• Exponent Laws and Logarithm Laws
• Trig Formulas and Identities
• Differentiation Rules
• Trig Function Derivatives
• Table of Derivatives
• Table of Integrals
• Calculus Home

• Evaluating Limits
• Limits at Infinity
• Limits at Infinity with Square Roots
• Calculating Derivatives
• Equation of a Tangent Line
• Mean Value Theorem & Rolle’s Theorem
• Garden fence
• Least expensive open-topped can
• Printed poster
• Snowball melts
• Snowball melts, area decreases at given rate
• How fast is the ladder’s top sliding
• Angle changes as a ladder slides
• Lamp post casts shadow of man walking
• Water drains from a cone
• Given an equation, find a rate

Have a question you could use some help with? Please post on our Forum:

Community.Matheno.com

It's free for your use, just to support your learning. We'd love to help!

## Related Rates

Calculus related rates problem: lamp post casts a shadow of a man walking..

A 1.8-meter tall man walks away from a 6.0-meter lamp post at the rate of 1.5 m/s. The light at the top of the post casts a shadow in front of the man. How fast is the “head” of his shadow moving along the ground?

## Calculus Solution

2. Write an equation that relates the quantities of interest. We are given that the man is walking away from the post at the rate $\dfrac{dx}{dt} = 1.5$ m/s. We are looking for the rate at which the “head” of the man’s shadow moves, which is $\dfrac{d \ell}{dt}$. We thus need to somehow relate $\ell$ to x , so we can then develop the relationship between their time-derivatives.

There’s a subtlety to this problem that typically goes unaddressed: We’re focusing on $\ell$ and $\dfrac{d \ell}{dt}$ here because $\ell$ is the distance from the shadow’s tip to the stationary post . We’re not examining the shadow’s length itself (labeled $\ell – x$ in the left figure below) because that length is relative to the man’s feet, which are also moving. So we’d find a different answer if we calculated the rate at which that gray shadow is changing. This problem asks us to find the rate the shadow’s head as it moves along the (stationary) ground, so it’s best to make our measurements from a point that isn’t also moving—namely, from the post. Hence we focus on $\ell$ and aim to compute $\dfrac{d \ell}{dt}$.

B. To develop your equation, you will probably use . . . similar triangles.

In the figure above we’ve separated out the two triangles. Notice that the angles are identical in the two triangles, and hence they are similar. The ratio of their respective components are thus equal as well. Hence the ratio of their bases $\left(\dfrac{\ell – x}{\ell} \right)$ is equal to the ratio of their heights $\left( \dfrac{1.8\, \text{m}}{6.0\, \text{m}}\right)$: \begin{align*} \dfrac{\ell – x}{\ell} &= \frac{1.8 \, \text{m}}{6.0 \, \text{m}} \12px] &= 0.30 \\[12px] \ell – x &= 0.30 \ell \\[12px] \ell – 0.30 \ell &= x \\[12px] (1 – 0.30) \ell &= x \\[12px] 0.70 \ell &= x \end{align*} 3. Take the derivative with respect to time of both sides of your equation. \begin{align*} \dfrac{d}{dt}(0.70 \ell) &= \dfrac{d}{dt}(x) \\[12px] 0.70 \dfrac{d \ell}{dt} &= \dfrac{dx}{dt} \end{align*} 4. Solve for the quantity you’re after. We’re looking for \dfrac{d \ell}{dt}: \begin{align*} 0.70 \dfrac{d \ell}{dt} &= \dfrac{dx}{dt} \\[12px] \dfrac{d \ell}{dt} &= \frac{1}{0.70} \dfrac{dx}{dt} \\[12px] &= \frac{1}{0.70} \left( 1.5 \, \tfrac{\text{m}}{\text{s}}\right) \\[12px] &= 2.1\, \tfrac{\text{m}}{\text{s}} \quad \cmark \end{align*} ☕ Buy us a coffee If we've helped, please consider giving a little something back. Thank you! 😊 Return to Related Rates Problems And if you have a Calculus question, please pop over to our Forum and post. Related rates problems can be especially challenging to set up. If you could use some help, please post and we’ll be happy to assist! Share a link to this screen: • Share on Facebook • Share on Pinterest • Share on Reddit • Share on Telegram • Share on WhatsApp • Share on SMS • Email this Page ## What are your thoughts or questions? That’s a wonderful explanation, but I’m having a bit of a problem understanding the 3d step. As an eastern European – we use the f'(x) notation more often, so I blatantly just don’t understand the example :D. Could u give a solution based on v(t) = s'(t) and a(t) = v'(t) ? I also don’t really get the “in respect to time” part… Thank you for your question! We now use our Forum for such questions and answers since it offers a LOT more functionality than the ‘comments’ here. Please see our reply there, which we hope will help: https://community.matheno.com/t/derivative-with-respect-to-time-in-related-rates-lamp-post-casts-shadow-problem/264 Shan, who is 2 meters tall, is approaching a post that holds a lamp 6 meters above the ground. If he is walking at a speed of 1:5 m/s, how fast is the end of his shadow moving (with respect to the lamp post) when he is 6 meters away from the base of the lamp post? Can you help me on how to solve this? Thanks for asking, Emily. The solution to this problem is the same as the solution above, with only two changes: (1) the man’s height is now 2 m instead of 1.8 m, and (2) the sign of dx/dt is negative, dx/dt = -1.5 m/s, since he is moving toward instead of away from the post. You can read more about that sign-change in our reply to Kim in the comments below. If you make those two substitutions in the solution above, you should arrive at the answer you’re after. We hope that helps! how did you get .70l=x, from l-.30l=x Thanks for asking, Marissa! Factor the \ell out and you’ll see:  \ell – 0.30 \ell = (1 – 0.30) \ell = 0.70 \ell  Hi there, when you find the relationship between L and x, why do you put the L-x and 1.8 on top of the cross multiplication problem? Is that like a rule or something that the smaller triangle components go on top? Thanks for asking, Nicky! The answer is that we didn’t have to do it that way; the only thing that matters is that when we set the two ratios equal to each other, we’re careful to *match* the two sides given the similar triangles. Specifically, we chose to set the ratio of their bases (SMALLER triangle’s base : LARGER triangle’s base) to the ratio of their heights (SMALLER triangle’s height : LARGER triangle’s height), so the “smaller” is on top for both sides of the equation. But you could have written that instead as the inversion of both sides of that equation (putting the larger values on top for BOTH sides), and the math would come out the same in the end. So no, there’s no rule that the smaller components go on top; it’s just what we happened to do here. Does that answer your question? We hope so,and thanks again for asking! Rate of increase of distance between man’s head and tip of shadow ( head )? In the above problem Great question! As you can see from the figures above, the distance (we’ll call “d”) between the man’s head and the shadow’s tip is \[ d = \ell – x Hence its rate of change is $\dfrac{d}{dt} = \dfrac{d\ell}{dt} – \dfrac{dx}{dt}$ You can substitute values from there to find the answer. The important thing is: does that set-up make sense to you? Please let us know!

No ,I think Mr matheno you didn’t get my question The answer you have given is correct for rate of increase of shadow of a person I’m asking rate of increase distance from head of the man to top of shadow

Mr matheno Let man be AB ( A is on ground and B is head) And pole of lamp be OP(O is on ground and P be tip of lamp) AB’ be shadow (B’ is tip of head of shadow)

Now my question is that , Rate of increase of BB’?

Got it. Using the notation in the left figure immediately above, you’re looking for the rate of change of the hypotenuse of the triangle with height 1.8 m (the man’s height) and base $\ell – x.$ Let’s call that hypotenuse length “h.” Then $h^2 = (1.8)^2 + (\ell – x)^2$ You’re looking for dh/dt. We won’t work out the math for you, but if you take the derivative with respect to time (d/dt) of both sides of that last equation and solve for dh/dt you’ll find the result you’re after.

We hope that helps.

Hmm… I too did the same But getting a lengthy process Even though thanks for replying and giving me your time…

Thank you for your thanks, which we greatly appreciate. In case it’s helpful, here are the next few steps as we’d do them, which might make for a simpler approach. Taking the derivative with respect to time of the preceding line gives: $2h \dfrac{dh}{dt} = 0 + 2(\ell – x) \cdot \left(\dfrac{d\ell}{dt} – \dfrac{dx}{dt} \right)$ You were probably given a specific value of x and also a value for $\dfrac{dx}{dt}$, and can find $\dfrac{d\ell}{dt}$ as shown above. To find h , treat it as a separate subproblem and use the pythagorean theorem as shown above: $h^2 = (1.8)^2 + (\ell -x)^2$. That should give you all the values you need to substitute in and find your final answer.

## This site is free?!?

We don't charge for anything on this site, we don't run ads, and we will never sell your personal information.

We're passionate educators with a goal:

Provide high-quality, interactive materials to dedicated learners everywhere in the world, regardless of ability to pay, so they (you!) can learn well and excel.

☕ Buy us a coffee We're working to add more, and would appreciate your help to keep going! 😊

Matheno ®

Berkeley, California

AP ® is a trademark registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, this site.

• Your self-chosen confidence rating for each problem, so you know which to return to before an exam (super useful!);
• Your progress, and specifically which topics you have marked as complete for yourself.

Your selections are for your use only, and we do not share your specific data with anyone else. We do use aggregated data to help us see, for instance, where many students are having difficulty, so we know where to focus our efforts.

You will also be able to post any Calculus questions that you have on our Forum , and we'll do our best to answer them!

We believe that free, high-quality educational materials should be available to everyone working to learn well. There is no cost to you for having an account, other than our gentle request that you contribute what you can, if possible, to help us maintain and grow this site.

If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

#### IMAGES

1. Solving Related Rates Problems in Calculus

2. Calculus Related Rates

4. Related Rates ❖ Shadow Problem ❖ Calculus 1

5. 4.5c Solving Related Rates Problems

6. Related Rates

#### VIDEO

1. to find curve along which time is least calculus of variations csir net Msc maths in hindi Hd sir

2. Solving Situational Problems involving Related Rates

3. 4. Related Rates

4. Price AP Calculus AB 2-6 Related Rates day 1, part 1

5. Related Rate of the Shadow, Calculus

1. shadow lamp post (related rates problem) - Matheno.com ...

Calculus Solution [Scroll down for text (non-video) version of the solution.] Related rates - Man's shadow from a lamp post (Matheno.com) Watch on To solve this problem, we will use our standard 4-step Related Rates Problem Solving Strategy. 1. Draw a picture of the physical situation. See the figure.

This calculus video tutorial explains how to solve the shadow problem in related rates. A 6ft man walks away from a street light that is 21 feet above the g...

When I first solved a similar problem (diver leaping from 40m platform above water in normal earth gravity with a light source 15m from the diver at same height as diver; how fast is the diver's shadow moving after 1.5 seconds?) I wondered why it was moving so fast compared to the diver.

4. Related Rates Shadow Problem - Mathematics Stack Exchange

You have three variables in the problem, the distance from the post to the man, the distance from the man to the shadow tip, and the distance from the post to the shadow tip. Following the answer key, the first is x, we can call the second z, and the third is y. From the picture, you can see z = y − x.

5. EXAMPLE: PROBLEM 3.9.16 RELATED RATES - Mathematics

with respect to the man and his shadow. We solve this problem using as our relation similar triangles. Diﬀerentiating the similar triangles equation with respect to time, we form the related rates equation, and solve the problem this way. x y light 2 wall man 12 Solution: First, we draw a picture of the situation so

6. Related Rates - Conical Tank, Ladder Angle & Shadow Problem ...

This calculus video tutorial explains how to solve related rates problems using derivatives. It shows you how to calculate the rate of change with respect to radius, height, surface area,...