often need informed permission for their participation from their parents or guardians. Although children cannot give informed consent, it’s best to also ask for their assent (agreement) to participate, depending on their age and maturity level.
Anonymity means that you don’t know who the participants are and you can’t link any individual participant to their data.
You can only guarantee anonymity by not collecting any personally identifying information—for example, names, phone numbers, email addresses, IP addresses, physical characteristics, photos, and videos.
In many cases, it may be impossible to truly anonymize data collection . For example, data collected in person or by phone cannot be considered fully anonymous because some personal identifiers (demographic information or phone numbers) are impossible to hide.
You’ll also need to collect some identifying information if you give your participants the option to withdraw their data at a later stage.
Data pseudonymization is an alternative method where you replace identifying information about participants with pseudonymous, or fake, identifiers. The data can still be linked to participants but it’s harder to do so because you separate personal information from the study data.
Confidentiality means that you know who the participants are, but you remove all identifying information from your report.
All participants have a right to privacy, so you should protect their personal data for as long as you store or use it. Even when you can’t collect data anonymously, you should secure confidentiality whenever you can.
Some research designs aren’t conducive to confidentiality, but it’s important to make all attempts and inform participants of the risks involved.
As a researcher, you have to consider all possible sources of harm to participants. Harm can come in many different forms.
- Psychological harm: Sensitive questions or tasks may trigger negative emotions such as shame or anxiety.
- Social harm: Participation can involve social risks, public embarrassment, or stigma.
- Physical harm: Pain or injury can result from the study procedures.
- Legal harm: Reporting sensitive data could lead to legal risks or a breach of privacy.
It’s best to consider every possible source of harm in your study as well as concrete ways to mitigate them. Involve your supervisor to discuss steps for harm reduction.
Make sure to disclose all possible risks of harm to participants before the study to get informed consent. If there is a risk of harm, prepare to provide participants with resources or counseling or medical services if needed.
Some of these questions may bring up negative emotions, so you inform participants about the sensitive nature of the survey and assure them that their responses will be confidential.
The way you communicate your research results can sometimes involve ethical issues. Good science communication is honest, reliable, and credible. It’s best to make your results as transparent as possible.
Take steps to actively avoid plagiarism and research misconduct wherever possible.
Plagiarism means submitting others’ works as your own. Although it can be unintentional, copying someone else’s work without proper credit amounts to stealing. It’s an ethical problem in research communication because you may benefit by harming other researchers.
Self-plagiarism is when you republish or re-submit parts of your own papers or reports without properly citing your original work.
This is problematic because you may benefit from presenting your ideas as new and original even though they’ve already been published elsewhere in the past. You may also be infringing on your previous publisher’s copyright, violating an ethical code, or wasting time and resources by doing so.
In extreme cases of self-plagiarism, entire datasets or papers are sometimes duplicated. These are major ethical violations because they can skew research findings if taken as original data.
You notice that two published studies have similar characteristics even though they are from different years. Their sample sizes, locations, treatments, and results are highly similar, and the studies share one author in common.
Research misconduct
Research misconduct means making up or falsifying data, manipulating data analyses, or misrepresenting results in research reports. It’s a form of academic fraud.
These actions are committed intentionally and can have serious consequences; research misconduct is not a simple mistake or a point of disagreement about data analyses.
Research misconduct is a serious ethical issue because it can undermine academic integrity and institutional credibility. It leads to a waste of funding and resources that could have been used for alternative research.
Later investigations revealed that they fabricated and manipulated their data to show a nonexistent link between vaccines and autism. Wakefield also neglected to disclose important conflicts of interest, and his medical license was taken away.
This fraudulent work sparked vaccine hesitancy among parents and caregivers. The rate of MMR vaccinations in children fell sharply, and measles outbreaks became more common due to a lack of herd immunity.
Research scandals with ethical failures are littered throughout history, but some took place not that long ago.
Some scientists in positions of power have historically mistreated or even abused research participants to investigate research problems at any cost. These participants were prisoners, under their care, or otherwise trusted them to treat them with dignity.
To demonstrate the importance of research ethics, we’ll briefly review two research studies that violated human rights in modern history.
These experiments were inhumane and resulted in trauma, permanent disabilities, or death in many cases.
After some Nazi doctors were put on trial for their crimes, the Nuremberg Code of research ethics for human experimentation was developed in 1947 to establish a new standard for human experimentation in medical research.
In reality, the actual goal was to study the effects of the disease when left untreated, and the researchers never informed participants about their diagnoses or the research aims.
Although participants experienced severe health problems, including blindness and other complications, the researchers only pretended to provide medical care.
When treatment became possible in 1943, 11 years after the study began, none of the participants were offered it, despite their health conditions and high risk of death.
Ethical failures like these resulted in severe harm to participants, wasted resources, and lower trust in science and scientists. This is why all research institutions have strict ethical guidelines for performing research.
If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
- Normal distribution
- Measures of central tendency
- Chi square tests
- Confidence interval
- Quartiles & Quantiles
- Cluster sampling
- Stratified sampling
- Thematic analysis
- Cohort study
- Peer review
- Ethnography
Research bias
- Implicit bias
- Cognitive bias
- Conformity bias
- Hawthorne effect
- Availability heuristic
- Attrition bias
- Social desirability bias
Ethical considerations in research are a set of principles that guide your research designs and practices. These principles include voluntary participation, informed consent, anonymity, confidentiality, potential for harm, and results communication.
Scientists and researchers must always adhere to a certain code of conduct when collecting data from others .
These considerations protect the rights of research participants, enhance research validity , and maintain scientific integrity.
Research ethics matter for scientific integrity, human rights and dignity, and collaboration between science and society. These principles make sure that participation in studies is voluntary, informed, and safe.
Anonymity means you don’t know who the participants are, while confidentiality means you know who they are but remove identifying information from your research report. Both are important ethical considerations .
You can only guarantee anonymity by not collecting any personally identifying information—for example, names, phone numbers, email addresses, IP addresses, physical characteristics, photos, or videos.
You can keep data confidential by using aggregate information in your research report, so that you only refer to groups of participants rather than individuals.
These actions are committed intentionally and can have serious consequences; research misconduct is not a simple mistake or a point of disagreement but a serious ethical failure.
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Bhandari, P. (2024, May 09). Ethical Considerations in Research | Types & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved July 22, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/research-ethics/
Is this article helpful?
![dissertation and ethics Pritha Bhandari](https://www.scribbr.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/pritha-author-pic.jpg)
Pritha Bhandari
Other students also liked, data collection | definition, methods & examples, what is self-plagiarism | definition & how to avoid it, how to avoid plagiarism | tips on citing sources, what is your plagiarism score.
![dissertation and ethics loader](https://falconediting.com/static/img/logo.png)
Ethical Considerations in Dissertation Writing: Best Practices
![dissertation and ethics Ethical Considerations in Dissertation Writing: Best Practices](https://falconediting.com/media/blog/c0e2bc51-8607-4393-a4fb-99313d67984f.webp)
Writing a dissertation is a significant milestone in an academic journey. It's a testament to your research skills, critical thinking, and ability to contribute to your field of study. However, amidst the rigorous research and writing process, it's crucial not to overlook the ethical considerations that underpin academic work. Upholding ethical principles in dissertation writing is not just a formality; it's a fundamental aspect of maintaining the integrity and credibility of your research. In this article, we'll explore some best practices for ensuring ethical conduct in your dissertation writing.
Research Ethics and Compliance:
Ethical considerations are the foundation of sound research practices. Ensuring that your dissertation adheres to ethical principles and guidelines is not just a formality; it's a fundamental aspect of maintaining the integrity and credibility of your research.
Understanding Research Ethics:
Research ethics encompass a set of principles and values that guide researchers in conducting their studies ethically and responsibly. These principles are particularly critical when your research involves human subjects, animals, or sensitive data. The following are key aspects of research ethics that every dissertation writer should be aware of:
1. Informed Consent: When your research involves human participants, obtaining informed consent is paramount. Informed consent means that participants are fully aware of the nature of the study, their involvement, potential risks, and their rights. It is essential to provide participants with clear and understandable information and allow them to voluntarily consent or decline participation.
2. Protecting Privacy: Respect for participants' privacy is another crucial ethical consideration. Ensure that you take measures to protect the confidentiality of individuals involved in your research. Anonymize data by removing any identifying information or use pseudonyms to safeguard participants' identities.
3. Honesty and Transparency: Transparency and honesty are fundamental to research ethics. Be honest about your research objectives, methodologies, and sources of data. Report your findings truthfully, even if they do not align with your initial hypotheses. Avoid any form of data manipulation or selective reporting that could compromise the integrity of your research.
4. Data Management: Implement robust data management practices from the start of your research. Keep comprehensive records of data collection, analysis, and storage. Ensure that your data is securely stored and properly backed up. Ethical data management helps ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of your findings.
5. Ethical Review Boards: Many institutions require that research involving human subjects undergo ethical review by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or ethics committee. These boards assess research proposals to ensure that they comply with ethical standards and safeguard the well-being and rights of research participants. If your dissertation involves human subjects, it's essential to seek IRB approval.
6. Animal Research Ethics: For research involving animals, adherence to ethical guidelines is crucial. Ensure that your research complies with the "Three Rs" principles: Replacement (using alternatives to animals), Reduction (minimizing the number of animals used), and Refinement (enhancing animal welfare and minimizing harm). Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) oversee ethical considerations in animal research.
7. Conflicts of Interest: Declare any potential conflicts of interest that could compromise the objectivity of your research. Conflicts of interest might include financial interests, personal relationships, or any factors that could influence your work's integrity. Transparency is vital in maintaining ethical research practices.
Receive Free Grammar and Publishing Tips via Email
Transparency and honesty.
Transparency and honesty are foundational ethical principles that must guide every aspect of your dissertation research and writing process. These principles ensure that your work is credible, reliable, and contributes to the advancement of knowledge with integrity.
Clear Research Objectives: Begin by articulating your research objectives with clarity and precision. Your dissertation's introduction should provide a transparent overview of the goals and intentions of your study. Clearly state the questions you seek to answer and the hypotheses you aim to test. By doing so, you set the stage for an honest and focused investigation.
Open Methodology: Transparency extends to your research methodology. Describe your research methods in detail, outlining how data will be collected, analyzed, and interpreted. Readers should be able to understand the steps you've taken to arrive at your conclusions. Be open about any limitations or constraints that might affect the validity of your research.
Honest Reporting of Findings: Honesty is especially critical when it comes to reporting your research findings. Regardless of whether your results align with your initial hypotheses, it's essential to present them accurately. Avoid the temptation to selectively report data or manipulate results to fit preconceived notions. Dishonest reporting erodes the trustworthiness of your work.
Ethical Consideration of Data: Ethical treatment of data is an integral aspect of transparency. Ensure that your data collection and analysis processes are free from bias or manipulation. Handle data with care, maintaining its integrity throughout the research process. If you encounter unexpected results or data that challenges your initial assumptions, address these findings honestly.
Citing Sources and Avoiding Plagiarism: Citing sources properly is a non-negotiable aspect of transparency and honesty. Whenever you use someone else's work, ideas, or words, provide appropriate citations and references. Plagiarism, whether intentional or unintentional, is a breach of academic integrity and can have serious consequences. Use citation styles recommended by your institution or field.
Acknowledging Limitations: Every research project has limitations, and it's essential to acknowledge them openly. Whether limitations relate to sample size, data availability, or methodological constraints, recognizing these factors demonstrates transparency. Discuss how these limitations may have influenced your results and interpretations.
Reproducibility and Replicability: In the spirit of transparency, aim to make your research reproducible and replicable. Clearly document your research processes, including data collection instruments and analysis procedures. Share your data and methodology whenever possible, allowing others to verify and build upon your work.
Ethical Dilemmas and Challenges: In some cases, you may encounter ethical dilemmas during your research. It's vital to address these challenges honestly and seek guidance from ethical review boards or mentors when necessary. Being transparent about how you navigated ethical complexities showcases your commitment to ethical research conduct.
Transparency and honesty are non-negotiable ethical principles in dissertation writing. They underpin the credibility of your research and demonstrate your commitment to responsible scholarship. By consistently upholding these principles, you contribute to the integrity of academic research and ensure that your dissertation is a trustworthy source of knowledge in your field.
Proper Citation and Avoiding Plagiarism
Proper citation and the avoidance of plagiarism are not just matters of academic etiquette; they are ethical imperatives that uphold the integrity of your dissertation. In the world of research and academia, giving credit where it's due is paramount.
Understanding Plagiarism: Plagiarism involves using someone else's work, ideas, or words without proper attribution. It is considered a severe breach of academic integrity and can have far-reaching consequences, including academic penalties and damage to your reputation. To avoid plagiarism, follow these essential guidelines:
1. Cite Sources Accurately:
Whenever you incorporate information, ideas, or text from a source, whether it's a book, journal article, website, or any other medium, cite it appropriately. Different academic disciplines use specific citation styles (e.g., APA, MLA, Chicago), so be sure to follow the style recommended by your institution or field.
2. Quoting and Paraphrasing: When using direct quotes from a source, enclose the text in quotation marks and provide a citation to the source. For paraphrased content (putting someone else's ideas into your own words), you must still acknowledge the original source with a citation. Paraphrasing does not make the information your own; it's essential to credit the original author.
3. Common Knowledge vs. Specific Information: Not all information requires citation. Common knowledge, which includes widely accepted facts and information that is widely known and undisputed, does not need to be cited. However, if you are in doubt about whether something qualifies as common knowledge, it's better to provide a citation.
4. Self-Plagiarism: Beware of self-plagiarism, which occurs when you reuse your previously published work without proper citation. While it's acceptable to build on your previous research, you must clearly indicate that you are referencing your earlier work and provide appropriate citations.
5. Citation Management Tools: Consider using citation management tools like EndNote, Zotero, or Mendeley to help you organize your sources, create citations, and maintain proper records of your references. These tools can significantly streamline the citation process and reduce the risk of errors.
6. Plagiarism Detection Software: Many institutions use plagiarism detection software to scan academic papers for potential plagiarism. Before submitting your dissertation, consider running it through such software to identify and rectify any unintentional instances of plagiarism.
7. Ethical Paraphrasing: When paraphrasing, ensure that you are not merely rearranging words or sentence structure but genuinely reinterpreting the content in your own words. Ethical paraphrasing respects the original author's ideas while presenting them from your perspective.
8. Academic Integrity Workshops: Some universities offer academic integrity workshops or courses that can help you better understand plagiarism and proper citation practices. Taking advantage of these resources can enhance your awareness and skills in this area.
Proper citation and avoiding plagiarism are not just technical aspects of dissertation writing but critical ethical considerations. By consistently citing sources accurately and respecting the intellectual property of others, you not only uphold academic integrity but also contribute to the trustworthiness of your research and the broader academic community.
Informed Consent and Privacy
When conducting research that involves human participants, whether through surveys, interviews, or experiments, it is essential to prioritize informed consent and safeguard the privacy of individuals. These ethical considerations are not only a moral obligation but also a legal and academic requirement in many cases.
Informed Consent:
Informed consent is the cornerstone of ethical research involving human subjects. It refers to the process of ensuring that participants fully understand the nature of the study, their role in it, potential risks, benefits, and their rights before they agree to participate. Here are key principles to keep in mind:
Clear Communication: Provide clear and comprehensive information about your research. This includes the purpose of the study, what participants will be asked to do, how their data will be used, and any potential risks or discomforts involved.
Voluntary Participation: Participation should be entirely voluntary. Participants should not feel coerced, pressured, or obligated to take part in your research. They should be free to decline or withdraw at any time without consequences.
Informed Decision-Making: Ensure that participants have the capacity to make an informed decision. This means they must have the cognitive ability to understand the information provided. If your study involves vulnerable populations, such as children or individuals with cognitive impairments, additional safeguards may be required.
Documentation: Always obtain written informed consent from participants, unless a waiver has been approved by an ethics review board. This written record should include all relevant information about the study and should be signed and dated by the participant.
Privacy Protection:
Respecting the privacy of research participants is another critical ethical consideration. Protecting their personal information and data is not just an ethical obligation but also a legal requirement in many jurisdictions. Here's how you can uphold privacy:
Anonymity and Confidentiality: When collecting data, take measures to ensure that participants' identities remain anonymous or confidential. Use participant codes or pseudonyms instead of real names, and store sensitive data securely.
Data Security: Implement robust data security practices to safeguard participant data. This includes encrypting electronic data, using secure storage methods, and restricting access to authorized personnel only.
Data Sharing: If you plan to share or publish your research data, do so in a way that protects participants' privacy. Avoid disclosing any information that could potentially identify individuals.
Ethical Review Boards: In many cases, research involving human subjects must undergo ethical review by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or ethics committee. These bodies assess the ethical aspects of your research, including informed consent and privacy protections.
Data Retention: Develop clear data retention and disposal policies. Determine how long you will retain participant data and when it will be securely deleted or destroyed.
Participant Debriefing: After the study is completed, provide participants with a debriefing that explains the purpose and outcomes of the research. This ensures that participants leave the study with a clear understanding of their contribution.
Data Management and Retention
Effective data management and retention practices are essential for maintaining the integrity and credibility of your research. Properly handling and preserving research data not only ensures the accuracy and reliability of your findings but also aligns with ethical and legal requirements.
Data Management Principles:
Organized Data Collection: Start with organized data collection. Design clear data collection protocols, including data entry forms, surveys, or experimental procedures. Ensure that data are collected consistently and accurately.
Secure Data Storage: Store your research data securely. Whether your data is in digital or physical form, protect it from unauthorized access, loss, or damage. Use encryption for digital files and implement physical security measures for hard copies.
Data Backups: Regularly back up your data to prevent loss due to technical failures or unforeseen events. Maintain multiple copies of your data, both on-site and off-site, to safeguard against data loss.
Version Control: If you make changes to your data during the research process, use version control to track modifications. This ensures transparency and allows you to revert to previous versions if needed.
Metadata Documentation: Document metadata – information about your data – comprehensively. Metadata should include details about data sources, variables, data collection dates, and any data transformations or cleaning processes.
Data Cleaning and Validation: Perform thorough data cleaning and validation to identify and correct errors or inconsistencies in your dataset. Transparently document any data cleaning steps you take.
Data Ownership and Access: Clarify data ownership and access rights from the beginning of your research. If you are working with collaborators or collecting data from external sources, establish agreements regarding data ownership and sharing.
Data Retention Practices:
Retention Policies: Develop clear data retention policies that outline how long you will retain research data after the completion of your project. These policies should consider legal requirements, funding agency guidelines, and the value of the data.
Anonymization and De-identification: If you plan to share your research data with others, consider anonymizing or de-identifying the data to protect participants' privacy. Remove any identifying information that could link data to specific individuals.
Secure Archiving: For long-term data retention, consider using secure data archiving services or repositories that comply with data preservation standards. These repositories can ensure the long-term accessibility and integrity of your data.
Data Destruction: If you no longer require your research data or have exceeded the designated retention period, follow proper data destruction procedures. Shred physical documents, securely delete digital files, and ensure that no residual copies exist.
Documentation of Retention and Destruction: Maintain detailed records of data retention and destruction activities. This documentation serves as evidence that you have followed appropriate data management and retention practices.
Compliance with Regulations: Be aware of any legal or regulatory requirements related to data retention in your field or jurisdiction. Compliance with these regulations is crucial to avoid legal complications.
Ethical Considerations: Uphold ethical considerations when retaining or disposing of data. Ensure that data containing sensitive or personally identifiable information are treated with utmost care and respect for privacy.
Effective data management and retention practices not only protect your research but also facilitate data sharing and transparency within the academic community. By adhering to these principles, you contribute to the responsible conduct of research and enhance the credibility of your work.
In conclusion, ethical considerations are the bedrock of rigorous and credible dissertation writing. By following these best practices, you not only demonstrate your commitment to ethical research but also contribute to the advancement of knowledge with integrity and responsibility. Your dissertation should not only be a testament to your academic prowess but also a reflection of your ethical values as a scholar.
Connect With Us
![dissertation and ethics Facebook](https://falconediting.com/static/img/social/fb-icon.png)
Dissertation Editing and Proofreading Services Discount (New for 2018)
May 3, 2017.
For March through May 2018 ONLY, our professional dissertation editing se...
Thesis Editing and Proofreading Services Discount (New for 2018)
For March through May 2018 ONLY, our thesis editing service is discounted...
Neurology includes Falcon Scientific Editing in Professional Editing Help List
March 14, 2017.
Neurology Journal now includes Falcon Scientific Editing in its Professio...
Useful Links
Academic Editing | Thesis Editing | Editing Certificate | Resources
![dissertation and ethics Tritonia](https://libapps-eu.s3.amazonaws.com/customers/1258/images/tritonia_logo.png)
Responsible Thesis-Writing Process
- Information searching
- Research data management
- Interview and Survey Data
Scientific ethics and research ethics
Research misconduct.
- Research notification
- Research permission
- Business collaboration
- Accessibility
- Publishing thesis
- Save in Osuva
- More useful information
Scientific ethics is defined as commitment to the ideals of science: integrity, openness and critical inquiry. Every member of the scientific community, from the student beginning their Bachelor’s thesis to the world famous academic, follows the same rules and guidelines of ethical scientific practice.
The ethics of science is not new, and it is not based on vague, obscure principles. The demands of scientific ethics are these common values: truth, credibility and integrity. As in human society, so in the ethics of science, it is forbidden to steal, lie or cheat.
Ethical ideals have very little meaning unless they are cherished and promoted. Their implementation must be safeguarded, and any infraction must be investigated. In Finland, the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity (TENK) has drawn up a guide for research ethics called Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland (2012). This guide was created in collaboration with the scientific community, including feedback and comments from several universities.
Research ethics is not primarily about avoiding ethical infractions. Rather, research ethics promotes commitment to procedures and practices that enable a high level of reliability and quality in research.
The Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity has divided morally significant violations of the responsible conduct of research into two groups: disregard for the responsible conduct of research and research misconduct. Both violations decrease the reliability of results and may invalidate the research itself. However, violations may vary as regards their degree of severity. The researcher who disregards or is negligent of the principles of responsible research conduct may not have understood that their shortcomings are not only damaging to the quality of their work but are also morally questionable practices. In contrast, research misconduct is an intentional choice, and not accidental or due to negligence.
Violations of research ethics in all disciplines
- Plagiarism, misappropriation of research ideas, - materials, or results
- Falsification i.e. modifying or distorting research results
- Concealing significant results, especially risks
- Appropriation of the research to one or only some researchers when others have made significant contributions
- Unequal treatment of members of a research group, e.g., in dividing tasks or hiring
- Sexual harassment and racism
- Morally questionable research subjects, such as eugenics.
Literature review
- Plagiarism or improper citation of sources
- Disregard of proper citation practices
- Quotations taken out of context, misrepresentation of the source text
- Falsified sources
Research interviews
- Asking leading questions, manipulation or other forms of mistreatment of the interview subjects
- Misleading the interview subjects about the purpose of the interview
- Distorting the interview responses
- Violating the anonymity or confidentiality of the interview subjects
- Using or publishing the interviews, recordings or images without the express permission of the parties involved
Medical and biological research
- Mistreatment of lab animals
- Painful experiments
- Unnecessary experiments
Technological and scientific research
- Negligent or unprotected tests; experiments carried out without simulations or training, which pose a threat to those conducting the experiment or to outsiders. (Unacceptable risk: dangerous to all)
- Experiments which pose a risk to the researcher’s health and safety (e.g., exposure to toxins or radiation, test flights) (High risk: dangerous for researchers or experiment participants).
- Unnecessary creation of dangerous products, substance compounds or devices
- Releasing inadequately tested products, such as pharmaceutical drugs, to the market
- Potentially dangerous or risky applications of research results (e.g., nuclear power, weapons technology)
Useful links
![dissertation and ethics Link.](https://libapps-eu.s3.amazonaws.com/accounts/118856/images/uva-nuoli.png)
- << Previous: Interview and Survey Data
- Next: Research notification >>
- Last Updated: Jun 17, 2024 11:23 AM
- URL: https://uva.libguides.com/responsible-thesis
- The Open University
- Accessibility hub
- Guest user / Sign out
- Study with The Open University
My OpenLearn Profile
Personalise your OpenLearn profile, save your favourite content and get recognition for your learning
![dissertation and ethics dissertation and ethics](https://www.open.edu/ https://www.open.edu/openlearn/pluginfile.php/3802483/tool_ocwmanage/image/0/dreamstime_m_50384175.jpg)
Addressing ethical issues in your research proposal
This article explores the ethical issues that may arise in your proposed study during your doctoral research degree.
What ethical principles apply when planning and conducting research?
Research ethics are the moral principles that govern how researchers conduct their studies (Wellcome Trust, 2014). As there are elements of uncertainty and risk involved in any study, every researcher has to consider how they can uphold these ethical principles and conduct the research in a way that protects the interests and welfare of participants and other stakeholders (such as organisations).
You will need to consider the ethical issues that might arise in your proposed study. Consideration of the fundamental ethical principles that underpin all research will help you to identify the key issues and how these could be addressed. As you are probably a practitioner who wants to undertake research within your workplace, consider how your role as an ‘insider’ influences how you will conduct your study. Think about the ethical issues that might arise when you become an insider researcher (for example, relating to trust, confidentiality and anonymity).
What key ethical principles do you think will be important when planning or conducting your research, particularly as an insider? Principles that come to mind might include autonomy, respect, dignity, privacy, informed consent and confidentiality. You may also have identified principles such as competence, integrity, wellbeing, justice and non-discrimination.
Key ethical issues that you will address as an insider researcher include:
- Gaining trust
- Avoiding coercion when recruiting colleagues or other participants (such as students or service users)
- Practical challenges relating to ensuring the confidentiality and anonymity of organisations and staff or other participants.
(Heslop et al, 2018)
A fuller discussion of ethical principles is available from the British Psychological Society’s Code of Human Research Ethics (BPS, 2021).
You can also refer to guidance from the British Educational Research Association and the British Association for Applied Linguistics .
![dissertation and ethics Pebbles balance on a stone see-saw](https://www.open.edu/openlearn/pluginfile.php/3802447/tool_ocwmanage/articletext/0/dreamstime_s_51106733.jpg)
Ethical principles are essential for protecting the interests of research participants, including maximising the benefits and minimising any risks associated with taking part in a study. These principles describe ethical conduct which reflects the integrity of the researcher, promotes the wellbeing of participants and ensures high-quality research is conducted (Health Research Authority, 2022).
Research ethics is therefore not simply about gaining ethical approval for your study to be conducted. Research ethics relates to your moral conduct as a doctoral researcher and will apply throughout your study from design to dissemination (British Psychological Society, 2021). When you apply to undertake a doctorate, you will need to clearly indicate in your proposal that you understand these ethical principles and are committed to upholding them.
Where can I find ethical guidance and resources?
Professional bodies, learned societies, health and social care authorities, academic publications, Research Ethics Committees and research organisations provide a range of ethical guidance and resources. International codes such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights underpin ethical frameworks (United Nations, 1948).
You may be aware of key legislation in your own country or the country where you plan to undertake the research, including laws relating to consent, data protection and decision-making capacity, for example, the Data Protection Act, 2018 (UK). If you want to find out more about becoming an ethical researcher, check out this Open University short course: Becoming an ethical researcher: Introduction and guidance: What is a badged course? - OpenLearn - Open University
You should be able to justify the research decisions you make. Utilising these resources will guide your ethical judgements when writing your proposal and ultimately when designing and conducting your research study. The Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (British Educational Research Association, 2018) identifies the key responsibilities you will have when you conduct your research, including the range of stakeholders that you will have responsibilities to, as follows:
- to your participants (e.g. to appropriately inform them, facilitate their participation and support them)
- clients, stakeholders and sponsors
- the community of educational or health and social care researchers
- for publication and dissemination
- your wellbeing and development
The National Institute for Health and Care Research (no date) has emphasised the need to promote equality, diversity and inclusion when undertaking research, particularly to address long-standing social and health inequalities. Research should be informed by the diversity of people’s experiences and insights, so that it will lead to the development of practice that addresses genuine need. A commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion aims to eradicate prejudice and discrimination on the basis of an individual or group of individuals' protected characteristics such as sex (gender), disability, race, sexual orientation, in line with the Equality Act 2010.
The NIHR has produced guidance for enhancing the inclusion of ‘under-served groups’ when designing a research study (2020). Although the guidance refers to clinical research it is relevant to research more broadly.
You should consider how you will promote equality and diversity in your planned study, including through aspects such as your research topic or question, the methodology you will use, the participants you plan to recruit and how you will analyse and interpret your data.
What ethical issues do I need to consider when writing my research proposal?
![dissertation and ethics Camera equipment set up filming a man talking](https://www.open.edu/openlearn/pluginfile.php/3802447/tool_ocwmanage/articletext/0/dreamstime_s_42631221.jpg)
You might be planning to undertake research in a health, social care, educational or other setting, including observations and interviews. The following prompts should help you to identify key ethical issues that you need to bear in mind when undertaking research in such settings.
1. Imagine you are a potential participant. Think about the questions and concerns that you might have:
- How would you feel if a researcher sat in your space and took notes, completed a checklist, or made an audio or film recording?
- What harm might a researcher cause by observing or interviewing you and others?
- What would you want to know about the researcher and ask them about the study before giving consent?
- When imagining you are the participant, how could the researcher make you feel more comfortable to be observed or interviewed?
2. Having considered the perspective of your potential participant, how would you take account of concerns such as privacy, consent, wellbeing and power in your research proposal?
[Adapted from OpenLearn course: Becoming an ethical researcher, Week 2 Activity 3: Becoming an ethical researcher - OpenLearn - Open University ]
The ethical issues to be considered will vary depending on your organisational context/role, the types of participants you plan to recruit (for example, children, adults with mental health problems), the research methods you will use, and the types of data you will collect. You will need to decide how to recruit your participants so you do not inappropriately exclude anyone. Consider what methods may be necessary to facilitate their voice and how you can obtain their consent to taking part or ensure that consent is obtained from someone else as necessary, for example, a parent in the case of a child.
You should also think about how to avoid imposing an unnecessary burden or costs on your participants. For example, by minimising the length of time they will have to commit to the study and by providing travel or other expenses. Identify the measures that you will take to store your participants’ data safely and maintain their confidentiality and anonymity when you report your findings. You could do this by storing interview and video recordings in a secure server and anonymising their names and those of their organisations using pseudonyms.
Professional codes such as the Code of Human Research Ethics (BPS, 2021) provide guidance on undertaking research with children. Being an ‘insider’ researching within your own organisation has advantages. However, you should also consider how this might impact on your research, such as power dynamics, consent, potential bias and any conflict of interest between your professional and researcher roles (Sapiro and Matthews, 2020).
How have other researchers addressed any ethical challenges?
The literature provides researchers’ accounts explaining how they addressed ethical challenges when undertaking studies. For example, Turcotte-Tremblay and McSween-Cadieux (2018) discuss strategies for protecting participants’ confidentiality when disseminating findings locally, such as undertaking fieldwork in multiple sites and providing findings in a generalised form. In addition, professional guidance includes case studies illustrating how ethical issues can be addressed, including when researching online forums (British Sociological Association, no date).
Watch the videos below and consider what insights the postgraduate researcher and supervisor provide regarding issues such as being an ‘insider researcher’, power relations, avoiding intrusion, maintaining participant anonymity and complying with research ethics and professional standards. How might their experiences inform the design and conduct of your own study?
Postgraduate researcher and supervisor talk about ethical considerations
Your thoughtful consideration of the ethical issues that might arise and how you would address these should enable you to propose an ethically informed study and conduct it in a responsible, fair and sensitive manner.
British Educational Research Association (2018) Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. Available at: https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018 (Accessed: 9 June 2023).
British Psychological Society (2021) Code of Human Research Ethics . Available at: https://cms.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-06/BPS%20Code%20of%20Human%20Research%20Ethics%20%281%29.pdf (Accessed: 9 June 2023).
British Sociological Association (2016) Researching online forums . Available at: https://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/24834/j000208_researching_online_forums_-cs1-_v3.pdf (Accessed: 9 June 2023).
Health Research Authority (2022) UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research . Available at: https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/policies-standards-legislation/uk-policy-framework-health-social-care-research/uk-policy-framework-health-and-social-care-research/#chiefinvestigators (Accessed: 9 June 2023).
Heslop, C., Burns, S., Lobo, R. (2018) ‘Managing qualitative research as insider-research in small rural communities’, Rural and Remote Health , 18: pp. 4576.
Equality Act 2010, c. 15. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/introduction (Accessed: 9 June 2023).
National Institute for Health and Care Research (no date) Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) . Available at: https://arc-kss.nihr.ac.uk/public-and-community-involvement/pcie-guide/how-to-do-pcie/equality-diversity-and-inclusion-edi (Accessed: 9 June 2023).
National Institute for Health and Care Research (2020) Improving inclusion of under-served groups in clinical research: Guidance from INCLUDE project. Available at: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/improving-inclusion-of-under-served-groups-in-clinical-research-guidance-from-include-project/25435 (Accessed: 9 June 2023).
Sapiro, B. and Matthews, E. (2020) ‘Both Insider and Outsider. On Conducting Social Work Research in Mental Health Settings’, Advances in Social Work , 20(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.18060/23926
Turcotte-Tremblay, A. and McSween-Cadieux, E. (2018) ‘A reflection on the challenge of protecting confidentiality of participants when disseminating research results locally’, BMC Medical Ethics, 19(supplement 1), no. 45. Available at: https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-018-0279-0
United Nations General Assembly (1948) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights . Resolution A/RES/217/A. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights#:~:text=Drafted%20by%20representatives%20with%20different,all%20peoples%20and%20all%20nations . (Accessed: 9 June 2023).
Wellcome Trust (2014) Ensuring your research is ethical: A guide for Extended Project Qualification students . Available at: https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/wtp057673_0.pdf (Accessed: 9 June 2023).
More articles from the research proposal collection
![dissertation and ethics Writing your research proposal](https://www.open.edu/openlearn/pluginfile.php/3802101/tool_ocwmanage/image/0/pexels-rfstudio-3059747.jpg)
Writing your research proposal
A doctoral research degree is the highest academic qualification that a student can achieve. The guidance provided in these articles will help you apply for one of the two main types of research degree offered by The Open University.
Level: 1 Introductory
![dissertation and ethics Defining your research methodology](https://www.open.edu/openlearn/pluginfile.php/3802418/tool_ocwmanage/image/0/digital-marketing-1433427_1280.jpg)
Defining your research methodology
Your research methodology is the approach you will take to guide your research process and explain why you use particular methods. This article explains more.
![dissertation and ethics Writing your proposal and preparing for your interview](https://www.open.edu/openlearn/pluginfile.php/3802529/tool_ocwmanage/image/0/dreamstime_m_133038259.jpg)
Writing your proposal and preparing for your interview
The final article looks at writing your research proposal - from the introduction through to citations and referencing - as well as preparing for your interview.
Free courses on postgraduate study
![dissertation and ethics Are you ready for postgraduate study?](https://www.open.edu/openlearn/pluginfile.php/1232535/tool_ocwmanage/image/0/pgas_1_OLHP_786x400.jpg)
Are you ready for postgraduate study?
This free course, Are you ready for postgraduate study, will help you to become familiar with the requirements and demands of postgraduate study and ensure you are ready to develop the skills and confidence to pursue your learning further.
![dissertation and ethics Succeeding in postgraduate study](https://www.open.edu/openlearn/pluginfile.php/863143/tool_ocwmanage/image/0/SPS1_OLHP_786x400.jpg)
Succeeding in postgraduate study
This free course, Succeeding in postgraduate study, will help you to become familiar with the requirements and demands of postgraduate study and to develop the skills and confidence to pursue your learning further.
![dissertation and ethics Applying to study for a PhD in psychology](https://www.open.edu/openlearn/pluginfile.php/3168215/tool_ocwmanage/image/0/phd_1_OLHP_786x400.jpg)
Applying to study for a PhD in psychology
This free OpenLearn course is for psychology students and graduates who are interested in PhD study at some future point. Even if you have met PhD students and heard about their projects, it is likely that you have only a vague idea of what PhD study entails. This course is intended to give you more information.
Become an OU student
Ratings & comments, share this free course, copyright information, publication details.
- Originally published: Tuesday, 27 June 2023
- Body text - Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 : The Open University
- Image 'Pebbles balance on a stone see-saw' - Copyright: Photo 51106733 / Balance © Anatoli Styf | Dreamstime.com
- Image 'Camera equipment set up filming a man talking' - Copyright: Photo 42631221 © Gabriel Robledo | Dreamstime.com
- Image 'Applying to study for a PhD in psychology' - Copyright free
- Image 'Succeeding in postgraduate study' - Copyright: © Everste/Getty Images
- Image 'Addressing ethical issues in your research proposal' - Copyright: Photo 50384175 / Children Playing © Lenutaidi | Dreamstime.com
- Image 'Writing your proposal and preparing for your interview' - Copyright: Photo 133038259 / Black Student © Fizkes | Dreamstime.com
- Image 'Defining your research methodology' - Copyright free
- Image 'Writing your research proposal' - Copyright free
- Image 'Are you ready for postgraduate study?' - Copyright free
Rate and Review
Rate this article, review this article.
Log into OpenLearn to leave reviews and join in the conversation.
Article reviews
For further information, take a look at our frequently asked questions which may give you the support you need.
- Search Menu
Sign in through your institution
- Browse content in Arts and Humanities
- Browse content in Archaeology
- Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Archaeology
- Archaeological Methodology and Techniques
- Archaeology by Region
- Archaeology of Religion
- Archaeology of Trade and Exchange
- Biblical Archaeology
- Contemporary and Public Archaeology
- Environmental Archaeology
- Historical Archaeology
- History and Theory of Archaeology
- Industrial Archaeology
- Landscape Archaeology
- Mortuary Archaeology
- Prehistoric Archaeology
- Underwater Archaeology
- Zooarchaeology
- Browse content in Architecture
- Architectural Structure and Design
- History of Architecture
- Residential and Domestic Buildings
- Theory of Architecture
- Browse content in Art
- Art Subjects and Themes
- History of Art
- Industrial and Commercial Art
- Theory of Art
- Biographical Studies
- Byzantine Studies
- Browse content in Classical Studies
- Classical History
- Classical Philosophy
- Classical Mythology
- Classical Numismatics
- Classical Literature
- Classical Reception
- Classical Art and Architecture
- Classical Oratory and Rhetoric
- Greek and Roman Epigraphy
- Greek and Roman Law
- Greek and Roman Papyrology
- Greek and Roman Archaeology
- Late Antiquity
- Religion in the Ancient World
- Social History
- Digital Humanities
- Browse content in History
- Colonialism and Imperialism
- Diplomatic History
- Environmental History
- Genealogy, Heraldry, Names, and Honours
- Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing
- Historical Geography
- History by Period
- History of Emotions
- History of Agriculture
- History of Education
- History of Gender and Sexuality
- Industrial History
- Intellectual History
- International History
- Labour History
- Legal and Constitutional History
- Local and Family History
- Maritime History
- Military History
- National Liberation and Post-Colonialism
- Oral History
- Political History
- Public History
- Regional and National History
- Revolutions and Rebellions
- Slavery and Abolition of Slavery
- Social and Cultural History
- Theory, Methods, and Historiography
- Urban History
- World History
- Browse content in Language Teaching and Learning
- Language Learning (Specific Skills)
- Language Teaching Theory and Methods
- Browse content in Linguistics
- Applied Linguistics
- Cognitive Linguistics
- Computational Linguistics
- Forensic Linguistics
- Grammar, Syntax and Morphology
- Historical and Diachronic Linguistics
- History of English
- Language Acquisition
- Language Evolution
- Language Reference
- Language Variation
- Language Families
- Lexicography
- Linguistic Anthropology
- Linguistic Theories
- Linguistic Typology
- Phonetics and Phonology
- Psycholinguistics
- Sociolinguistics
- Translation and Interpretation
- Writing Systems
- Browse content in Literature
- Bibliography
- Children's Literature Studies
- Literary Studies (Asian)
- Literary Studies (European)
- Literary Studies (Eco-criticism)
- Literary Studies (Romanticism)
- Literary Studies (American)
- Literary Studies (Modernism)
- Literary Studies - World
- Literary Studies (1500 to 1800)
- Literary Studies (19th Century)
- Literary Studies (20th Century onwards)
- Literary Studies (African American Literature)
- Literary Studies (British and Irish)
- Literary Studies (Early and Medieval)
- Literary Studies (Fiction, Novelists, and Prose Writers)
- Literary Studies (Gender Studies)
- Literary Studies (Graphic Novels)
- Literary Studies (History of the Book)
- Literary Studies (Plays and Playwrights)
- Literary Studies (Poetry and Poets)
- Literary Studies (Postcolonial Literature)
- Literary Studies (Queer Studies)
- Literary Studies (Science Fiction)
- Literary Studies (Travel Literature)
- Literary Studies (War Literature)
- Literary Studies (Women's Writing)
- Literary Theory and Cultural Studies
- Mythology and Folklore
- Shakespeare Studies and Criticism
- Browse content in Media Studies
- Browse content in Music
- Applied Music
- Dance and Music
- Ethics in Music
- Ethnomusicology
- Gender and Sexuality in Music
- Medicine and Music
- Music Cultures
- Music and Religion
- Music and Media
- Music and Culture
- Music Education and Pedagogy
- Music Theory and Analysis
- Musical Scores, Lyrics, and Libretti
- Musical Structures, Styles, and Techniques
- Musicology and Music History
- Performance Practice and Studies
- Race and Ethnicity in Music
- Sound Studies
- Browse content in Performing Arts
- Browse content in Philosophy
- Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art
- Epistemology
- Feminist Philosophy
- History of Western Philosophy
- Metaphysics
- Moral Philosophy
- Non-Western Philosophy
- Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Language
- Philosophy of Mind
- Philosophy of Perception
- Philosophy of Action
- Philosophy of Law
- Philosophy of Religion
- Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic
- Practical Ethics
- Social and Political Philosophy
- Browse content in Religion
- Biblical Studies
- Christianity
- East Asian Religions
- History of Religion
- Judaism and Jewish Studies
- Qumran Studies
- Religion and Education
- Religion and Health
- Religion and Politics
- Religion and Science
- Religion and Law
- Religion and Art, Literature, and Music
- Religious Studies
- Browse content in Society and Culture
- Cookery, Food, and Drink
- Cultural Studies
- Customs and Traditions
- Ethical Issues and Debates
- Hobbies, Games, Arts and Crafts
- Natural world, Country Life, and Pets
- Popular Beliefs and Controversial Knowledge
- Sports and Outdoor Recreation
- Technology and Society
- Travel and Holiday
- Visual Culture
- Browse content in Law
- Arbitration
- Browse content in Company and Commercial Law
- Commercial Law
- Company Law
- Browse content in Comparative Law
- Systems of Law
- Competition Law
- Browse content in Constitutional and Administrative Law
- Government Powers
- Judicial Review
- Local Government Law
- Military and Defence Law
- Parliamentary and Legislative Practice
- Construction Law
- Contract Law
- Browse content in Criminal Law
- Criminal Procedure
- Criminal Evidence Law
- Sentencing and Punishment
- Employment and Labour Law
- Environment and Energy Law
- Browse content in Financial Law
- Banking Law
- Insolvency Law
- History of Law
- Human Rights and Immigration
- Intellectual Property Law
- Browse content in International Law
- Private International Law and Conflict of Laws
- Public International Law
- IT and Communications Law
- Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law
- Law and Politics
- Law and Society
- Browse content in Legal System and Practice
- Courts and Procedure
- Legal Skills and Practice
- Primary Sources of Law
- Regulation of Legal Profession
- Medical and Healthcare Law
- Browse content in Policing
- Criminal Investigation and Detection
- Police and Security Services
- Police Procedure and Law
- Police Regional Planning
- Browse content in Property Law
- Personal Property Law
- Study and Revision
- Terrorism and National Security Law
- Browse content in Trusts Law
- Wills and Probate or Succession
- Browse content in Medicine and Health
- Browse content in Allied Health Professions
- Arts Therapies
- Clinical Science
- Dietetics and Nutrition
- Occupational Therapy
- Operating Department Practice
- Physiotherapy
- Radiography
- Speech and Language Therapy
- Browse content in Anaesthetics
- General Anaesthesia
- Neuroanaesthesia
- Browse content in Clinical Medicine
- Acute Medicine
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Genetics
- Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
- Dermatology
- Endocrinology and Diabetes
- Gastroenterology
- Genito-urinary Medicine
- Geriatric Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Toxicology
- Medical Oncology
- Pain Medicine
- Palliative Medicine
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Respiratory Medicine and Pulmonology
- Rheumatology
- Sleep Medicine
- Sports and Exercise Medicine
- Clinical Neuroscience
- Community Medical Services
- Critical Care
- Emergency Medicine
- Forensic Medicine
- Haematology
- History of Medicine
- Browse content in Medical Dentistry
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Paediatric Dentistry
- Restorative Dentistry and Orthodontics
- Surgical Dentistry
- Browse content in Medical Skills
- Clinical Skills
- Communication Skills
- Nursing Skills
- Surgical Skills
- Medical Ethics
- Medical Statistics and Methodology
- Browse content in Neurology
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Neuropathology
- Nursing Studies
- Browse content in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Gynaecology
- Occupational Medicine
- Ophthalmology
- Otolaryngology (ENT)
- Browse content in Paediatrics
- Neonatology
- Browse content in Pathology
- Chemical Pathology
- Clinical Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics
- Histopathology
- Medical Microbiology and Virology
- Patient Education and Information
- Browse content in Pharmacology
- Psychopharmacology
- Browse content in Popular Health
- Caring for Others
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine
- Self-help and Personal Development
- Browse content in Preclinical Medicine
- Cell Biology
- Molecular Biology and Genetics
- Reproduction, Growth and Development
- Primary Care
- Professional Development in Medicine
- Browse content in Psychiatry
- Addiction Medicine
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
- Forensic Psychiatry
- Learning Disabilities
- Old Age Psychiatry
- Psychotherapy
- Browse content in Public Health and Epidemiology
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
- Browse content in Radiology
- Clinical Radiology
- Interventional Radiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Radiation Oncology
- Reproductive Medicine
- Browse content in Surgery
- Cardiothoracic Surgery
- Gastro-intestinal and Colorectal Surgery
- General Surgery
- Neurosurgery
- Paediatric Surgery
- Peri-operative Care
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Surgical Oncology
- Transplant Surgery
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Browse content in Science and Mathematics
- Browse content in Biological Sciences
- Aquatic Biology
- Biochemistry
- Bioinformatics and Computational Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology and Conservation
- Evolutionary Biology
- Genetics and Genomics
- Microbiology
- Molecular and Cell Biology
- Natural History
- Plant Sciences and Forestry
- Research Methods in Life Sciences
- Structural Biology
- Systems Biology
- Zoology and Animal Sciences
- Browse content in Chemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
- Computational Chemistry
- Crystallography
- Environmental Chemistry
- Industrial Chemistry
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Materials Chemistry
- Medicinal Chemistry
- Mineralogy and Gems
- Organic Chemistry
- Physical Chemistry
- Polymer Chemistry
- Study and Communication Skills in Chemistry
- Theoretical Chemistry
- Browse content in Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Architecture and Logic Design
- Game Studies
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Mathematical Theory of Computation
- Programming Languages
- Software Engineering
- Systems Analysis and Design
- Virtual Reality
- Browse content in Computing
- Business Applications
- Computer Security
- Computer Games
- Computer Networking and Communications
- Digital Lifestyle
- Graphical and Digital Media Applications
- Operating Systems
- Browse content in Earth Sciences and Geography
- Atmospheric Sciences
- Environmental Geography
- Geology and the Lithosphere
- Maps and Map-making
- Meteorology and Climatology
- Oceanography and Hydrology
- Palaeontology
- Physical Geography and Topography
- Regional Geography
- Soil Science
- Urban Geography
- Browse content in Engineering and Technology
- Agriculture and Farming
- Biological Engineering
- Civil Engineering, Surveying, and Building
- Electronics and Communications Engineering
- Energy Technology
- Engineering (General)
- Environmental Science, Engineering, and Technology
- History of Engineering and Technology
- Mechanical Engineering and Materials
- Technology of Industrial Chemistry
- Transport Technology and Trades
- Browse content in Environmental Science
- Applied Ecology (Environmental Science)
- Conservation of the Environment (Environmental Science)
- Environmental Sustainability
- Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Environmental Science)
- Management of Land and Natural Resources (Environmental Science)
- Natural Disasters (Environmental Science)
- Nuclear Issues (Environmental Science)
- Pollution and Threats to the Environment (Environmental Science)
- Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Environmental Science)
- History of Science and Technology
- Browse content in Materials Science
- Ceramics and Glasses
- Composite Materials
- Metals, Alloying, and Corrosion
- Nanotechnology
- Browse content in Mathematics
- Applied Mathematics
- Biomathematics and Statistics
- History of Mathematics
- Mathematical Education
- Mathematical Finance
- Mathematical Analysis
- Numerical and Computational Mathematics
- Probability and Statistics
- Pure Mathematics
- Browse content in Neuroscience
- Cognition and Behavioural Neuroscience
- Development of the Nervous System
- Disorders of the Nervous System
- History of Neuroscience
- Invertebrate Neurobiology
- Molecular and Cellular Systems
- Neuroendocrinology and Autonomic Nervous System
- Neuroscientific Techniques
- Sensory and Motor Systems
- Browse content in Physics
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics
- Biological and Medical Physics
- Classical Mechanics
- Computational Physics
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Electromagnetism, Optics, and Acoustics
- History of Physics
- Mathematical and Statistical Physics
- Measurement Science
- Nuclear Physics
- Particles and Fields
- Plasma Physics
- Quantum Physics
- Relativity and Gravitation
- Semiconductor and Mesoscopic Physics
- Browse content in Psychology
- Affective Sciences
- Clinical Psychology
- Cognitive Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Criminal and Forensic Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Educational Psychology
- Evolutionary Psychology
- Health Psychology
- History and Systems in Psychology
- Music Psychology
- Neuropsychology
- Organizational Psychology
- Psychological Assessment and Testing
- Psychology of Human-Technology Interaction
- Psychology Professional Development and Training
- Research Methods in Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Browse content in Social Sciences
- Browse content in Anthropology
- Anthropology of Religion
- Human Evolution
- Medical Anthropology
- Physical Anthropology
- Regional Anthropology
- Social and Cultural Anthropology
- Theory and Practice of Anthropology
- Browse content in Business and Management
- Business Strategy
- Business Ethics
- Business History
- Business and Government
- Business and Technology
- Business and the Environment
- Comparative Management
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Entrepreneurship
- Health Management
- Human Resource Management
- Industrial and Employment Relations
- Industry Studies
- Information and Communication Technologies
- International Business
- Knowledge Management
- Management and Management Techniques
- Operations Management
- Organizational Theory and Behaviour
- Pensions and Pension Management
- Public and Nonprofit Management
- Social Issues in Business and Management
- Strategic Management
- Supply Chain Management
- Browse content in Criminology and Criminal Justice
- Criminal Justice
- Criminology
- Forms of Crime
- International and Comparative Criminology
- Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice
- Development Studies
- Browse content in Economics
- Agricultural, Environmental, and Natural Resource Economics
- Asian Economics
- Behavioural Finance
- Behavioural Economics and Neuroeconomics
- Econometrics and Mathematical Economics
- Economic Systems
- Economic History
- Economic Methodology
- Economic Development and Growth
- Financial Markets
- Financial Institutions and Services
- General Economics and Teaching
- Health, Education, and Welfare
- History of Economic Thought
- International Economics
- Labour and Demographic Economics
- Law and Economics
- Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics
- Microeconomics
- Public Economics
- Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
- Welfare Economics
- Browse content in Education
- Adult Education and Continuous Learning
- Care and Counselling of Students
- Early Childhood and Elementary Education
- Educational Equipment and Technology
- Educational Strategies and Policy
- Higher and Further Education
- Organization and Management of Education
- Philosophy and Theory of Education
- Schools Studies
- Secondary Education
- Teaching of a Specific Subject
- Teaching of Specific Groups and Special Educational Needs
- Teaching Skills and Techniques
- Browse content in Environment
- Applied Ecology (Social Science)
- Climate Change
- Conservation of the Environment (Social Science)
- Environmentalist Thought and Ideology (Social Science)
- Management of Land and Natural Resources (Social Science)
- Natural Disasters (Environment)
- Social Impact of Environmental Issues (Social Science)
- Sustainability
- Browse content in Human Geography
- Cultural Geography
- Economic Geography
- Political Geography
- Browse content in Interdisciplinary Studies
- Communication Studies
- Museums, Libraries, and Information Sciences
- Browse content in Politics
- African Politics
- Asian Politics
- Chinese Politics
- Comparative Politics
- Conflict Politics
- Elections and Electoral Studies
- Environmental Politics
- Ethnic Politics
- European Union
- Foreign Policy
- Gender and Politics
- Human Rights and Politics
- Indian Politics
- International Relations
- International Organization (Politics)
- International Political Economy
- Irish Politics
- Latin American Politics
- Middle Eastern Politics
- Political Methodology
- Political Communication
- Political Philosophy
- Political Sociology
- Political Behaviour
- Political Economy
- Political Institutions
- Political Theory
- Politics and Law
- Politics of Development
- Public Administration
- Public Policy
- Qualitative Political Methodology
- Quantitative Political Methodology
- Regional Political Studies
- Russian Politics
- Security Studies
- State and Local Government
- UK Politics
- US Politics
- Browse content in Regional and Area Studies
- African Studies
- Asian Studies
- East Asian Studies
- Japanese Studies
- Latin American Studies
- Middle Eastern Studies
- Native American Studies
- Scottish Studies
- Browse content in Research and Information
- Research Methods
- Browse content in Social Work
- Addictions and Substance Misuse
- Adoption and Fostering
- Care of the Elderly
- Child and Adolescent Social Work
- Couple and Family Social Work
- Direct Practice and Clinical Social Work
- Emergency Services
- Human Behaviour and the Social Environment
- International and Global Issues in Social Work
- Mental and Behavioural Health
- Social Justice and Human Rights
- Social Policy and Advocacy
- Social Work and Crime and Justice
- Social Work Macro Practice
- Social Work Practice Settings
- Social Work Research and Evidence-based Practice
- Welfare and Benefit Systems
- Browse content in Sociology
- Childhood Studies
- Community Development
- Comparative and Historical Sociology
- Economic Sociology
- Gender and Sexuality
- Gerontology and Ageing
- Health, Illness, and Medicine
- Marriage and the Family
- Migration Studies
- Occupations, Professions, and Work
- Organizations
- Population and Demography
- Race and Ethnicity
- Social Theory
- Social Movements and Social Change
- Social Research and Statistics
- Social Stratification, Inequality, and Mobility
- Sociology of Religion
- Sociology of Education
- Sport and Leisure
- Urban and Rural Studies
- Browse content in Warfare and Defence
- Defence Strategy, Planning, and Research
- Land Forces and Warfare
- Military Administration
- Military Life and Institutions
- Naval Forces and Warfare
- Other Warfare and Defence Issues
- Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution
- Weapons and Equipment
![dissertation and ethics The Dissertation: From Beginning to End](https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/UI/app/img/generic-cover.png)
- < Previous chapter
- Next chapter >
4 Chapter 4 Ethics and Research Methodology
- Published: December 2009
- Cite Icon Cite
- Permissions Icon Permissions
This chapter describes ethical issues in social research including discussion of the NASW Code of Ethics, Institutional Review Board (IRB) processes, and requirements for the protection of human subjects. In addition, quantitative research methods; qualitative research methods; mixed-methods research designs; experimental, quasi-experimental, explanatory, exploratory, and descriptive research; program evaluation; and the relative merits of disparate models of research are also presented. The requirements of rigor in both quantitative and qualitative studies and evaluating the degree of fit between research strategies and problems under investigation are also discussed.
Personal account
- Sign in with email/username & password
- Get email alerts
- Save searches
- Purchase content
- Activate your purchase/trial code
- Add your ORCID iD
Institutional access
Sign in with a library card.
- Sign in with username/password
- Recommend to your librarian
- Institutional account management
- Get help with access
Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:
IP based access
Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.
Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth/Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.
- Click Sign in through your institution.
- Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
- When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
- Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.
If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.
Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.
Society Members
Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:
Sign in through society site
Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:
- Click Sign in through society site.
- When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.
Sign in using a personal account
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.
A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.
Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.
Viewing your signed in accounts
Click the account icon in the top right to:
- View your signed in personal account and access account management features.
- View the institutional accounts that are providing access.
Signed in but can't access content
Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.
For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.
Our books are available by subscription or purchase to libraries and institutions.
Month: | Total Views: |
---|---|
October 2022 | 14 |
November 2022 | 6 |
December 2022 | 8 |
January 2023 | 10 |
February 2023 | 7 |
March 2023 | 4 |
April 2023 | 12 |
May 2023 | 2 |
June 2023 | 14 |
July 2023 | 3 |
August 2023 | 2 |
September 2023 | 6 |
October 2023 | 1 |
November 2023 | 1 |
December 2023 | 3 |
January 2024 | 11 |
February 2024 | 5 |
March 2024 | 5 |
April 2024 | 5 |
May 2024 | 9 |
June 2024 | 3 |
July 2024 | 6 |
- About Oxford Academic
- Publish journals with us
- University press partners
- What we publish
- New features
- Open access
- Rights and permissions
- Accessibility
- Advertising
- Media enquiries
- Oxford University Press
- Oxford Languages
- University of Oxford
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide
- Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
- Cookie settings
- Cookie policy
- Privacy policy
- Legal notice
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only
For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.
Log in using your username and password
- Search More Search for this keyword Advanced search
- Latest content
- Current issue
- JME Commentaries
- BMJ Journals
You are here
- Volume 36, Issue 7
- Research ethics in dissertations: ethical issues and complexity of reasoning
- Article Text
- Article info
- Citation Tools
- Rapid Responses
- Article metrics
![dissertation and ethics Download PDF](https://jme.bmj.com/sites/default/themes/bmjj/img/icon-pdf.png)
- S Kjellström 1 ,
- S N Ross 2 , 3 ,
- B Fridlund 4
- 1 Institute of Gerontology, School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
- 2 Antioch University Midwest, Yellow Springs, Ohio, USA
- 3 ARINA, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- 4 Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
- Correspondence to Sofia Kjellström, Institute of Gerontology, School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, PO Box 1026, SE-551 11 Jönköping, Sweden; sofia.kjellstrom{at}hhj.hj.se
Background Conducting ethically sound research is a fundamental principle of scientific inquiry. Recent research has indicated that ethical concerns are insufficiently dealt with in dissertations.
Purpose To examine which research ethical topics were addressed and how these were presented in terms of complexity of reasoning in Swedish nurses' dissertations.
Methods Analyses of ethical content and complexity of ethical reasoning were performed on 64 Swedish nurses' PhD dissertations dated 2007.
Results A total of seven ethical topics were identified: ethical approval (94% of the dissertations), information and informed consent (86%), confidentiality (67%), ethical aspects of methods (61%), use of ethical principles and regulations (39%), rationale for the study (20%) and fair participant selection (14%). Four of those of topics were most frequently addressed: the majority of dissertations (72%) included 3–5 issues. While many ethical concerns, by their nature, involve systematic concepts or metasystematic principles, ethical reasoning scored predominantly at lesser levels of complexity: abstract (6% of the dissertations), formal (84%) and systematic (10%).
Conclusions Research ethics are inadequately covered in most dissertations by nurses in Sweden. Important ethical concerns are missing, and the complexity of reasoning on ethical principles, motives and implications is insufficient. This is partly due to traditions and norms that discount ethical concerns but is probably also a reflection of the ability of PhD students and supervisors to handle complexity in general. It is suggested that the importance of ethical considerations should be emphasised in graduate and post-graduate studies and that individuals with capacity to deal with systematic and metasystematic concepts are recruited to senior research positions.
- Research ethics
- human development
- dissertation
- graduate education
- applied and professional ethics
- scientific research
https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2009.034561
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request permissions.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you.
- 3D bioprint me: a socioethical view of bioprinting human organs and tissues Niki Vermeulen et al., Journal of Medical Ethics, 2017
- Towards a European code of medical ethics. Ethical and legal issues Sara Patuzzo et al., Journal of Medical Ethics, 2016
- Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol Val Thurtle et al., BMJ Open, 2021
- Ethical navigation of biobanking establishment in Ukraine: learning from the experience of developing countries Oksana N Sulaieva et al., Journal of Medical Ethics, 2023
- A comparative analysis of biomedical research ethics regulation systems in Europe and Latin America with regard to the protection of human subjects Eugenia Lamas et al., Journal of Medical Ethics, 2010
- Understanding ethics guidelines using an internet-based expert system G Shankar et al., Journal of Medical Ethics, 2008
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees L Elliott et al., Journal of Medical Ethics, 2008
- Beyond regulatory approaches to ethics: making space for ethical preparedness in healthcare research Kate Lyle et al., Journal of Medical Ethics, 2022
- Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues D Hunter, Journal of Medical Ethics, 2007
- How not to argue against mandatory ethics review David Hunter, Journal of Medical Ethics, 2012
![dissertation and ethics York University](https://www.yorku.ca/gradstudies/wp-content/themes/york2020/images/yorku-logo.jpg)
Research Ethics
York University is committed to the highest standards of integrity in research. All projects involving the use of Human Subjects , Animals and Biohazardous Materials are subject to review by the appropriate University committee. York University has formulated policies for the conduct of research involving all three of these areas. It is the policy of the University that researchers conducting research involving human subjects , animals and/or biohazardous agents must obtain approval of their research from the relevant ethics committee prior to commencing research activities.
The Faculty of Graduate Studies is governed by the Senate Policy on Research Involving Human Participants . The Senate Policy states that all University-based research involving human participants, whether funded or non-funded, faculty or student, scholarly, commercial or consultative, is subject to the ethics review process.
Graduate students undertaking research for graduate courses, major research papers, theses, or dissertations involving human participants are required to follow the appropriate procedures and obtain ethics approval before conducting research activities . Students also must maintain active registration status while conducting the approved research. The information below outlines the ethics protocols and procedures for each category of research.
- Theses, Dissertations and Pilot Projects
- Graduate Courses and Major Research Papers (MRPs)
Please carefully review the procedures that are relevant to your project, and ensure that you complete and submit all of the required documents along with your research proposal to your graduate program. Incomplete or illegible protocols will be returned to the student, which will delay the process. If you have further questions about research ethics review processes, consult Decision Chart- Full Board and Delegated Ethics Review Processes .
Graduate Student Risk Assessment
The Graduate Student Risk Assessment Guidelines of the Faculty of Graduate Studies (FGS) serve to assist graduate students in identifying appropriate health and safety considerations and preventative efforts prior to departing for field activities. In concert with the Graduate Student Risk Assessment Form, Undertaking, Release and Checklist , graduate students should review these guidelines with their faculty supervisor. Assessing risk is a critical step in determining necessary hazard controls and other mitigation required for specific research activities.
Please visit Graduate Student Risk Assessment for more information including applicable forms.
Quick Links
- Academic Important Dates
- Registration & Enrolment
- How to Apply
- Graduate Supervision
- Academic Petitions
- Book a Wellness Consultation
- 2024 Academic Remediation
Theses, Dissertations and Pilot Projects Involving Human Participants
Graduate students conducting research for the purposes of completing a graduate thesis or dissertation are subject to review by a delegated ethics review committee comprised of the Associate Dean(s), Research, Faculty of Graduate Studies and the Chair/Vice-Chair HPRC. Where delegated reviewers decide that a protocol should not be approved, the protocol will be referred to the HPRC for full board review.
All graduate student researchers must complete the TCPS tutorial to establish that they have completed the necessary education component and attach their certificate of completion to their protocols. Protocols will not be accepted for review unless a valid TCPS tutorial certificate is attached.
When is Ethics Review Required
All research involving human participants is considered research subject to review. The Principal Investigator (researcher) of any research project involving human participants:
- MUST have a protocol that describes how the researcher(s) will interact with the human participants; and
- MUST have that protocol reviewed and approved by the appropriate Research Ethics Committee before the research commences; and
- MUST obtain informed consent from ALL research participants. For minor-age participants (Those under the age of 16 for minimal-risk research), both parental consent and participant assent are required.
NOTE: Failure to obtain ethics approval prior to the commencement of Research Activities is considered both a breach of Senate Policy as well as research misconduct. All such instances of non-compliance will be addressed by the appropriate institutional office. NOTE: Graduate students must be registered as active in a graduate program while conducting approved research with human participants, animals, and/or biological agents. Graduate students on leave or who have withdrawn from their graduate program with an approved research protocol on record may not conduct/continue to conduct any research with human participants, animals, and/or biological agents, until such time that their student registration status becomes active.
With an ‘inactive’ registration status, please note that your approved protocol will be marked as suspended by the Office of Research Ethics. When you are ready to return to your studies, students must petition to reinstate, and must contact the Office of Research Ethics at [email protected] , citing their protocol number, and inquire as to whether they need to reapply (if leave has been longer than a year) or if the pause can be lifted.
Graduate students are not permitted to conduct any research with human participants, animals and/or biological agents without an approved proposal by their programs and FGS and an approved ethics protocol.
Research Ethics Review and Approval: Forms and Processes
- If the research is minimum risk*: – Form TD1: Thesis/Dissertation Research Proposal – Thesis/Dissertation Proposal – Form TD2: Research Ethics Protocol Form for Graduate Student Thesis, Dissertation, or Pilot Project – Informed consent and other relevant documents described in TD2 checklist – TCPS Tutorial Certificate (*Must complete the CORE 2022 certificate released in 2022)
- If the research involves Aboriginal/Indigenous Peoples; clinical trials; or research that is more than minimum risk: – Form TD1: Thesis/Dissertation Research Proposal – Thesis/Dissertation Proposal – Human Participant Research Committee (HPRC) form – Informed consent and other relevant documents described in HPRC form – TCPS Tutorial Certificate (*Must complete the CORE 2022 certificate released in 2022)
- If the research is conducted as part of or a subset of a faculty member’s approved research project: – Form TD1: Thesis/Dissertation Research Proposal – Thesis/Dissertation Proposal – Form TD4: Statement of Relationship Between Proposal and an Existing HPRC-Approved Project – HPRC Approval Certificate for faculty’s research project – TCPS Tutorial Certificate (*Must complete the CORE 2022 certificate released in 2022)
- If the research that is based on secondary data analysis: – Form TD1: Thesis/Dissertation Research Proposal – Thesis/Dissertation Proposal – Form TD2: Research Ethics Protocol Form for Graduate Student Thesis, Dissertation, or Pilot Project – Informed consent and other relevant documents described in TD2 checklist (if applicable), Debriefing Consent Form for studies involving deception – TCPS Tutorial Certificate (*Must complete the CORE 2022 certificate released in 2022)
*For the purposes of Research Ethics Review, “minimal risk” research is defined by the TCPS as research in which the probability and magnitude of possible harms implied by participation in the research is no greater than those encountered by participants in those aspects of their everyday life that relate to the research.
*If your research involves an in-person method, please review r equired documents and steps .
NOTE: If the proposed research poses an elevated risk to yourself as the researcher requiring further health and safety considerations, you must consult the Graduate Student Risk Assessment Guidelines and complete the Graduate Student Risk Assessment Form .
- A pilot project is defined as preliminary research that is necessary in order to be able to write the thesis or dissertation proposal. Pilot projects must still include a description of research procedures and sample research instruments (e.g., survey or interview questions). Please submit TD2 form and informed consent documents .
- Secondary Data Analysis is described as the analysis of data involving human participants collected for a purpose other than that for which it was originally collected in order to pursue a research interest which is distinct from that of the original work.
- The HPRC uses the definition of minimal risk as outlined in the SSHRC/NSERC/CIHR Tri-Council Policy Statement: “Ethical Conduct for Research involving Humans” (December 2014): “‘minimal risk’ research is defined as research in which the probability and magnitude of possible harms implied by participation in the research is no greater than those encountered by participants in those aspects of their everyday life that relate to the research” (Article 2.8B). An expanded version of this definition is available from the Office of Research Ethics upon request.
- your research will be conducted on Aboriginal land (Canada; international);
- recruitment criteria will include Aboriginal identity as either a factor for the entire study or for a subgroup of the study;
- your research will seek input from participants regarding an Aboriginal community’s cultural heritage, artefacts or traditional knowledge;
- aboriginal identity or membership in an aboriginal community will be used as a variable for the purpose of analysis of the research data; or
- interpretation of research results will refer to Aboriginal communities, peoples, language, history or culture. Note: Literary criticism and/or history (excluding oral history) and/or primarily textual activities are not applicable.
- To access the HPRC form, please visit HPRC form
All research involving human participants for graduate courses and Graduate Major Research Papers (MRPs) that is non-funded, minimal-risk, does not involve Aboriginal peoples or a clinical trial must be reviewed by the relevant unit level Delegated Ethics Review Committee. Research subject to review includes, but is not limited to: surveys, questionnaires, interviews, participant observation and secondary data analysis.
NOTE: Research conducted for a course or Major Research Paper (MRP) that is more than minimal risk and /or involves Aboriginal/Indigenous peoples and/or involves clinical trials must be reviewed by the Human Participants Review Committee (HPRC). For these types of research, students are required to complete the HPRC form and submit it to the HPRC for review. Please contact the Office of Research Ethics for more information ( [email protected] )
For more information on ethics review requirements for graduate and undergraduate course-related research and MRPs, please go to, “Ethics Review Requirements" for Course-Related Research by Students.
When Is Ethics Review Required?
All research involving human participants is considered research subject to review . The Principal Investigator (researcher) of any research project involving human participants:
- MUST obtain informed consent from ALL research participants. For minor age participants (those under the age of 16 for minimal risk research), both parental consent and participant assent is required.
NOTE: Failure to obtain ethics approval prior to the commencement of Research Activities is considered both a breach of Senate Policy as well as research misconduct. All such instances of non-compliance will be addressed by the appropriate institutional office.
What Forms Do I Use and Where Do I Submit Them?
A. If you are a Graduate or Undergraduate Course Instructor:
If the students in your graduate or undergraduate course are conducting research involving human participants as part of a course assignment, the research is minimal risk and does NOT involve Aboriginal/Indigenous peoples, and all students in the class are conducting the same or similar research, then proceed as follows:
- Complete the Generic Protocol: Course Related Research Involving Human Participants
- Review the “ Course Director Responsibilities ” document
- Submit the completed Protocol Package ( Protocol form, Consent document(s) and other relevant documents ) (such as survey tools, questionnaires, recruitment materials etc) to the relevant Unit level Delegated E thics Review Committee
B. If you are an Undergraduate Student:
If you are conducting research involving human participants , as part of an undergraduate course assignment, or as an individual project (either for the class or for an undergraduate thesis), then proceed as follows:
- Complete the Individualized Protocol: Course Related Research Involving Human Participants ;
- Review the “ Student Researcher Responsibilities ” document
- Submit the completed Protocol Package ( Protocol form, Consent document(s), your completed TCPS tutorial certificate and other relevant documents ) (such as survey tools, questionnaires, recruitment materials etc) to the relevant Unit level Delegated Ethics Review Committee for review and approval.
C. If you are a Graduate Student:
- If you are conducting research involving human participants , as part of a graduate course assignment , and the research is minimal risk and does NOT involve Aboriginal/Indigenous peoples, then proceed as follows:
- Complete the Individualized Protocol: Course Related Research Involving Human Participants;
- Submit the completed Protocol Package ( Protocol form, Consent document(s), your completed TCPS tutorial certificate and other relevant documents ) (such as survey tools, questionnaires, recruitment materials etc) to the relevant Unit level Delegated Ethics Review Committee .
2. If you are conducting research involving human participants, in support of a Major Research Paper and the research is minimal risk and does NOT involve Aboriginal/Indigenous peoples, then proceed as follows:
- Complete the MRP Protocol: Research Involving Human Participants ;
- Review the “ Student Researcher Responsibilities ” document;
- Submit the MRP protocol package ( Protocol form, Consent document(s), your completed TCPS tutorial certificate and other relevant documents ) (such as survey tools, questionnaires, recruitment materials etc) to your Supervisory/Advisory Committee for approval and signature;
- Submit the signed MRP Protocol package the relevant Unit level Delegated Ethics Review Committee for review and approval.
D. Graduate Program Directors:
Annually, each Graduate Program will compile the following information for the period from June 1st to May 31 st and submit it to the Faculty of Graduate Studies:
- A listing of all courses in which research was conducted involving human participants
- A listing of the titles of MRPs involving human participants and the names of students who undertook the MRPs
- Information about the Unit level Delegated Ethics Review Committee, including the Chair, review members and administrative contact
Further information about the Delegated Ethics Review Committees (Composition, responsibilities, reporting requirements and forms) are available at the Office of Research Ethics website .
For more information, please consult the following sources:
- Research Ethics Policies & Guidelines, Office of Research Ethics
- SSHRC/NSERC/CIHR Tri-Council Policy Statement Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans
- TCPS Tutorial
- HPRC protocol * This form is to be used ONLY by those students who are conducting research involving Aboriginal/Indigenous Peoples; clinical trials; and/or research that is more than minimum risk:
- Amendment Request Form Graduate Student—Thesis or Dissertation
- Renewal Request Form Graduate Student—Thesis or Dissertation
- Faculty of Graduate Studies Ethics Review Process
Faculty of Graduate Studies: Research Officer by visiting our FGS Staff Directory .
The Office of Research Ethics (ORE): [email protected]
ORE Office Hour
The ORE will host virtual office hours (via Zoom) for students and faculty members who have questions about ethics applications for research involving human participants. Their virtual office hours will be every Wednesday between 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM . No appointment is necessary. Zoom: Join the Meeting
Connect with FGS
![dissertation and ethics Research-Methodology](https://rm-15da4.kxcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/imageedit_17_5934559984-1.png)
Ethical Considerations
Ethical Considerations can be specified as one of the most important parts of the research. Dissertations may even be doomed to failure if this part is missing.
According to Bryman and Bell (2007) [1] the following ten points represent the most important principles related to ethical considerations in dissertations:
- Research participants should not be subjected to harm in any ways whatsoever.
- Respect for the dignity of research participants should be prioritised.
- Full consent should be obtained from the participants prior to the study.
- The protection of the privacy of research participants has to be ensured.
- Adequate level of confidentiality of the research data should be ensured.
- Anonymity of individuals and organisations participating in the research has to be ensured.
- Any deception or exaggeration about the aims and objectives of the research must be avoided.
- Affiliations in any forms, sources of funding, as well as any possible conflicts of interests have to be declared.
- Any type of communication in relation to the research should be done with honesty and transparency.
- Any type of misleading information, as well as representation of primary data findings in a biased way must be avoided.
In order to address ethical considerations aspect of your dissertation in an effective manner, you will need to expand discussions of each of the following points to at least one paragraph:
1. Voluntary participation of respondents in the research is important. Moreover, participants have rights to withdraw from the study at any stage if they wish to do so.
2. Respondents should participate on the basis of informed consent. The principle of informed consent involves researchers providing sufficient information and assurances about taking part to allow individuals to understand the implications of participation and to reach a fully informed, considered and freely given decision about whether or not to do so, without the exercise of any pressure or coercion. [2]
3. The use of offensive, discriminatory, or other unacceptable language needs to be avoided in the formulation of Questionnaire/Interview/Focus group questions.
4. Privacy and anonymity or respondents is of a paramount importance.
5. Acknowledgement of works of other authors used in any part of the dissertation with the use of Harvard/APA/Vancouver referencing system according to the Dissertation Handbook
6. Maintenance of the highest level of objectivity in discussions and analyses throughout the research
7. Adherence to Data Protection Act (1998) if you are studying in the UK
In studies that do not involve primary data collection, on the other hand, ethical issues are going to be limited to the points d) and e) above.
Most universities have their own Code of Ethical Practice. It is critically important for you to thoroughly adhere to this code in every aspect of your research and declare your adherence in ethical considerations part of your dissertation.
My e-book, The Ultimate Guide to Writing a Dissertation in Business Studies: a step by step assistance offers practical assistance to complete a dissertation with minimum or no stress. The e-book covers all stages of writing a dissertation starting from the selection to the research area to submitting the completed version of the work within the deadline. John Dudovskiy
![dissertation and ethics Ethical Considerations in dissertation](https://rm-15da4.kxcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Ethical-Considerations-in-dissertation.jpg)
[1] Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2007) “Business Research Methods”, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press.
[2] Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012) “Research Methods for Business Students” 6th edition, Pearson Education Limited.
Article Categories
Book categories, collections.
- Academics & The Arts Articles
- Language & Language Arts Articles
- Writing Articles
Dissertation Ethics in a Nutshell
Writing a dissertation for dummies.
![dissertation and ethics Book image](https://www.dummies.com/wp-content/uploads/writing-a-dissertation-for-dummies-uk-edition-cover-9780470742709-169x255.jpg)
Sign up for the Dummies Beta Program to try Dummies' newest way to learn.
Social science studies (including your dissertation), are about individuals, communities and societies. Even though you’re not carrying out a case study, questionnaire or interview when doing your research for your dissertation, you’re bound to be looking at an issue that involves people – and before starting off you need to sort out any ethical matters connected with your research.
You have to make sure that the interests and rights of anyone affected by your work are safeguarded and you must ensure that you keep to the following:
Obeying the legislation on human rights and data protection
Maintaining good quality research (data collection, storage analysis, dissemination of information)
Gaining the informed consent of your subjects
Thinking through the consequences of your work
Most undergraduate dissertations are fairly straightforward because the sample group you’re researching is usually fairly small and the context is known to the supervisor and the student. This scenario (of knowing your subjects and there being minimal risk and concern) is recommended because it makes the whole process manageable and more feasible in the timescale that you’re given for your dissertation.
If your research causes you to fall into any of the following categories, you need to ask your supervisor for advice on what you should do:
Your study involves vulnerable participants and/or those unable to give informed consent (such as children or people with learning difficulties or disabilities).
Some of your subjects may be feeling under pressure to take part (friends, colleagues, family members).
Your research means discussing issues that may upset people or cause stress, such as health matters, personal experiences or something the person knows to be illegal such as drug use.
Your study involves communicating with a ‘gatekeeper’ in order for you to have access to the subjects (for example, you need to obtain the agreement of the teacher and the parents to access the children in her class).
Your participants may be taking part without their knowledge (for example, carrying out observation of children in a playground).
You may be at risk when carrying out observations or interviews.
Dissertation ethics: Check your compliance with university regulations
Universities have specific regulations about getting ethical clearance for any part of a study that may breach ethical guidelines. You’re going to have to comply with particular permissions if you’re carrying out observations or interviews.
Your university may ask you to complete a form to get ethical clearance for your research. This is the norm for higher level studies and research projects but less common for undergraduate dissertations. If you do need to fill in a form addressing ethical concerns, the questions you’re likely to be asked are:
Aim of study.
Background (naming some of the literature and other studies in a similar area).
Research methodologies and methods.
Potential problems for subjects (such as discussing sensitive issues).
Potential problems for the researcher (such as travel following interviews carried out in the evening).
Methods of recruiting subjects (including declaration of inducements – that is, whether or not you paid them).
Evidence of having informed consent.
Data protection (including the security of your data storage and anonymity of subjects).
Look through the list and have an answer in mind for each question in case ethical concerns and obligations come up during supervision.
Dissertation ethics: Know what’s appropriate
A group of first year undergraduate students were interested in looking at teenagers’ views about how sexual content is used to boost sales of magazines. The students put together an interview schedule for a focus group but didn’t run the questions by a tutor first. Using university headed notepaper so that the questions looked official the students presented the group of 13- and 14-year-olds with the questions.
The first question asked: ‘Have you had sex?’ and the questions moved onto others including ‘Do you think that all your friends are sexually active?’ and ‘How does it feel to be the only one in your group of friends who’s still a virgin?’ Clearly these questions wouldn’t have been approved by the tutor, but the students were genuinely surprised when the university staff expressed their shock.
Dissertation ethics: Gain informed consent
You must have the consent of people taking part in your research. In most cases you’re required to have written consent and your course tutor or department may well have a standard form for you to use. Consent forms are designed to comply with Government requirements, which exist to protect vulnerable people from any poor research practices. One example of this is the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) check that you’re going to need if your research involves children.
Your responsibility to your subjects doesn’t end once you’ve collected the data. It’s up to you to be frank and honest when interpreting your subjects’ words and actions. You’re not allowed to twist words or alter what people have said or done.
Dissertation ethics: Respect other people’s ideas and views
When you’re doing interviews and carrying out questionnaires it’s important to keep your thoughts to yourself. Hiding your feelings can be hard, but if you disagree violently with someone you can end up stopping the person from expressing his views for fear of ‘getting something wrong’.
Don’t be a robot though – you can express mild surprise if someone says something really strange (you may find some subjects are after a reaction so you sometimes need to oblige), but try not to let other people’s views faze you. After all, you’re asking for the person’s opinion, so you need to let him express his opinion without feeling stupid.
Strike the right balance between modesty and arrogance. Don’t be so self-deprecating that people think that your research is a waste of time: ‘Oh, it’s just a little project, it’s not that interesting, it’s not a big deal’. Also avoid sounding self-important as this is equally off-putting: ‘Yes, I’m dealing with some really vital issues here – I want to expose the problems and find a solution to these continual low standards.’
![](http://domyassignment.website/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Dissertation ethics: Keep your subjects’ anonymity
When you’re writing about the people in your research project you need to disguise the person’s real identity, making sure that the person can’t be identified and traced. Some of your subjects may say that you don’t need to hide their identity, but although that can seem like a good idea at the time, you don't yet know where you research is going to take you and you may later regret choosing that option.
A parent, (not just the institution where the child is living, studying, or staying), must agree on behalf of a child.
Speak to your dissertation tutor about the legal aspects of your work. Generally a ‘child’ is 16 years old or under, but if someone is 17 and still studying in school, for example, you need to follow different guidelines than if you were asking your college peers who are over 18, or a 17-year-old with a full-time job.
The onus is on you to check the legality of what want to pursue. Consult your tutor if in doubt.
Changing the names of your research subjects when you’re writing about them is a good idea, but you need to do this with care and make it clear that you’ve changed the person’s names to preserve their privacy by simply saying: ‘In this dissertation, the names of subjects have been changed to preserve their anonymity’.
Give some thought to what the alternative names are going to be. Changing ‘Kelly’ to ‘Kerry’ or ‘Ian’ to ‘Iain’ isn’t going to do a good job of hiding anything much, and also be sure that you don’t change genders by mistake.
Although it can be a good idea to find a name that reflects the cultural background of your research subjects, if this is relevant to the study – take care here that you don’t slip into stereotype.
Researchers often refer to their subjects as ‘Child X’ or ‘Mrs Y’ and this does the job perfectly well. Some readers are not keen on dissertations that use this method because it seems very impersonal and makes for a jerky read.
Plus, if the examiner is marking a large number of dissertations that use the same convention, like other examiners, she may tend to forget which ‘Child A’ is which because there’s no personality linked to a person labelled by an initial letter of the alphabet (except for ‘Mr T’ of course).
Your rule of thumb is to use recognisable names that aren’t too outlandish and that are distinct from one another (don’t call your three subjects ‘Emily’, ‘Emma’ and ‘Emmie’ for example). Remember to be consistent throughout your dissertation.
Keep the real and ‘code’ names of your subjects in your dissertation notebook so that you don’t get confused.
Also remember to hide the names of schools, hospitals, specific departments or organisations you’ve been allowed to review where there are any potentially sensitive issues. Don't try to anonymise organisations such as governments or government departments, even if you’re being critical.
In your appendices and additional material you have to make sure that you anonymise any letter headings, delete logos from policy documents and change names or delete them from personal reports. It’s a fairly common error in dissertations to find that students give away their subjects’ identities in the additional material – probably because students leave dealing with the appendices and additional material until the last moment.
When you’ve finished writing up your dissertation, do a Word ‘Find’ search through the text, looking for the real names of your subjects in case you’ve slipped up somewhere.
Dissertation ethics: Acknowledge the people who help you
Your acknowledgements are more about courtesy than being a fixed requirement in your dissertation, but it’s good manners to acknowledge people who’ve helped you by being subjects in your research, or by making it easy for you find your subjects.
For example, if you’ve interviewed budget holders about how they forecast their annual spend and your gatekeeper contact at the department was a research officer or someone in human resources, be sure to thank your contact as well as the subjects you interviewed.
You can make your acknowledgements without revealing the person’s identity. Use the person’s job title and if they evenutally see a copy of your dissertation they’re going to know who they are and recognise and appreciate your gratitude. All you need to say is: ‘With sincere thanks to all those people who helped me by giving up their valuable time and sharing their considered views’.
About This Article
This article is from the book:.
- Writing a Dissertation For Dummies ,
About the book author:
Dr Carrie Winstanley is a Principal Lecturer in Education at Roehampton University, London, where she works with both undergraduate and postgraduate students. Carrie was recently named one of the Top 50 university teachers in the UK by the Higher Education Academy, for which she was awarded a national teaching fellowship.
This article can be found in the category:
- Essential Networking when Writing a Dissertation
- Obeying the Dissertation Rules and Regulations<b> </b>
- Optimising Your Dissertation Writing
- Organising Your Working Methods while Writing a Dissertation
- Settling on Your Dissertation Research Question
- View All Articles From Book
Philosophy and Ethics
- Find Background Information
- Find Articles
- Find Primary Sources
Dissertations and Theses
- Cite Sources
- ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global This link opens in a new window ProQuest database providing the electronic equivalent of Dissertation Abstracts International. Beginning with the first U.S. dissertation in 1861, represents the work of authors from North American and European universities on a full range of academic subjects. Indexes and provides access to Georgetown-authored theses and dissertations. more... less... Includes abstracts for doctoral dissertations beginning July 1980 and for Master's theses beginning Spring 1988. Citations for dissertations published from 1980 forward include 350-word abstracts. Citations for Master's theses from 1988 forward include 150-word abstracts. Most dissertations published since 1997, and some from prior years, are available for free download; others may be requested via Interlibrary Loan.
- Dissertations & Theses (Georgetown-authored) This link opens in a new window Recent online theses and dissertations from selected Georgetown programs and departments. For access to Georgetown theses and dissertations authored prior to 2006, see the Georgetown catalog or refer to ProQuest's Dissertations & Theses database. Print copies of disserations may be requested using the Library's Library Use Only Materials Request. .
- << Previous: Find Primary Sources
- Next: Cite Sources >>
- Last Updated: Nov 29, 2023 3:53 PM
- URL: https://guides.library.georgetown.edu/philosophy
![dissertation and ethics Creative Commons](https://s3.amazonaws.com/libapps/customers/757/images/by-nc.png)
School of Social and Political Science
Dissertation research - ethics requirements.
All research carried out by members of the School, including undergraduate and postgraduate dissertation projects, are subject to ethical review procedures. The ethics review process is designed to support researchers in managing risks associated with their research, and to ensure the highest professional standards in designing, conducting and disseminating research.
What do I need to do?
Before you begin your undergraduate dissertation, you will need to complete the self-assessment ethics review form. This is an online form you can access at:
- Ethics form (EASE login required)
On page 1 of the form, you will be asked to specify your supervisor and/or course organiser. For students completing the form for their UG dissertation, it is important that you list your supervisor here. If your supervisor does not appear in the drop-down list, please select specify someone not in the list and add in their details.
All of the questions you are asked on the form will be directly related to the type of research you will be undertaking and so it should be a straightforward form to complete.
You will be able to save your form at any point, so if there is a question you are unsure of, you can save your form and ask your supervisor for guidance. You can then resume completing your form by accessing it at:
- Ethics form
Once you have submitted your ethics form, your supervisor will be in touch via email, so please keep an eye on your student email account for any correspondence. You should check your Clutter and Junk folders in case any of the communications are sent there. If for any reason you need to update, revise or check the status of your form, you can login to review.
- Cookies & Privacy
- GETTING STARTED
- Introduction
- FUNDAMENTALS
- Acknowledgements
- Research questions & hypotheses
- Concepts, constructs & variables
- Research limitations
- Getting started
- Sampling Strategy
- Research Quality
- Research Ethics
- Data Analysis
Research strategy and research ethics
Research ethics is not a one size fits all approach. The research strategy that you choose to guide your dissertation determines the approach that you should take towards research ethics . Even though all dissertation research at the undergraduate and master's level should adhere to the basic ethical principles of doing good (i.e., beneficence ) and doing no harm (i.e., malfeasance ), this does not mean that the approach you take towards research ethics will be the same as other students. Rather, the approach to research ethics that you adopt in your dissertation should be consistent with your chosen research strategy. Since your research strategy consists of a number of components , the approach you adopt should reflect each of these components.
In our Research Strategy section, we introduce these major components , which include research paradigms , research designs , research methods , sampling strategies and data analysis techniques . Whilst all of these components can have ethical implications for your dissertation, we focus on research designs , a couple of research methods , sampling strategies , and data analysis techniques to illustrate some of the factors you will need to think about when designing and conducting your dissertation, as well as writing up the Research Ethics section of your Research Strategy chapter (typically Chapter Three: Research Strategy ). The impact of each of these components of research strategy on research ethics is discussed in turn:
Research designs and research ethics
Research methods and research ethics.
- Sampling strategies and research ethics
- Data analysis techniques and research ethics
Each type of research design that you can use to guide your dissertation has unique ethical challenges. These types of research design include quantitative research designs , qualitative research designs and mixed methods research designs . The impact of each of these types of research design on research ethics is discussed in turn:
Quantitative research design
Compared with qualitative research designs, the more structured and well-defined characteristics of quantitative research designs allow researchers to plan much of the research process before it starts. Even during the research process, there tends to be relatively little drift from these plans. From an ethical perspective, this makes it easier to: (a) understand what ethical challenges you may face; (b) plan how to overcome these ethical challenges; and (c) write a more robust Ethics Proposal and/or Ethics Consent Form .
This is the case whether your dissertation involves experimental or non-experimental research. In the case of non-experimental research, this can often mean that instead of having to submit an Ethics Proposal to an Ethics Committee , you may only have to convince your supervisor that you have addressed any potential ethical challenges you expect to face. This will save you time. However, if you are conducting experimental research, especially involving human subjects, there is a greater likelihood that you will need to submit an Ethics Proposal to an Ethics Committee , which can slow down the research process. Despite this, the pre-planned and procedural nature of quantitative research designs does make it easier to understand what ethical challenges you may face, which avoids potential ethical issues arising during the research process that may affect the way you can analyse and present your data.
Qualitative research design
Qualitative research designs tend to be more evolutionary in nature when compared with quantitative research designs. For example, data collected during the research process can influence the choice of research methods in subsequent phases of a qualitative research design. As a result, it is often only during the research process that potential ethical issues that may be faced in the next phase of a research project become clear. This can make it harder to: (a) understand what ethical challenges you may face; (b) plan how to overcome these ethical challenges; and (c) write an Ethics Proposal and/or Ethics Consent Form that are considered robust; at least at the outset of the dissertation process.
If your research involves (a) controversial practices (e.g., covert observation) and/or (b) sensitive groups (e.g., children, marginalised people), where ethics approval may be more challenging, the addition of a qualitative research design, with its uncertainty, may make achieving approval more difficult. However, Ethics Committees are increasingly recognising the evolutionary nature of qualitative research designs and the potential ethical uncertainties they sometimes create. For the most part, you should be able to recognise most of the potential ethical scenarios you may face during the research process and propose in advance how you would overcome these.
Mixed methods research design
If you are using a mixed methods research design, you will need to take into account the ethical challenges inherent in quantitative and qualitative research designs. After all, you will be using both qualitative and quantitative research methods. To some extent, this may put a greater burden on your dissertation, slowing down the research process, especially if you need to conduct a qualitative research phase (e.g., interviews) before you can settle on the appropriate type of quantitative research phase (e.g., experimental or non-experimental).
Whilst quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research designs all present ethical challenges, most are easily overcome. Even when using mixed methods research designs, you should be able to recognise different ethical scenarios ; that is, different ethical issues you would face if using one research method before another, or one research method in conjunction with another. Recognising the basic ethical principles that dissertations should adhere to is a good starting point [see the article: Principles of research ethics ].
The potential ethical issues raised by different research methods not only differ from one type of research method to the next (e.g., surveys versus in-depth interviews), but also the way in which a research method is used (e.g., overt versus covert observation). To illustrate some of the different ethical issues you will face across research methods, we discuss surveys and structured interviews , observation and informal and in-depth interviews . Each of these research methods is discussed in turn:
Surveys and structured interviews
By their very nature, surveys and structured interviews have to be designed before the research process starts. In fact, since these two types of research method typically use closed questions where respondents must choose from pre-defined options, most of the potential answers to questions are known in advance.
From an ethical perspective, this makes it easier to get informed consent from respondents because most aspects of the survey and structured interview process are fairly certain. Before you start the survey or structured interview process, you can clearly explain what you will be asking potential respondents, and even show them the entire research instrument (i.e., survey and interview questions and options) before they start. This can not only help you achieve informed consent , but also ease the mind of the research participant, minimising the potential for distress, which is an important basic principle of research ethics [see the article: Principles of research ethics ].
Observation
Observation, whether overt or covert , faces additional ethical considerations when compared with the use of surveys and structured interviews. Covert observation, where participants are unaware that you are conducting research, raises particular ethical issues. However, even when using overt observation, where those individuals being observed know that they are being watched, there are some specific ethical challenges that you need to overcome. Let's look at overt and covert observation in turn:
Overt observation
Most research that uses observation as a research method will be overt in nature; that this, the research participants will be aware that you are observing them and should know what you are observing. In this sense, it should be possible to obtain informed consent from those individuals that you are observing.
However, this is not always the case. In some instances, access to research participants in an observational setting such as an organisation may have been granted by a gatekeeper ; an individual that has the right to grant access (e.g., a senior manager in an organisation). In such instances, permission may have been granted to carry out your research and participants may be aware what you are doing, but they have not necessarily given you their informed consent . In fact, gatekeepers such as senior managers with organisations may have required employees to take part. As such, participants may not have been given the right to withdraw from your research, which is one of the basic principles of research ethics [see the article: Principles of research ethics ].
Furthermore, even if an individual has been granted the right to withdraw from your research, you will need to think about how can manage this if you are observing a large group interaction (e.g., a meeting) where everyone else in the group has given their informed consent . Whilst we are not suggesting that you cannot continue with such observation, you would need to have thought about the ways that you can separate the data provided by this individual during the observation when analysing and reporting the data.
Covert observation
Covert observation can be viewed as ethically problematic because it is a form of deceptive practice . Not only are respondents not giving you informed consent , but you may also be keeping the observation covert because you feel that respondents would be otherwise unwilling to take part in your research. Whilst such covert research and deceptive practices , especially where used intentionally , can be viewed as controversial, it can be argued that they have a place in research.
Sometimes it is simply impossible to get informed consent from each participant, especially if you are accessing a group through a gatekeeper or are observing people on the move . Furthermore, if you have not been introduced to each person being observed and/or you do not have access to their contact details, it may be difficult to get informed consent later on, as well as get permission to use and/or publish any data you have collected (e.g., quotations, summaries of what was said, specific facts discussed, etc.). This could jeopardise the protection of data and individuals? confidentiality, which is a basic principle of research ethics [see the article: Principles of research ethics ].
Therefore, you will need to provide strong justifications why covert observation is necessary for the success of your dissertation, and why other, less deceptive research methods could not have been used instead.
Informal and in-depth interviews
Compared with structured interviews (and surveys), there is potentially greater uncertainty for research participants when taking part in informal and in-depth interviews. There are a couple of broad reasons for this:
Informal and in-depth interviews cannot be pre-planned in the same way that structured interviews can. Whilst it is possible to know some of the initial questions you may ask research participants at the outset of the interview, the majority of questions asked are likely to arise during the interview process as you learn more about the phenomena you are interested in. This evolutionary characteristic of informal and in-depth interviews makes it more difficult to let potential research participants know what to expect from the interview process. However, since such interview creep is inevitable, you need to be prepared for it. Nonetheless, it should still be possible to get informed consent provided you: (a) let potential research participants know what the research is about; (b) explain how the interview process will develop; that is, that you will ask new questions based on the responses you get from the research participant and as you knowledge of the phenomena you are interested in develops; and (c) reassure potential research participants that they have the right to withdraw at any time from the interview process.
In the case of in-depth interviews, in particular, greater disclosure and self-expression often take place during the interview process. Since in-depth interviews tend to be more personal in nature, you need to be able to address any ethical concerns that research participants may have. For example, greater disclosure may require: (a) a stricter adherence to data protection and participant confidentiality; (b) greater transparency by you, the researcher, when it comes to letting the research participant know how you have interpreted what they have said; and (c) specific permissions from participants to report quotations and other personally identifiable information and/or facts.
Irrespective of the research method that you use, you will need to think about what data you will be recording, how that data is to be stored, and whether research participants know how their data will be used. This is an important part of gaining informed consent.
![dissertation and ethics Georgetown University.](https://philosophy.georgetown.edu/wp-content/themes/wp-theme-whnu/build/img/georgetown-2x.png)
College of Arts & Sciences
![dissertation and ethics Georgetown University.](https://philosophy.georgetown.edu/wp-content/themes/wp-theme-whnu/build/img/georgetown-abbr-2x.png)
Past Dissertations
Hyperlinked dissertations are available through Proquest Digital Dissertations .
Name | Year | Title | Mentor |
---|---|---|---|
2024 | John Greco | ||
2023 | Bryce Huebner | ||
2023 | David Luban | ||
2022 | Karen Stohr | ||
2022 | David Luban | ||
2022 | Quill R. Kukla | ||
2022 | Quill R. Kukla | ||
2022 | Bryce Huebner | ||
2021 | William Blattner | ||
2021 | Henry Richardson | ||
2021 | Maggie Little | ||
2021 | Mark Lance | ||
2021 | Bryce Huebner | ||
2021 | Quill R. Kukla |
Name | Year | Title | Mentor |
---|---|---|---|
Karen Rice | 2020 | Karen Stohr | |
Hailey Huget | 2020 | Margaret Little | |
Michael Barnes | 2019 | Rebecca Kukla | |
Matthew Shields | 2019 | Mark Lance | |
Quentin Fisher | 2019 | Mark Lance | |
Megan Dean | 2019 | Rebecca Kukla | |
Daniel Threet | 2019 | Henry Richardson | |
Joseph Rees | 2018 | Rebecca Kukla | |
Paul Cudney | 2018 | Nancy Sherman | |
Gordon Shannon | 2017 | Mark Murphy | |
Nabina Liebow | 2017 | Rebecca Kukla | |
Colin Hickey | 2017 | Madison Powers & Maggie Litte | |
Cassie Herbert | 2017 | Rebecca Kukla | |
Jacob Earl | 2017 | Maggie Little | |
Francisco Gallegos | 2017 | William Blattner | |
Laura Guidry-Grimes | 2017 | Alisa Carse | |
Chong Un Choe-Smith | 2016 | Mark Murphy | |
Trip Glazer | 2016 | Rebecca Kukla | |
Patricia McShane | 2015 | Mark Murphy | |
Torsten Menge | 2015 | Rebecca Kukla | |
Anne Jeffrey | 2015 | Mark Murphy | |
Oren Magid | 2015 | William Blattner | |
Anthony Manela | 2014 | Maggie Little | |
Travis Rieder | 2014 | Henry Richardson | |
Kyle Fruh | 2014 | Judith Lichtenberg | |
Emily Evans | 2014 | Tom Beauchamp | |
Diana Puglisi | 2014 | Wayne Davis | |
Ann Lloyd Breeden | 2014 | Henry Richardson | |
Richard Fry | 2014 | Tom Beauchamp | |
James Olsen | 2014 | William Blattner | |
Kelly Heuer | 2013 | Maggie Little | |
Marcus Hedahl | 2013 | Maggie Little | |
Yashar Saghai | 2013 | Maggie Little | |
Tony Pfaff | 2013 | Nancy Sherman | |
Nate Olson | 2012 | Henry Richardson | |
Luke Maring | 2012 | Henry Richardson | |
Christian Golden | 2012 | Gerald Mara, Mark Lance | |
Karim Sadek | 2012 | Terry Pinkard | |
Daniel Quattrone | 2011 | Steven Kuhn | |
Amy Sepinwall | 2011 | David Luban | |
Lee Okster | 2011 | Alisa Carse | |
Jeffrey Engelhardt | 2011 | Wayne Davis | |
David Bachyrycz | 2010 | John Brough | |
Justyna Japola | 2010 | Wayne Davis |
Name | Year | Title | Mentor |
---|---|---|---|
Lauren Fleming | 2009 | Maggie Little | |
Robert Leider | 2009 | Henry Richardson | |
Billy Lauinger | 2009 | Mark Murphy | |
Tea Logar | 2009 | Maggie Little | |
Kari Esbensen | 2008 | Madison Powers | |
Ashley Fernandes | 2008 | Edmund Pellegrino | |
Chauncey Maher | 2007 | Mark Lance | |
Michael Ferry | 2007 | Mark Murphy | |
Matthew McAdam | 2007 | Wayne Davis, Maggie Little | |
Jeremy Snyder | 2007 | Margaret Little | |
Matthew Rellihan | 2006 | Wayne Davis | |
Katherine Taylor | 2006 | Alisa Carse | |
Patricia Flynn | 2006 | Henry Richardson | |
Elisa A. Hurley | 2006 | Margaret Little & Nancy Sherman | |
Colleen MacNamara | 2006 | Margaret Little | |
Daniel H. Levine | 2005 | Henry Richardson | |
Michelle Strauss | 2005 | Margaret Little | |
Jennifer K. Walter | 2005 | Alisa Carse | |
Justin Weinberg | 2004 | Henry Richardson | |
Matthew Burstein | 2004 | Mark Lance | |
Todd Janke | 2004 | William Blattner | |
Thane M. Naberhaus | 2004 | John Brough | |
Nathaniel Goldberg | 2004 | Linda Wetzel | |
Sven G. Sherman-Peterson | 2003 | G. Madison Powers | |
Eran Patrick Klein | 2002 | Edmund Pellegrino | |
Harrison Keller | 2002 | Henry Richardson | |
Thaddeus Pope | 2002 | Tom Beauchamp | |
William H. White | 2002 | Mark Lance & Margaret Little | |
Stephen Scott Hanson | 2002 | Tom Beauchamp | |
Cynthia Foster Chance | 2000 | Terry Pinkard | |
Lauren Christine Deichman | 2000 | Alisa Carse | |
Kevin Fitzgerald, SJ | 2000 | LeRoy Walters | |
Jeffrey C. Jennings | 2000 | Edmund Pellegrino |
Name | Year | Title | Mentor |
---|---|---|---|
Frank Chessa | 1999 | Tom Beauchamp | |
Elizabeth Hill Emmett-Mattox | 1999 | G. Madison Powers | |
John J. Gunkel | 1999 | William Blattner | |
Michael P. Wolf | 1999 | Mark Lance | |
Laura Jane Bishop | 1998 | LeRoy Walters | |
Whitley Robert Peters Kaufman | 1998 | Henry Richardson | |
Jeremy Randel Koons | 1998 | Mark Lance | |
Sharon Ruth Livingston | 1998 | Steve Kuhn | |
Lester Aaron Myers | 1998 | Wilfried Ver Eecke | |
Randall K. O’Bannon | 1998 | John Langan | |
Julia Pedroni | 1998 | LeRoy Walters | |
Carol Mason Spicer | 1998 | LeRoy Walters | |
Susan Allison Stark | 1998 | Margaret Little | |
Carol R. Taylor | 1997 | Edmund Pellegrino | |
Andrew Cohen | 1997 | G. Madison Powers | |
Suzanne Shevlin Edwards | 1997 | G. Madison Powers | |
Robin Fiore | 1997 | G. Madison Powers | |
Kimberly Mattingly | 1997 | G. Madison Powers | |
Wilhelmine Davis Miller | 1997 | Alisa Carse | |
Frank Daniel Davis | 1996 | Edmund Pellegrino | |
Judith Lee Kissell | 1996 | Edmund Pellegrino | |
Ronald Alan Lindsay | 1996 | Self-Determination, Suicide, and Euthanasia: The Implications of Autonomy for the Morality and Legality of Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Active Euthanasia (Volumes 1 & 2) | Tom Beauchamp |
Robert S. Olick | 1996 | Deciding for Incompetent Patients: The Nature and Limit of Prospective Autonomy and Advance Directives | Robert Veatch |
William Edward Stempsey | 1996 | Fact and Value in Disease and Diagnosis: A Proposal for Value-Dependent Realism | Robert Veatch |
John J. DeGioia | 1995 | The Moral Theories of Charles Taylor and Alasdair MacIntyre and the Objective Moral Order | Terry Pinkard |
Susan Beth Rubin | 1995 | Futility: An Insufficient Justification for Physician Unilateral Decision Making | Robert Veatch |
Daniel Patrick Sulmasy | 1995 | Killing and Allowing to Die, Volumes 1 & 2 | Edmund Pellegrino |
Paul Fein | 1994 | We Have Ways: The Law and Morality of the Interrogation of Prisoners of War (Volumes 1, 2 & 3) | John Langan |
Catherine Myser | 1994 | A Philosophical Critique of the ‘Best Interests’ Criterion and an Exploration of Balancing the Interests of Infants or Fetuses, Family Members, and Society in the United States, India, and Sweden | LeRoy Walters |
Laura Shanner | 1994 | Phenomenology of the Child-Wish: New Reproductive Technologies and Ethical Responses to Infertility | LeRoy Walters |
Christine Grady | 1993 | Ethical Issues in the Development and Testing of a Preventative HIV Vaccine | LeRoy Walters |
Kevin Arthur Kraus | 1993 | Hoping in the Healing Process: An Integral Condition to the Ethics of Care | Edmund Pellegrino |
Patricia Von Gaertner Mazzarella | 1993 | Can Eternal Objects Be the Foundation for a Process Theory of Morality? | Edmund Pellegrino |
Cynthia Anderson | 1992 | Kant’s Theory of Measurement | Jay Reuscher |
Carol Jean Bayley | 1992 | Values and Worldview in Clinical Research and the Practice of Medicine | Robert Veatch |
Leonard Ferenz | 1992 | Social and Ethical Impacts of Life-Extending Technologies and Interventions into the Aging Process | Robert Veatch |
Aaron Leonard Mackler | 1992 | Cases and Considered Judgments: A Critical Appraisal of Casuistic Approaches in Ethics | Tom Beauchamp |
Dennis E. Boyle | 1991 | Geometry, Place Relations and the Illusion of Physical Space | Wayne Davis |
Dianne Nutwell Irving | 1991 | Philosophical and Scientific Analysis of the Nature of the Early Human Embryo | Edmund Pellegrino |
Robert A. Mayhew | 1991 | Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Republic: A Philosophical Commentary | Alfonso Gomez-Lobo |
Cecilia Regina Ortiz-Mena | 1991 | From Existence to the Ideal: Continuity and Development in Kant’s Theology | Jay Reuscher |
Minerva San Juan | 1991 | Being Moved by Reasons: The Superiority of Kant’s Internalism | Henry Richardson |
Christopher Francis Schiavone | 1991 | The Contemplative Dimension of Rationality in the Thought of Karl Rahner: A Condition of Possibility for Revelation (Volumes 1 & 2) | Frank Ambrosio |
Virginia Ashby Sharpe | 1991 | How the Liberal Idea Fails as a Foundation for Medical Ethics, or, Medical Ethics “In a Different Voice” | Edmund Pellegrino |
Mary Louise Wessell | 1991 | Health Care for the Poor: A Critical Examination of the Views of Edmund A. Pellegrino and H. Tristram Engelhardt | Edmund Pellegrino |
Patrick Sven Arvidson | 1990 | Limits in the Field of Consciousness | John Brough |
Sigrid Fry-Revere | 1990 | The Social Accountability of Bioethics Committees and Consultants | LeRoy Walters |
Marilee R. Howard | 1990 | The Relevance of Catholic Social Teachings for Determining Priorities for Rationing Health Care | John Langan |
Jeffrey Paul Kahn | 1990 | The Principle of Nonmaleficence and the Problems of Reproductive Decision Making | Tom Beauchamp |
Mark Steven Mitsock | 1990 | Husserl on Modern Philosophy: A Study of Erste Philosophie | John Brough |
Maura Ann O’Brien | 1990 | Moral Voice in Public Policy: Responding to the AIDS Pandemic | LeRoy Walters |
William Charles Soderberg | 1990 | Genetic Obligations to Future Generations | LeRoy Walters |
Susan Sylar Stocker | 1990 | Husserl and Gadamer on Historicity of Understanding: Can Historicism Be Avoided? | John Brough |
Cornelia Tsakiridou | 1990 | The Death of Form: Artistic Being and Artistic Culture in Hegel | Wilfried Ver Eecke |
Bruce David Weinstein | 1990 | Moral Voice in Public Policy: Responding to the AIDS Pandemic | Robert Veatch |
Name | Year | Title | Mentor |
---|---|---|---|
Fatin Khalil Ismail Al-Bustany | 1989 | Scientific Change as an Evolutionary, Information Process: Its Structural, Conceptual, and Cultural Elements | George Farre |
David Dion DeGrazia | 1989 | Interests, Intuition, and Moral Status (Vol. 1) | Tom Beauchamp |
Jacqueline Jean Glover | 1989 | The Role of Physicians in Cost Containment: An Ethical Analysis | LeRoy Walters |
John Lawrence Hill | 1989 | In Defense of Surrogate Parenting Arrangements: An Ethical and Legal Analysis | LeRoy Walters |
Eric Mark Meslin | 1989 | Protecting Human Subjects from Harm in Medical Research: A Proposal for Improving Risk Judgments by Institutional Review Boards | LeRoy Walters |
Albdelkader Aoudjit | 1988 | A Critique of Existential Marxism | George Farre |
Mary Ann Gardell Cutter | 1988 | Explanation in Clinical Medicine: Analysis and Critique | Tom Beauchamp |
Marcella Fausta Tarozzi Goldsmith | 1988 | Nonrepresentational Forms of the Comic: Humor, Irony, and Jokes | Wilfried Ver Eecke |
Margaret McKenna Houck | 1988 | Derek Parfit and Obligations to Future Generations | LeRoy Walters |
Erna Joy Kroeger Mappes | 1988 | The Ethics of Care and the Ethic of Rights: A Problem for Contemporary Moral Theory | Tom Beauchamp |
Rolland William Pack | 1988 | Case Studies and Moral Conclusions: The Philosophical Use of Case Studies in Biomedical Ethics | Edmund Pellegrino |
Joseph Francis Rautenberg | 1988 | Grisez, Finnis and the Proportionalists: Disputes over Commensurability and Moral Judgment in Natural Law | Richard McCormick |
Najla Abri Hamadeh Osman | 1987 | Freud’s Theory of the Death Instinct and Lacan’s Interpretation | Wilfried Ver Eecke |
Devra Beck Simiu | 1987 | Disorder and Early Alienation: Lacan’s Original Theory of the Mirror Stage | Wilfried Ver Eecke |
Barry Kerlin Smith | 1987 | The Problem of Truth in Literature | John Brough |
James Winslow Anderson | 1986 | Three Abortion Theorists: A Critical Appreciation | LeRoy Walters |
Angela Rose Ricciardelli | 1986 | A Comparison of Wilfred Desan’s and Pierre Teihard de Chardin’s Thinking With Regard to the Nature of Man’s Survival in a United World | Sr. Virginia Gelger & Thomas McTighe |
Gladys Benson White | 1986 | A Philosophical Analysis of the Normative Status of the Family | LeRoy Walters |
Timothy Owen Davis | 1985 | The Problem of Intersubjectivity in Husserlian Phenomenology | John Brough |
Eric Thomas Juengst | 1985 | The Concept of Genetic Disease and Theories of Medical Progress | Tom Beauchamp |
Jameson Kurasha | 1985 | The Importance of Philosophy of Mind in Educational Theory | Wayne Davis |
Deborah Ruth Mathieu | 1985 | Preventing Harm and Respecting Liberty: Ethical and Legal Implications of New Prenatal Therapies | Henry Veatch |
John Marcus Rose | 1985 | Plotinus and Heiddeger on Anxiety and the Nothing | Thomas McTighe |
Dorothy E. Vawter | 1985 | The Truth and Objectivity of Practical Propositions: Contemporary Arguments in Moral Epistemology | Alfonso Gomez-Lobo |
Abigail Rian Evans | 1984 | Health, Healing and Healer: A Theological and Philosophical Inquiry | William May |
Sara Thompson Fry | 1984 | Protecting Privacy: Judicial Decision-Making in Search of a Principle | LeRoy Walters |
Michael Patrick Malloy | 1984 | Civil Authority in Medieval Philosophy: Selected Commentaries of Aquinas and Bonaventure | Thomas McTighe |
Ray Edward Moseley | 1984 | Animal Rights: An Analysis of the Major Arguments for Animal Rights | LeRoy Walters |
Jody Palmour | 1984 | The Ancient Virtues and Vices: Philosophical Foundations for the Psychology, Ethics, and Politics of Human Development (Volume 1) | Wilfried Ver Eecke |
Marcia Winfred Sichol | 1984 | The Application of Just War Principles to Nuclear War and Deterrence in Three Contemporary Theorists: Michael Walzer, Paul Ramsey, and William V. O’Brien | John Langan |
Donald Clare Bogie | 1983 | For an Ethical Individualism | Henry Veatch |
Katheryn A. Cabrey | 1982 | An Ethical Perspective on the Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources as Exemplified in the Federal Financing of Care to Renal Patients | LeRoy Walters |
Alan Lawrence Udoff | 1982 | Evil, History and Faith | Thomas McTighe |
William R. Casement | 1981 | Indoctrination and Contemporary Approaches to Moral Education | Jesse Mann |
John Francis Donovan | 1981 | Church-State Relations in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right | Thomas McTighe |
Fr. Thomas Joseph Joyce | 1981 | Dewey’s Process of Inquiry as the Basis of His Educational Model | Jesse Mann |
Josef Kadlec | 1981 | Aging – A New Problem of Modern Medicine | H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr. |
James Joseph McCartney | 1981 | The Relationship Between Karol Wojtyla’s Personalism and the Contemporary Debate Over the Ontological Status of Human Embryological Life | Richard McCormick |
Nina Virginia Mikhalevsky | 1981 | The Concept of Rational Being in Kant’sMetaphysics of the Groundwork of Morals | H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr. |
John MacMillan Simons | 1981 | Spirit and Time: Plotinus’s Doctrine of the Two Matters | Thomas McTighe |
Carol Ann Tauer | 1981 | The Moral Status of the Prenatal Human Subject of Research | Tom Beauchamp |
Charlotte Elizabeth Witt | 1981 | Essentialism: Aristotle and the Contemporary Approach | Alfonso Gomez-Lobo |
Emmanuel Damascus Akpan | 1980 | The Pseudo Deontology of John Rawls: In Defense of the Principle of Utility | Tom Beauchamp |
Johanna Maria Bantjes | 1980 | Kripke’s Interpretation of Wittgenstein’s Theory of Proper Names | George Farre |
Gary Martin Seay | 1980 | Prescriptivism and Moral Weakness | Tom Beauchamp |
Name | Year | Title | Mentor |
---|---|---|---|
Peter McLaren Black | 1979 | Killing and Letting Die | Tom Beauchamp |
Ileana Jacoubovitch Grams | 1979 | The Logic of Insanity Defense | Tom Beauchamp |
Sander H. Lee | 1979 | Does Moral Freedom Imply Anarchism? | Henry Veatch |
Francine Michele Rainone | 1979 | Marx and the Classical Tradition in Moral Philosophy | Henry Veatch |
Francis Joseph Kelly | 1978 | Structural and Developmental Aspects of the Formulation of Categoral Judgments in the Philosophy of Edmund Husserl | John Brough |
Richard Norman Stichler | 1978 | Ideals of Freedom | Tom Beauchamp |
Charles Coulter Verharen | 1978 | The Demarcation of Philosophy from Science and Art in the Methodology of Wittgenstein | George Farre |
Harold Bleich | 1977 | Herbert Marcuse’s Philosophy: A Critical Analysis | Wilfried Ver Eecke |
Andrea Beryl King | 1977 | Benevolent Dictatorship in Plato’s Republic | n.a. |
Emil James Piscitelli | 1977 | Language and Method in the Philosophy of Religion: A Critical Study of the Philosophy of Bernard Lonegan | Thomas McTighe |
Jane S. Zembaty | 1977 | The Essentialism of Kripke and Madden and Metaphysical Necessity | Tom Beauchamp |
Michael Jan Fuksa | 1976 | Logic, Language and the Free Will Defense | Henry Veatch |
Ann Neale | 1976 | The Concept of Health in Medicine: A Philosophical Analysis | Leroy Walters & Tom Beauchamp |
Richard Chibikodo Onwuanibe | 1976 | An Ethical Inquiry on Franz Fanon’s Revolutionary Humanism: A Critique of the Use of Violence | Henry Veatch & Jesse Mann |
Sue Ellen Sloca | 1976 | An Examination and Evaluation of Criticism Directed Against the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis | Wilfried Ver Eecke |
Michael Eugene Downey | 1975 | Language About God: Analytic, Synthetic, or Synthetic a priori? | Henry Veatch |
John Joseph Drummond | 1975 | Presenting and Kinaesthetic Sensations in Husserl’s Phenomenology of Perception | John Brough |
Thomas James Hickey | 1975 | Systems Approach to the Logic of Justification in Ordinary Language | George Farre |
Francis Ignatius Kane | 1975 | Heidegger’s Sein and Linguistic Analytic Objections | Thomas McTighe |
George John Marshall | 1975 | Can Human Nature Change?: A Tentative Answer in the Light of the Positions of Dewey, Sarte, and Their Critics | Wilfred Desan & Jesse Mann |
Michael Christopher Normile | 1975 | Individual and Society: Dewey’s Reconstruction and Resolution | Jesse Mann |
Kathleen Louise Usher | 1975 | A Clarification of Edmund Husserl’s Distinction Between Phenomenological Psychology and Transcendental Phenomenology | John Brough |
Debra Beth Bergoffen | 1974 | The Crisis of Western Consciousness: An Interpretation of Its Meaning Through an Analysis of the Temporal Symbols of Western Culture | Wilfried Ver Eecke |
Sister Marietta Culhane | 1974 | Philosophical Clarification of the Contemporary Concept of Self-Identity | Rocco Porreco |
James George Fisher | 1974 | The Distinction Between Substances and Principal Attribute in Descartes | Thomas McTighe |
Sister Patricia Hayes | 1974 | An Analysis of Kant’s Use of the Term ‘Metaphysics’ | John Reuscher |
Thomas Albin Mappes | 1974 | Inductive Reasoning and Moral Reasoning: Parallel Patterns of Justification | Tom Beauchamp |
Joseph Edmund Martire | 1974 | The Logic of Depiction and the Logic of Description: An Analysis of ‘The Picture Theory’ of the Tractatus and Its Criticisms in the Philosophical Investigations | George Farre |
John Patrick Mohr | 1974 | Self-Referential Language and the Existence of God in the Philosophy of Hegel | Wilfried Ver Eecke |
Sister Marilyn Clare Thie | 1974 | Whitehead on a Rational Explanation of Religious Experience | Louis Dupré |
Sister Mary-Rita Grady | 1973 | Time, The Form of the Will: An Essay on Josiah Royce’s Philosophy of Time | Jesse Mann |
Jerome Aloysius Miller | 1973 | The Irrefutability of Metaphysical Truths | Thomas McTighe |
Anne Rogers Devereux | 1973 | Der Vorgriff (The Pre-Apprehension of Being) and the Religious Act in Karl Rahner | Louis Dupré |
Thomas Toyoshi Tominaga | 1973 | A Wittgensteinian Inquiry into the Confusions Generated by the Question ‘What is the Meaning of a Word?’ | George Farre |
Sister Mary Elizabeth Giegengack | 1972 | Can God Be Experienced? A Study in the Philosophy of Religion of William Ernest Hocking | Louis Dupré |
Kevin Benedict McDonnell | 1971 | Religion and Ethics in the Philosophy of William of Ockham | Germain Grisez |
David Novak | 1971 | Suicide and Morality in Plato, Aquinas, and Kant | Germain Grisez |
William M. Richards | 1971 | A New Interpretation of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus | George Farre |
Joseph Michael Boyle | 1970 | The Argument from Self-Referential Consistency: The Current Discussion | Germain Grisez |
John Barnett Brough | 1970 | A Study of the Logic and Evolution of Edmund Husserl’s Theory of the Constitution of Time-Consciousness, 1893-1917 | Louis Dupré |
Rev. Martin Joseph Lonergan | 1970 | Gabriel Marcel’s Phenomenology of Incarnation | Wilfred Desan |
John Patrick Minahan | 1970 | The Metaphysical Misunderstanding of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus | George Farre |
George Francis Sefler | 1970 | The Structure of Language and its Relation to the World: A Methodological Study of the Writings of Martin Heidegger and Ludwig Wittgenstein | Wilfred Desan |
Thomas Joseph Shalvey | 1970 | The Philosophical Foundations of the Role of the Collective in the Work of Levi-Strauss | Wilfred Desan |
Olaf Philip Tollefsen | 1970 | Verification Procedures in Dialectical Metaphysics | Germain Grisez |
Name | Year | Title | Mentor |
---|---|---|---|
Michael Didoha | 1969 | Conceptual Distortion and Intuitive Creativity: A Study of the Role of Knowledge in the Thought of Nicholas Berdyaev | Wilfred Desan |
Joel Celedonio Ramirez | 1969 | The Personalist Metaphysics of Xavier Zubiri | Jesse Mann |
Raymond Michael Herbenick | 1968 | C.S. Peirce and Contemporary Theories of the Systems Concept and Systems Approach to Problem-Solving and Decision-Making: An Introductory Essay on Systems Theory in Philosophical Analysis | Jesse Mann |
Rev. Walter John Stohrer | 1968 | The Role of Martin Heidegger’s Doctrine of Dasein in Karl Rahner’s Metaphysics of Man | Wilfred Desan |
John H. Walsh | 1968 | A Fundamental Ontology of Play and Leisure | Wilfred Desan |
Loretta Therese Zderad | 1968 | A Concept of Empathy | Wilfred Desan |
Mary-Angela Harper | 1967 | A Study of the Metaphysical Problem of Intersubjectivity | Louis Dupré |
Elena Lugo | 1967 | Jose Ortega y Gasset’s Sportive Sense of Life: His Philosophy of Man | Wilfred Desan |
Carl Herman Pfuntner | 1967 | An Examination of the Extent of Philosophical Dependence, Methodological and Metaphysical, of John Dewey on Charles Peirce | Jesse Mann |
Rev. Rene Firmin De Brabander | 1966 | Immanent Philosophy and Transcendent Religion: Henry Dumery’s Philosophy of Christianity | Louis Dupré |
Joseph C. Mihalich | 1965 | The Notion of Value in the Existentialism of Jean-Paul Sartre | Wilfred Desan |
Magda Munoz-Colberg | 1965 | An Evaluation of Auguste Comte’s Theory of Inequality | Wilfred Desan |
William A. Owen | 1964 | Whitehead’s Philosophy of Science the Concept of Substance | Jesse Mann |
Thomas E. Schaefer | 1963 | The Meaning of Chun Tzu in the Thought of Mencius | n.a. |
Eulalio R. Baltazar | 1962 | A Critical Examination of the Methodology of | Wilfred Desan |
Pierre Emile Nys | 1961 | Body and Soul: The Center of Metaphysics? | Thomas McTighe |
Paul R. Sullivan | 1961 | Ontic Aspects of Cognition in Poetry | Rudolph Allers |
Forrest H. Peterson | 1960 | The Study of Power in the Philosophies of Hegel and Marx | H. A. Rommen |
Name | Year | Title | Mentor |
---|---|---|---|
Rev. John R. Kanda | 1959 | Certain Intellectual Operations and the Neo-Scholastic Method | Edward Hanrahan |
Rev. Robert R. Kline | 1959 | The Present Status of Value Theory in the United States | Rudolph Allers |
Joseph G. Connor | 1958 | The Jesuit College and Electivism: A Study in the Philosophy of American Education | John Daley |
Robert P. Goodwin | 1958 | The Metaphysical Pragmatism of Charles Sanders Peirce | Rudolph Allers |
John Paul W. Fitzgibbon | 1958 | The Philosophy of Poetic Symbolism, Medieval and Modern | Rudolph Allers |
- How it works
![dissertation and ethics researchprospect post subheader](https://www.researchprospect.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/3-3.webp)
Useful Links
How much will your dissertation cost?
Have an expert academic write your dissertation paper!
Dissertation Services
![dissertation and ethics Dissertation Services](https://www.researchprospect.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/expert.webp)
Get unlimited topic ideas and a dissertation plan for just £45.00
Order topics and plan
![dissertation and ethics Order topics and plan](https://www.researchprospect.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/unlimted.webp)
Get 1 free topic in your area of study with aim and justification
Yes I want the free topic
![dissertation and ethics Yes I want the free topic](https://www.researchprospect.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/one-free.webp)
Philosophy Dissertation Topics
Published by Grace Graffin at January 9th, 2023 , Revised On January 9, 2023
Introduction
The choice of dissertation topic is crucial for research as it will facilitate the process and makes it an exciting and manageable process. Several dissertation ideas exist in philosophy, including metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, logic, aesthetics, deontology, absurdum, and existentialism. Philosophy dissertations can be based on either primary research or secondary research.
Primary data dissertations incorporate the collection and analysis of data obtained through questionnaires and surveys. On the other hand, secondary data dissertations make use of existing literature to test the research hypothesis . To help you get started with philosophy topic selection for your dissertation, a list is developed by our experts.
These philosophy dissertation topics have been developed by PhD qualified writers of our team , so you can trust to use these topics for drafting your dissertation.
You may also want to start your dissertation by requesting a brief research proposal from our writers on any of these topics, which includes an introduction to the topic, research question , aim and objectives , literature review along with the proposed methodology of research to be conducted. Let us know if you need any help in getting started.
Check our dissertation examples to get an idea of how to structure your dissertation .
Review the full list of dissertation topics for 2022 here.
Philosophy Dissertation Topics of Research
Topic 1: an examination of women's perspective on feminist philosophy..
Research Aim: This study aims to look into the importance of feminism in a philosophical context. It will also identify the factors that lead to postmodernism and liberal feminism from women’s perspectives and will also focus on the impact of feminist philosophy on the development of modern society.
Topic 2: Sociological Functionalism- Investigating the Development and Beliefs
Research Aim: This research study will focus on new types of functionalism and get a deeper understanding of inner and outer circumstances in which different approaches take place. This study will also investigate how the researchers use social theory to acquire a better understanding of the environment in which these concepts are used. It will also promote sociology through informing and inspiring practices and research.
Topic 3: Assessing the History and Development of Philosophical Work from the 15th to 21st Century.
Research Aim: This study aims to find the history and development of philosophical work from the 15th and 21st Centuries. It will examine the theoretical foundations of the practice, applications, and social consequences. This study will also focus on different factors of how philosophy has evolved in these centuries and what changes have occurred.
Topic 4: A Comprehensive View of Social Development of Loneliness.
Research Aim: This study will comprehend how various theoretical points of view are connected or linked r to loneliness. This study will also present an argument for an interpretative social point of view by dissembling the sense of loneliness into key components. It will also focus on the problems and different behaviours of people.
Topic 5: What does it mean to live in an Ideal Society- Discuss using Plato's Philosophies.
Research Aim: Plato is well known for his monologue known as the Republic; he was also the classical political philosopher whose views influenced future political thoughts. Plato’s ideal society was created during a time when Plato was exceedingly optimistic about human nature and its ability to absorb knowledge. This study will conduct a deep analysis of Plato’s ideologies and his views and their impact on the western political world.
More Philosophy Dissertation Research Topics
Topic 1: why we should stop capital punishment and adopt permanent solutions to help solve crimes..
Research Aim: This research aims to analyse the importance of rehabilitation and counseling of criminals to bring them back to their usual walks of life. The whole idea is to eliminate crime, and capital punishment does not provide solutions where a clean society can be developed.
Topic 2: Should people always obey the rules? A closer look at the line between breaking rules and rebellion.
Research Aim: Rules are developed to maintain a balance in society and ensure discipline, which helps an individual in every sphere of their lives. But specific rules are created only for serving a group and not for the whole society’s best interest. This research aims at finding pieces of evidence where rule-breaking is a rebellion and for the upliftment of humanity and not in personal interest.
Topic 3: Loneliness: Reconstructing its meaning
Research Aim: This research aims at finding the meaning of loneliness, what it is to feel lonely, why some people are reclusive, isolate themselves. Loneliness is not always related to sadness, and some people feel better in isolation due to their bitter experiences of life.
Topic 4: Understanding why religion is paramount above anything else for many people around the globe.
Research Aim: Religion forms the basis of life and way of living for many people around the globe. People often get confused with religion and spiritualism, and the grandeur associated with religion becomes more important. The lack of knowledge and education forces blind faith. This research aims to find the reason for dependency on religion and how it negatively affects human lives.
Topic 5: What is the best way to boost a person’s creativity?
Research Aim: This research aims at finding the best possible way to boost a person’s creativity. The most important way is to motivate, inspire, and support them in their process of exploring innovative ideas. Recognition of talent can be the most effective method, which the research will investigate.
Topic 6: Morality and religion: Why are they different, yet they talk about the same thing?
Research Aim: The fundamental essence of religion is compassion and empathy for humans and ensures morality and ethics as a way of life. This research emphasises the primary aim of a religion and how people are getting disoriented and making rituals of religion the prime concern.
Topic 7: Wealth: Is it possible to be rich without having a lot of money?
Research Aim: Wealth and money are co-related as lots of money gives the power to buy anything. But a wealth of human life lies in their moral values, love, affection, proper health and wellbeing, and money cannot accept them. This research topic will speak about becoming wealthy, even with limited monetary wealth.
Topic 8: How can the custom of dowry be eliminated from people’s minds?
Research Aim: Dowry is a social parasite, and it is now a punishable offence by the law. But rules alone cannot change society. The research aims at eradicating the practice of dowry from people’s minds in the light of education.
Topic 9: To love or to be loved: Which is more important?
Research Aim: Love is the feeling of intense desire or deep affection. The most beautiful feeling gives a sense of satisfaction and grows through exchange between two individuals. To love and be loved are two co-related aspects as human expects love in return. The research focuses on the more critical dilemma, being on the giving or receiving side of love.
Topic 10: Why social behaviour and ethics cannot be separated?
Research Aim: The research aims to evaluate the importance of ethics in social behaviour and why they cannot be separated. An ethical society is a proper place to thrive for every individual.
Topic 11: A more in-depth look at things that make human life meaningful.
Research Aim: Money, power does not always buy happiness. The research lays the foundation for the importance of care, compassion, empathy. Love and affection as the more essential aspects that make human life meaningful.
Topic 12: Is it possible to create an ideal society?
Research Aim: An ideal society is free from any crime and economic disparities where everyone is treated equally. This research will discuss whether a perfect community is attainable; it is practically possible or not.
Topic 13: A closer look at modern life values.
Research Aim: The research aims to focus on the change in values in modern times. The research’s primary purpose is to provide a comparative study of how modern people’s mindset has changed over time.
Topic 14: Euthanasia: Is it ethical?
Research Aim: A long time debate exists regarding the ethical side of euthanasia. Ending someone’s life can be considered unlawful as we do not have the right to end something we did not create. This research aims at providing evidence in favour of euthanasia and also the negative aspects.
Topic 15: What is the value of truth? Are there instances when lying is good?
Research Aim: The research aims to provide evidence where lying is not unethical. The study will give an example from Bhagwat Gita, where Lord Krishna lied to safeguard humanity.
Free Dissertation Topic
Phone Number
Academic Level Select Academic Level Undergraduate Graduate PHD
Academic Subject
Area of Research
You May Also Like
Look at some of the potential healthcare dissertation topics mentioned below to take an idea for starting your dissertation.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is the process of building machines, robots and software that are intelligent enough to act as humans.
Keeping your baby healthy and growing properly starts at birth. Nurses who specialize in child health can help! Nurses who specialize in child health educate parents about safety, hygiene, and nutrition to prevent common childhood illnesses.
USEFUL LINKS
LEARNING RESOURCES
![dissertation and ethics researchprospect-reviews-trust-site](https://www.researchprospect.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/researchprospect-reviews-trust-site.webp)
COMPANY DETAILS
![dissertation and ethics Research-Prospect-Writing-Service](https://www.researchprospect.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Research-Prospect-Writing-Service.webp)
- How It Works
Sharing views on good care
- Learning Events
- Theses and Dissertations
- Publications
- Frans Vosman
- Exhibitions
- Care Ethicists
- Country Surveys
- Corona-times
- End of life
Category Archives: Theses and Dissertations
![dissertation and ethics](https://i0.wp.com/ethicsofcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/67B003E6-C2B3-4CEB-A7B3-769DB9AAA5B6-scaled-e1600954314613.jpeg?resize=620%2C382&ssl=1)
Care, Class and Singularistic Morality in Late Modernity
In his master’s thesis, Sylwin Gilles Cornielje has taken up care-ethicist Frans Vosman’s reflections on self-realisation as a class-bound normative ideal. Continue reading Care, Class and Singularistic Morality in Late Modernity →
![dissertation and ethics](https://i0.wp.com/ethicsofcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/mvermeulen_schaftenaar-e1552919467322.jpg?resize=620%2C397&ssl=1)
Aiming at contact. Relational caring and the everyday interaction as effective principles in clinical forensic care
Petra Schaftenaar, member of the research network Critical Ethics of Care, presents a summary of the results of her PhD-thesis Aiming at contact. Relational caring and the everyday interaction as effective principles in clinical forensic care (2018) in the following article. Continue reading Aiming at contact. Relational caring and the everyday interaction as effective principles in clinical forensic care →
![dissertation and ethics](https://i0.wp.com/ethicsofcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/955B2EE0-BBCE-46D1-AEFB-5833BAF5818C-e1599046378225.jpeg?resize=620%2C413&ssl=1)
Practical wisdom: vital core of professionalism in medical practices
The subject of the PhD thesis of Marij Bontemps is practical wisdom, “.. the virtuous capacity to .. discover what is morally relevant, knowing how to decide, knowing how to act, as well as knowing how to learn from what was not done well. Continue reading Practical wisdom: vital core of professionalism in medical practices →
![dissertation and ethics](https://i0.wp.com/ethicsofcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Schermafdruk-van-2018-04-30-16-47-26-e1525100063236.jpg?resize=620%2C474&ssl=1)
Attentiveness is complex and political
An interview with Klaartje Klaver about her PhD thesis Dynamics of Attentiveness (2016) Continue reading Attentiveness is complex and political →
![dissertation and ethics](https://i0.wp.com/ethicsofcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Screenshot_20200126-160102-e1580141966470.jpg?resize=620%2C494&ssl=1)
The fragile voices from the work floor. Care-ethical power issues reconsidered
Social worker Silke Jacobi MA considers in the summary of her care-ethical thesis (2019) the possibilities of more impact and (political) participation of the institutional care-worker in an ambiguous neo-liberal context. Continue reading The fragile voices from the work floor. Care-ethical power issues reconsidered →
![dissertation and ethics](https://i0.wp.com/ethicsofcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Schermafdruk-van-2018-04-01-12-08-24-e1522609247244.jpg?resize=620%2C358&ssl=1)
Affect matters
Affect Matters is a book about relationship. It is about the centrality of affect in our relationships to others, and in particular, it examines the precariousness and ambiguity of our affect-filled lives. Continue reading Affect matters →
- Terms of Use
- How It Works
- PhD thesis writing
- Master thesis writing
- Bachelor thesis writing
- Dissertation writing service
- Dissertation abstract writing
- Thesis proposal writing
- Thesis editing service
- Thesis proofreading service
- Thesis formatting service
- Coursework writing service
- Research paper writing service
- Architecture thesis writing
- Computer science thesis writing
- Engineering thesis writing
- History thesis writing
- MBA thesis writing
- Nursing dissertation writing
- Psychology dissertation writing
- Sociology thesis writing
- Statistics dissertation writing
- Buy dissertation online
- Write my dissertation
- Cheap thesis
- Cheap dissertation
- Custom dissertation
- Dissertation help
- Pay for thesis
- Pay for dissertation
- Senior thesis
- Write my thesis
177 Interesting Ethics Paper Topics For Your Thesis
![dissertation and ethics ethics paper topics](https://thesisgeek.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ethics-paper-topics-scaled.jpeg)
Ethics is a branch of study in philosophy that studies the concept of morality—what is good or bad, what is acceptable or unacceptable. It’s a philosophical theory that looks into moral rules and codes, principles, value systems, and other related concepts.
In academia, an ethical theory is used as one of the analytical tools in drawing analysis on several socio-cultural topics. Ethics can be applied to any particular subject matter in human society. And, on this, so many compelling, controversial or interesting ethical topics for academic essays and research papers have continued to spring up.
For students writing either an essay or a research paper on ethics, there are some relevant things to note about a good essay/research topic and writing a dissertation. They include:
Brainstorm on different topics Always go for a topic you are familiar with Choose a topic that has enough “flesh”. This is important as interesting topics will help you develop your essay/research Define your subject of interest. It makes the writing easier Properly researching for topics that serve contemporary social relevance Outlining is important for your research topic
What following some of these processes does for your essay/research/thesis is that it enriches your work and affords you the ability to communicate ideas clearly to readers. Here are some topics in ethics you can use for your essay/research.
Interesting Top Level Ethics Paper Topics for All Students
Writing a paper on ethics makes for an interesting writing experience because they usually require that the writer make a case for a particular subject based on whether the subject is right or wrong. There are so many ethical topics for papers. As a student, there are several ethical questions to debate, and you can choose to model your topic using some of these samples:
- Discuss what should be done concerning the rise in the ban on safe abortion
- Is the right to safe abortion practice unethical?
- Should abortion practice be promoted or championed for women in society?
- Are humans truly the root source for the issues of climate change and global warming the world is currently experiencing?
- Is it right to discriminate against the sexes?
- Is there a defining difference between sexes and gender?
- Is the practice of gender-based violence ethical?
- Should safe sexual practices be promoted?
- Sex: A Study of the growing practice of sexual relationships outside marriage
- Domestic Violence and how it can be combated
- Marijuana: The distinction to its health roles and health challenges it poses on individuals
- Is it unethical to promote capitalism and capitalist concepts?
- A Study of Racism and measures to ensure its decline
- Is it ethical to be a millionaire while there are so many less privileged people?
- A study of the ethical challenges that come with being in the academia
- Is war an ethical practice?
- Why LGBTQ+ people should not be discriminated against
- What are the ways workplace ethics can address issues of homophobia and internalized sexism?
- Is sexism in the workplace an ethical practice?
- The issue of microaggression and how it can be addressed
- A study of why workplaces need ethical conduct that monitors issues of workplace harassment
- Should salaries be uneven?
- How unethical are uneven salary payment structures?
- Should start-up tech companies hire more men for starters?
- How people can prioritize online privacy
- Is bridging online privacy unethical?
- Is the right to privacy unethical?
Engaging Ethical Dilemma Topics
As ethics deals with the debate on morals, one of the ways topics on ethics manifests is in the subject of dilemma. Topics like this focus on trying to find a suitable justification for one idea over another. There are several ethics topics to write about on this subject. Some of them include:
- Should students be allowed to bring their phones to school?
- Should parents police every social activity of their children?
- Should teachers use the cane on students as a disciplinary measure?
- Is flogging a good correctional practice?
- Should you leave your partner if they are of opposing political views?
- Should opposing religious beliefs be a deal-breaker in relationships?
- Should capitalism be abolished completely?
- Should a teacher maintain some level of friendship with their students?
- Is there any lingering importance of capitalism to society?
- Is revenge a viable option in a relationship if your partner cheats on you?
- Is sharing your experiences online the same as showing off a lifestyle?
- Should people from different religious beliefs and backgrounds partner?
- Is checking the DNA of your children important or necessary?
- Should parents enforce their children on behaviors to take up?
- Can discipline properly correct the attitudes of a child?
- Should eating junk foods be avoided completely?
- Should Halloween Trick or Treat and Costume be prioritized over Thanksgiving Dinners?
- Should children hold different religious beliefs from their parents while still young?
- Does strict parenting serve as the best way to raise a child?
- Is it important to reveal a secret to a friend or to keep one’s peace?
- Should cooking at home be prioritized over eating out?
- Is socialism a more suitable social practice than capitalism?
- Is accepting financial assistance from your parents acceptable after a certain age?
- Should school authorities seize phones brought to school?
- Is sending a child to a mixed school better than same-sex schools?
- Can afforestation alone save the world from global warming and the general climate change condition?
- Does being educated equate with being intelligent?
Ethical Issues to Write about in Your College Essay
One important thing to note about ethical topics is that they touch across so many different subjects. As a college student preparing to write an essay on ethics, rest assured as there are so many ethics ideas to write about. Here are some ethical topics to write about:
- Does Hiring female employees cover a company’s sexist motives?
- Should Actors be paid more than teachers?
- Taking medical decisions for a patient without their consent
- How ethical is the interference of the judiciary by the legislative arm of government?
- Is it ethical to fire someone due to their dress code?
- Is it unethical to wear colored hair to work?
- Is censorship ethical?
- Where does media censorship draw the line?
- Is it ethical for religious figureheads to meddle in state politics?
- Should gender be the reason why a person is restricted access to certain social privileges?
- Should sexuality be a discriminatory factor in society?
- Should companies and places of work provide counseling and therapy services for their employees?
- Can Children wear makeup on special occasions?
- Is it unethical to make medical decisions for a patient without any recognizable relatives?
- Does dress code need to affect how you are addressed?
- Should implementing ethics in sports be recommended?
- Is police brutality an ethical practice?
- The impacts of the excessive consumption of media content?
- Is the excessive use of social media healthy?
- How can companies ensure paid maternal and paternal leave?
- How can the inclusion of non-binary people in company policies promote growth?
- Is exclusion on the grounds of sexuality ethical?
- Is exclusion due to political beliefs unethical?
- How to promote ethical work culture?
- How can a company ensure that ethical practices are promoted in their companies?
Ethical Argument Topics to Write About
The best part about writing an ethical essay is that it is about anything that is of interest. An important aspect of the ethical argument topic is that it is supported with evidence. There are so many ethical topics to write about that fall within this category, and they include:
- Is the having of ethical codes and conducts important in an organization?
- Should people only implement progressive ideas to meet societal needs?
- Why LGBTQ+ should not be discriminated against
- Is it unethical to come to work late?
- Is government-sanctioned execution an ethical practice?
- Is the American incarceration system an effective corrective system?
- Is corrective rape an ethical practice?
- Should the issue of internalized homophobia be addressed?
- Internalized patriarchy and internalized homophobia, which one births one
- Should smoking weed be made legal?
- Why do the less privileged need free healthcare services
- A study of the effects of colonialism and internalized slavery
- Must aspiring journalists only focus on journalism courses?
- Addressing what it means to be of ethical behavior
- Should students be given a take-home assignment?
- Is there any academic relevance to assignments?
- Is access to free healthcare important?
- Does following the ethics code have abt social relevance?
- What role should developed countries play for developing countries?
- Is analysis writing an important aspect of literature?
- What role does ethics play in schools
- Should the address of global warming be continuous?
- Is there room for possible positive developments in global warming?
- Is the practice of ethics the same as moral teaching
- Should schools create sex education into their education curriculum
Comprehensive Ethics Debate Topics for Anyone
Just like the argumentative ethics topic, a debate topic on ethics centers majorly on choosing a part to argue for or against. This argument also is wrapped with evidence to support it. Your ethic topics can be on any subject. You can choose moral topics or any other topic with relevance. Here are some lists of ethical debate topics anyone can write on:
- Should the use of Contraceptives be promoted?
- Does legalizing weed make it any healthier?
- Should school children bring phones into school settings?
- The health impact of excessive engagement on social media
- Social relevance and importance of having ethical conducts
- Do companies with ethical conduct grow ahead
- Does ethics make a workplace safer?
- Are there importance on why sex education should be added to student’s
- Why safe abortion rights should be legalized
- Why the discrimination based on sexuality is harmful
- Why the practice of hedonism is important
- Sexual pleasure: Is it morally good?
- Is happiness dependent on an external factor?
- Why Institutionalized racism is the root cause of racism and racist beliefs
- Should the use of drugs be legalized?
- Is there any progressive importance to having a conservative view on things?
- Should social media apps allow explicit sexual content?
- Should social app builders have access to individual account
- Can homeschool match formal school training?
- Should the government ensure censorship measures?
- Is voting during elections the only form of patriotism?
- Is voting a patriotic display
- Are families allowed to have contradicting religious beliefs?
- Should state governments have any interference with the federal government?
- Should teenagers have access to contraceptives?
Good Ethical Research Papers for your Thesis or Dissertation
Writing either a thesis or a dissertation is a necessary part of academia. As a university student, you can’t graduate from only writing essays withiut writing your graduating thesis. There are so many areas your research paper about ethics can focus on. Here is a list of ethical topics:
- The contemporary relevance of applied ethics
- The psychological impacts of the proliferation of technology
- A Case Study of the legality of weed
- A multi-dimensional approach to the subject of marriage
- An ethical approach to the killing of animals
- A case study of the critical ethical debates on the use of contraception
- An analytical study of the relevance of ethical conduct in the workplace
- An investigation into the social relevance and importance of the beauty pageantry culture
- A critical study of normative ethics
- The role of applied ethics in the building of a healthy work culture
- An overview of the barriers associated with good leadership practice
- A Study of the importance of ethical practice in the healthcare system
- The study of ethics in business social responsibility
- An Overview on how Ethics promotes a saner working culture
- A look into how ethics promotes healthy social relationships
- The ethical relevance for Doctor and Patient Confidentiality
- Malpractice and Negligence an ethically challenging issue within the healthcare system
- The social and health relevance to access to free healthcare insurance
- A Study of the social relevance of ethics
- Violence: violence against animals is still abuse
- A look into strategic approaches to managing cyber crimes
- Ethic reasons for the separation of the church from politics
- Ethical Conduct: How Organizations with practicable ethics produces a toxic work environment
- A look into how Social media negatively impacts the IQ of a student
- The role of self-awareness and professional responsibility impacts social ethics in the workplace
Good Ethical Questions for Discussion
Primarily, ethics asks and answers the question of wrong or good. There are so many social issues that will make for good ethical questions for discussion. Here is a list of ethical questions for students to form insights from:
- How does ethics help to promote healthy workplace awareness?
- Does the practice of abortion negate morality?
- Is it right for a rape victim to be denied access to safe and free abortion?
- How do homophobia, racism, misogyny, and ableist practices hinder social growth?
- Should there be free access to condoms and contraceptive pills?
- Is free access to contraceptives better than the provision of menstrual materials
- How can racism be dismantled in an organization without consideration to institutionalized racism?
- How does the continuous promotion of capitalist concepts hinder societal progress?
- Does capitalism truly hinder social growth?
- Why should there be free access to contraceptive materials especially for women?
- What are the possible feasible solutions to the issue of climate change?
- Is it unethical not to share the wealth?
- Is engaging in warfare the right way to bring solutions?
- Does the use of makeup contradict the concept of beauty?
- Why are LGBTQ+ rights human rights?
- Is the legalization of cannabis ethical?
- Does the way you dress need to be the reason you are addressed a certain way?
- Are there moral problems that come with job automation?
- What can be done to combat the use of harmful substances
- Why should companies stop discriminating based on sex?
- What is the social relevance of providing workplace access?
- Why should parents and teachers stop flogging students?
- What is the distinction between discipline and strictness?
- Should religious beliefs be a dealbreaker in any relationship?
Are you a student who needs awesome essay writing help or thesis help and will require the professional services of writers in any particular field that will assist you with your write my thesis issues? We have expert 24/7 available online writers who are PhD holders, teachers, and professors in various fields that provide high quality custom thesis and essay materials that will not just help you pass your semester course but also gain you top grades, all at an affordable rate.
![dissertation and ethics 210 Biochemistry Research Topics](https://thesisgeek.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/210-Biochemistry-Research-Topics-1-scaled.jpg)
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment * Error message
Name * Error message
Email * Error message
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
As Putin continues killing civilians, bombing kindergartens, and threatening WWIII, Ukraine fights for the world's peaceful future.
Ukraine Live Updates
![dissertation and ethics Repository logo](https://digital.lib.washington.edu/assets/uwlib/images/Transparent_UW_WHITE.png)
Hope for Sustainable Hospitality: Learning to Listen Ethically through Discourses of Difference and Dialogic Philosophy
Journal Title
Journal issn, volume title, description, collections.
UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Permanent URI for this community https://hdl.handle.net/2152/4
This collection contains University of Texas at Austin electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs). The collection includes ETDs primarily from 2001 to the present. Some pre-2001 theses and dissertations have been digitized and added to this collection, but those are uncommon. The library catalog is the most comprehensive list of UT Austin theses and dissertations.
Since 2010, the Office of Graduate Studies at UT Austin has required all theses and dissertations to be made publicly available in Texas ScholarWorks; however, authors are able to request an embargo of up to seven years. Embargoed ETDs will not show up in this collection. Most of the ETDs in this collection are freely accessible to all users, but some pre-2010 works require a current UT EID at point of use. Please see the FAQs for more information. If you have a question about the availability of a specific ETD, please contact [email protected].
Some items in this collection may contain offensive images or text. The University of Texas Libraries is committed to maintaining an accurate and authentic scholarly and historic record. An authentic record is essential for understanding our past and informing the present. In order to preserve the authenticity of the historical record we will not honor requests to redact content, correct errors, or otherwise remove content, except in cases where there are legal concerns (e.g. potential copyright infringement, inclusion of HIPAA/FERPA protected information or Social Security Numbers) or evidence of a clear and imminent threat to personal safety or well-being. This policy is in keeping with the American Library Association code of ethics to resist efforts to censor library resources, and the Society of American Archivists code of ethics that states "archivists may not willfully alter, manipulate, or destroy data or records to conceal facts or distort evidence."
Authors of these ETDs have retained their copyright while granting the University of Texas Libraries the non-exclusive right to reproduce and distribute their works.
Collections in this Community
- UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations 31360
![dissertation and ethics Notre Dame Logo](https://dhjhkxawhe8q4.cloudfront.net/notre-dame-v2-wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/18134732/ndp-white.png)
On The Site
![dissertation and ethics](https://dhjhkxawhe8q4.cloudfront.net/notre-dame-v2-wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/16172150/Bioethics-Series-2024-New-Books-scaled.jpg)
- Notre Dame Press Partners with De Nicola Center for Ethics and Culture on Two New Titles
July 22, 2024 | Notre Dame Press | News , Philosophy and Ethics , Religion and Theology
In partnership with the de Nicola Center for Ethics and Culture, the University of Notre Dame Press is proud to announce the publication of two new titles in the Notre Dame Studies in Medical Ethics and Bioethics series: Bioethics after God: Morality, Culture, and Medicine by Mark J. Cherry, the Dr. Patricia A. Hayes Professor in Applied Ethics and professor of philosophy at St. Edward’s University, Austin, Texas, and The Ethics of Precision Medicine: The Problems of Prevention in Healthcare by Paul Scherz, associate professor of moral theology and ethics at the Catholic University of America.
Bioethics after God explores the relationship between morality and medicine in a society that has denied the existence of God. “This text was a joy to read,” declares Bryan Pilkington, a professor at Seton Hall University. “A number of its claims are not easy to grapple with, but they are well-argued, clearly and politely presented, and should be taken seriously.”
The Ethics of Precision Medicine investigates the ethical challenges raised by precision medicine and its focus on medical risk as opposed to current disease. “Ordinary people should read this book to set themselves free of the illusion that medicine holds in its hands their future,” says Farr Curlin, co-author of The Way of Medicine .
Both books are available for sale directly from the University of Notre Dame Press at undpress.nd.edu or wherever books are sold.
ABOUT THE DE NICOLA CENTER FOR ETHICS AND CULTURE : The de Nicola Center for Ethics and Culture is committed to sharing the richness of the Catholic moral and intellectual tradition through teaching, research, and public engagement, at the highest level and across a range of disciplines – both on campus at the University of Notre Dame, and as Notre Dame in the public square.
ABOUT THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME PRESS: The University of Notre Dame Press, the largest Catholic university press in the world, publishes academic and general interest books that engage the most enduring questions of our time. The Press primarily publishes in areas that align with the academic strengths of the University of Notre Dame, including religion, theology, history, philosophy, political science and theory, medieval studies, Irish studies, Latin American studies, and international relations. Through reviews, scholarly citations, and translations, Notre Dame Press books extend the reach and reputation of the University.
Recent Posts
- An Interview with H. Knox Thames, Author of “Ending Persecution”
- An Interview with Mark O. Hubbard, Author of “Ara”
- Notre Dame Press Presents Its Fall 2024 Catalog of Publications
- Enter Our Giveaway for a Chance to Win a Copy of “Prisms, Veils: A Book of Fables”
- Enter Our Giveaway for a Chance to Win a Copy of “Fighting Irish Football: The Notre Dame Tradition in Photographs”
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
![dissertation and ethics University of Notre Dame](https://undpress.nd.edu/wp-content/plugins/gdpr-cookie-compliance/dist/images/gdpr-logo.png)
- Privacy Overview
- Strictly Necessary Cookies
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Abortion — Thesis Statement for Abortion
![dissertation and ethics test_template](https://htracer.gradesfixer.com/wp-content/themes/essay/assets/img/1px.png)
Thesis Statement for Abortion
- Categories: Abortion Ethics
About this sample
![dissertation and ethics close](https://htracer.gradesfixer.com/wp-content/themes/essay/assets/img/close-banner.png)
Words: 515 |
Published: Mar 20, 2024
Words: 515 | Page: 1 | 3 min read
Table of contents
The pro-choice perspective, the pro-life perspective, ethical considerations, legal implications.
![dissertation and ethics Image of Dr. Oliver Johnson](https://gradesfixer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Vector-3-1.png)
Cite this Essay
Let us write you an essay from scratch
- 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
- Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours
Get high-quality help
![dissertation and ethics author](https://htracer.gradesfixer.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/download-150x150.jpeg)
Verified writer
- Expert in: Social Issues Philosophy
![dissertation and ethics writer](https://htracer.gradesfixer.com/wp-content/themes/essay/assets/img/2022/07/wr-6-150x150.jpg)
+ 120 experts online
By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
Related Essays
1 pages / 506 words
2 pages / 963 words
3 pages / 1467 words
4 pages / 2000 words
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.
121 writers online
Still can’t find what you need?
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled
Related Essays on Abortion
The practice of aborting a pregnancy has been a subject of debate among different cultures, religions, and societies. The controversy surrounding abortion lies in the ethical, legal, and religious implications it has on society. [...]
Abortion is a controversial issue that has remained a topic of heated debate in the United States and other parts of the world. It is a medical procedure that involves terminating a pregnancy before the fetus is viable. While [...]
It is crucial to understand and critically examine the topic of abortion rights. This contentious issue has been a subject of debate and controversy for decades, with individuals holding strong opinions on both sides of the [...]
Satire is a potent tool that can be employed to address sensitive topics, and one such contentious issue is the abortion debate. Abortion, a divisive subject, has fueled passionate arguments for many years. The purpose of this [...]
Abortion is murder. 3000 babies are being killed every single day. In every 1000 women there are 12-13 abortions and there are 4.3 billion women in the world. I do believe it is a choice but a wrong choice because you are [...]
In recent years, abortion has been the most controversial and politically charged subject in the United States. Abortion can be defined as the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy. The two main sides of the debate are [...]
Related Topics
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Where do you want us to send this sample?
By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Be careful. This essay is not unique
This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before
Download this Sample
Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!
Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .
- Instructions Followed To The Letter
- Deadlines Met At Every Stage
- Unique And Plagiarism Free
![](http://domyassignment.website/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Explore the essential ethical considerations in dissertation research with our comprehensive guide. Learn about informed consent, confidentiality, risk mitigation, and more to ensure your research is conducted ethically and responsibly.
Research ethics are a set of principles that guide your research designs and practices in both quantitative and qualitative research. In this article, you will learn about the types and examples of ethical considerations in research, such as informed consent, confidentiality, and avoiding plagiarism. You will also find out how to apply ethical principles to your own research projects with ...
An overview of the basic principles of research ethics you need to consider when performing a dissertation at the undergraduate or master's level.
In the research context, ethics can be defined as "the standards of behaviour that guide your conduct in relation to the rights of those who become the subject of your work, or are affected by it" (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill 2015, p239). The University itself is guided by the fundamental principle that research involving humans and /or ...
The Ethics section of Laerd Dissertation provides articles to help you understand what aspects of research ethics to include in your dissertation or thesis.
Learn about research ethics issues and how they affect your replication-based dissertation.
Ethical considerations are the foundation of sound research practices. Ensuring that your dissertation adheres to ethical principles and guidelines is not just a formality; it's a fundamental aspect of maintaining the integrity and credibility of your research.
Ethical considerations in research refer to the principles and guidelines that researchers must follow to ensure that their studies are conducted in an ethical and responsible manner. These considerations are designed to protect the rights, safety, and well-being of research participants, as well as the integrity and credibility of the research itself
Scientific ethics is defined as commitment to the ideals of science: integrity, openness and critical inquiry. Every member of the scientific community, from the student beginning their Bachelor's thesis to the world famous academic, follows the same rules and guidelines of ethical scientific practice.
This article explores the ethical issues that may arise in your proposed study during your doctoral research degree.
This chapter describes ethical issues in social research including discussion of the NASW Code of Ethics, Institutional Review Board (IRB) processes, and requirements for the protection of human subjects. In addition, quantitative research methods; qualitative research methods; mixed-methods research designs; experimental, quasi-experimental, explanatory, exploratory, and descriptive research ...
Conclusions Research ethics are inadequately covered in most dissertations by nurses in Sweden. Important ethical concerns are missing, and the complexity of reasoning on ethical principles, motives and implications is insufficient.
Graduate students undertaking research for graduate courses, major research papers, theses, or dissertations involving human participants are required to follow the appropriate procedures and obtain ethics approval before conducting research activities. Students also must maintain active registration status while conducting the approved research. The information below outlines the ethics ...
In order to address ethical considerations aspect of your dissertation in an effective manner, you will need to expand discussions of each of the following points to at least one paragraph: 1. Voluntary participation of respondents in the research is important. Moreover, participants have rights to withdraw from the study at any stage if they ...
Dissertation ethics: Acknowledge the people who help you. Your acknowledgements are more about courtesy than being a fixed requirement in your dissertation, but it's good manners to acknowledge people who've helped you by being subjects in your research, or by making it easy for you find your subjects.
Resources for research in philosophy and ethics. Use this page to find dissertations on philosophy and ethics research topics.
The ethics review process is designed to support researchers in managing risks associated with their research, and to ensure the highest professional standards in designing, conducting and disseminating research. What do I need to do? Before you begin your undergraduate dissertation, you will need to complete the self-assessment ethics review form.
An overview of how the research strategy you choose to guide your dissertation impacts upon issues of research ethics when doing dissertation research at the undergraduate or master's level.
This article reviews and assesses research on ethics and integrity in public administration published in two peer reviewed journals—the Public Administration Review and Public Integrity for the ten year period, 20052014. It builds on two previous reviews conducted. by the author — in 1999 and 2005.
Hyperlinked dissertations are available through Proquest Digital Dissertations.
The choice of dissertation topic is crucial for research as it will facilitate the process and makes it an exciting and manageable process. Several dissertation ideas exist in philosophy, including metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, logic, aesthetics, deontology, absurdum, and existentialism. Philosophy dissertations can be based on either primary research or secondary research.
18-03-2019 Petra Schaftenaar. Petra Schaftenaar, member of the research network Critical Ethics of Care, presents a summary of the results of her PhD-thesis Aiming at contact. Relational caring and the everyday interaction as effective principles in clinical forensic care (2018) in the following article. Continue reading.
Ethics considers the concept of morality. Provided is a list of ethics paper topics and ethical issues to write about for your research.
In this dissertation, I respond to gaps in scholarship related to listening in communication research and difference in ethics scholarship to construct a dialogic listening ethic based on situated difference, embedded in historical narratives, and focused on emerging dialogue.
This collection contains University of Texas at Austin electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs). The collection includes ETDs primarily from 2001 to the present. Some pre-2001 theses and dissertations have been digitized and added to this collection, but those are uncommon.
In partnership with the de Nicola Center for Ethics and Culture, the University of Notre Dame Press is proud to announce the publication of two new titles in the Notre Dame Studies in Medical Ethics and Bioethics series: Bioethics after God: Morality, Culture, and Medicine by Mark J. Cherry, the Dr. Patricia A. Hayes Professor in Applied Ethics and professor of philosophy at St. Edward's ...
The ethical considerations surrounding abortion are complex and multifaceted. The issue of when life begins is central to the debate, with pro-life advocates arguing that life begins at conception, while pro-choice advocates often believe that life begins at birth or at some point during pregnancy.